Cargando…
Pharmaco‐electroencephalographic responses in the rat differ between active and inactive locomotor states
Quantitative electroencephalography from freely moving rats is commonly used as a translational tool for predicting drug‐effects in humans. We hypothesized that drug‐effects may be expressed differently depending on whether the rat is in active locomotion or sitting still during recording sessions,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6806018/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30762918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejn.14373 |
_version_ | 1783461530584481792 |
---|---|
author | Hansen, Ingeborg H. Agerskov, Claus Arvastson, Lars Bastlund, Jesper F. Sørensen, Helge B. D. Herrik, Kjartan F. |
author_facet | Hansen, Ingeborg H. Agerskov, Claus Arvastson, Lars Bastlund, Jesper F. Sørensen, Helge B. D. Herrik, Kjartan F. |
author_sort | Hansen, Ingeborg H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Quantitative electroencephalography from freely moving rats is commonly used as a translational tool for predicting drug‐effects in humans. We hypothesized that drug‐effects may be expressed differently depending on whether the rat is in active locomotion or sitting still during recording sessions, and proposed automatic state‐detection as a viable tool for estimating drug‐effects free of hypo‐/hyperlocomotion‐induced effects. We aimed at developing a fully automatic and validated method for detecting two behavioural states: active and inactive, in one‐second intervals and to use the method for evaluating ketamine, DOI, d‐cycloserine, d‐amphetamine, and diazepam effects specifically within each state. The developed state‐detector attained high precision with more than 90% of the detected time correctly classified, and multiple differences between the two detected states were discovered. Ketamine‐induced delta activity was found specifically related to locomotion. Ketamine and DOI suppressed theta and beta oscillations exclusively during inactivity. Characteristic gamma and high‐frequency oscillations (HFO) enhancements of the NMDAR and 5HT (2A) modulators, speculated associated with locomotion, were profound and often largest during the inactive state. State‐specific analyses, theoretically eliminating biases from altered occurrence of locomotion, revealed only few effects of d‐amphetamine and diazepam. Overall, drug‐effects were most abundant in the inactive state. In conclusion, this new validated and automatic locomotion state‐detection method enables fast and reliable state‐specific analysis facilitating discovery of state‐dependent drug‐effects and control for altered occurrence of locomotion. This may ultimately lead to better cross‐species translation of electrophysiological effects of pharmacological modulations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6806018 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68060182019-10-28 Pharmaco‐electroencephalographic responses in the rat differ between active and inactive locomotor states Hansen, Ingeborg H. Agerskov, Claus Arvastson, Lars Bastlund, Jesper F. Sørensen, Helge B. D. Herrik, Kjartan F. Eur J Neurosci Clinical and Translational Neuroscience Quantitative electroencephalography from freely moving rats is commonly used as a translational tool for predicting drug‐effects in humans. We hypothesized that drug‐effects may be expressed differently depending on whether the rat is in active locomotion or sitting still during recording sessions, and proposed automatic state‐detection as a viable tool for estimating drug‐effects free of hypo‐/hyperlocomotion‐induced effects. We aimed at developing a fully automatic and validated method for detecting two behavioural states: active and inactive, in one‐second intervals and to use the method for evaluating ketamine, DOI, d‐cycloserine, d‐amphetamine, and diazepam effects specifically within each state. The developed state‐detector attained high precision with more than 90% of the detected time correctly classified, and multiple differences between the two detected states were discovered. Ketamine‐induced delta activity was found specifically related to locomotion. Ketamine and DOI suppressed theta and beta oscillations exclusively during inactivity. Characteristic gamma and high‐frequency oscillations (HFO) enhancements of the NMDAR and 5HT (2A) modulators, speculated associated with locomotion, were profound and often largest during the inactive state. State‐specific analyses, theoretically eliminating biases from altered occurrence of locomotion, revealed only few effects of d‐amphetamine and diazepam. Overall, drug‐effects were most abundant in the inactive state. In conclusion, this new validated and automatic locomotion state‐detection method enables fast and reliable state‐specific analysis facilitating discovery of state‐dependent drug‐effects and control for altered occurrence of locomotion. This may ultimately lead to better cross‐species translation of electrophysiological effects of pharmacological modulations. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-04-01 2019-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6806018/ /pubmed/30762918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejn.14373 Text en © 2019 The Authors. European Journal of Neuroscience published by Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Clinical and Translational Neuroscience Hansen, Ingeborg H. Agerskov, Claus Arvastson, Lars Bastlund, Jesper F. Sørensen, Helge B. D. Herrik, Kjartan F. Pharmaco‐electroencephalographic responses in the rat differ between active and inactive locomotor states |
title | Pharmaco‐electroencephalographic responses in the rat differ between active and inactive locomotor states |
title_full | Pharmaco‐electroencephalographic responses in the rat differ between active and inactive locomotor states |
title_fullStr | Pharmaco‐electroencephalographic responses in the rat differ between active and inactive locomotor states |
title_full_unstemmed | Pharmaco‐electroencephalographic responses in the rat differ between active and inactive locomotor states |
title_short | Pharmaco‐electroencephalographic responses in the rat differ between active and inactive locomotor states |
title_sort | pharmaco‐electroencephalographic responses in the rat differ between active and inactive locomotor states |
topic | Clinical and Translational Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6806018/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30762918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejn.14373 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hanseningeborgh pharmacoelectroencephalographicresponsesintheratdifferbetweenactiveandinactivelocomotorstates AT agerskovclaus pharmacoelectroencephalographicresponsesintheratdifferbetweenactiveandinactivelocomotorstates AT arvastsonlars pharmacoelectroencephalographicresponsesintheratdifferbetweenactiveandinactivelocomotorstates AT bastlundjesperf pharmacoelectroencephalographicresponsesintheratdifferbetweenactiveandinactivelocomotorstates AT sørensenhelgebd pharmacoelectroencephalographicresponsesintheratdifferbetweenactiveandinactivelocomotorstates AT herrikkjartanf pharmacoelectroencephalographicresponsesintheratdifferbetweenactiveandinactivelocomotorstates |