Cargando…

Pharmaco‐electroencephalographic responses in the rat differ between active and inactive locomotor states

Quantitative electroencephalography from freely moving rats is commonly used as a translational tool for predicting drug‐effects in humans. We hypothesized that drug‐effects may be expressed differently depending on whether the rat is in active locomotion or sitting still during recording sessions,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hansen, Ingeborg H., Agerskov, Claus, Arvastson, Lars, Bastlund, Jesper F., Sørensen, Helge B. D., Herrik, Kjartan F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6806018/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30762918
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejn.14373
_version_ 1783461530584481792
author Hansen, Ingeborg H.
Agerskov, Claus
Arvastson, Lars
Bastlund, Jesper F.
Sørensen, Helge B. D.
Herrik, Kjartan F.
author_facet Hansen, Ingeborg H.
Agerskov, Claus
Arvastson, Lars
Bastlund, Jesper F.
Sørensen, Helge B. D.
Herrik, Kjartan F.
author_sort Hansen, Ingeborg H.
collection PubMed
description Quantitative electroencephalography from freely moving rats is commonly used as a translational tool for predicting drug‐effects in humans. We hypothesized that drug‐effects may be expressed differently depending on whether the rat is in active locomotion or sitting still during recording sessions, and proposed automatic state‐detection as a viable tool for estimating drug‐effects free of hypo‐/hyperlocomotion‐induced effects. We aimed at developing a fully automatic and validated method for detecting two behavioural states: active and inactive, in one‐second intervals and to use the method for evaluating ketamine, DOI, d‐cycloserine, d‐amphetamine, and diazepam effects specifically within each state. The developed state‐detector attained high precision with more than 90% of the detected time correctly classified, and multiple differences between the two detected states were discovered. Ketamine‐induced delta activity was found specifically related to locomotion. Ketamine and DOI suppressed theta and beta oscillations exclusively during inactivity. Characteristic gamma and high‐frequency oscillations (HFO) enhancements of the NMDAR and 5HT (2A) modulators, speculated associated with locomotion, were profound and often largest during the inactive state. State‐specific analyses, theoretically eliminating biases from altered occurrence of locomotion, revealed only few effects of d‐amphetamine and diazepam. Overall, drug‐effects were most abundant in the inactive state. In conclusion, this new validated and automatic locomotion state‐detection method enables fast and reliable state‐specific analysis facilitating discovery of state‐dependent drug‐effects and control for altered occurrence of locomotion. This may ultimately lead to better cross‐species translation of electrophysiological effects of pharmacological modulations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6806018
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68060182019-10-28 Pharmaco‐electroencephalographic responses in the rat differ between active and inactive locomotor states Hansen, Ingeborg H. Agerskov, Claus Arvastson, Lars Bastlund, Jesper F. Sørensen, Helge B. D. Herrik, Kjartan F. Eur J Neurosci Clinical and Translational Neuroscience Quantitative electroencephalography from freely moving rats is commonly used as a translational tool for predicting drug‐effects in humans. We hypothesized that drug‐effects may be expressed differently depending on whether the rat is in active locomotion or sitting still during recording sessions, and proposed automatic state‐detection as a viable tool for estimating drug‐effects free of hypo‐/hyperlocomotion‐induced effects. We aimed at developing a fully automatic and validated method for detecting two behavioural states: active and inactive, in one‐second intervals and to use the method for evaluating ketamine, DOI, d‐cycloserine, d‐amphetamine, and diazepam effects specifically within each state. The developed state‐detector attained high precision with more than 90% of the detected time correctly classified, and multiple differences between the two detected states were discovered. Ketamine‐induced delta activity was found specifically related to locomotion. Ketamine and DOI suppressed theta and beta oscillations exclusively during inactivity. Characteristic gamma and high‐frequency oscillations (HFO) enhancements of the NMDAR and 5HT (2A) modulators, speculated associated with locomotion, were profound and often largest during the inactive state. State‐specific analyses, theoretically eliminating biases from altered occurrence of locomotion, revealed only few effects of d‐amphetamine and diazepam. Overall, drug‐effects were most abundant in the inactive state. In conclusion, this new validated and automatic locomotion state‐detection method enables fast and reliable state‐specific analysis facilitating discovery of state‐dependent drug‐effects and control for altered occurrence of locomotion. This may ultimately lead to better cross‐species translation of electrophysiological effects of pharmacological modulations. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-04-01 2019-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6806018/ /pubmed/30762918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejn.14373 Text en © 2019 The Authors. European Journal of Neuroscience published by Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Clinical and Translational Neuroscience
Hansen, Ingeborg H.
Agerskov, Claus
Arvastson, Lars
Bastlund, Jesper F.
Sørensen, Helge B. D.
Herrik, Kjartan F.
Pharmaco‐electroencephalographic responses in the rat differ between active and inactive locomotor states
title Pharmaco‐electroencephalographic responses in the rat differ between active and inactive locomotor states
title_full Pharmaco‐electroencephalographic responses in the rat differ between active and inactive locomotor states
title_fullStr Pharmaco‐electroencephalographic responses in the rat differ between active and inactive locomotor states
title_full_unstemmed Pharmaco‐electroencephalographic responses in the rat differ between active and inactive locomotor states
title_short Pharmaco‐electroencephalographic responses in the rat differ between active and inactive locomotor states
title_sort pharmaco‐electroencephalographic responses in the rat differ between active and inactive locomotor states
topic Clinical and Translational Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6806018/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30762918
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejn.14373
work_keys_str_mv AT hanseningeborgh pharmacoelectroencephalographicresponsesintheratdifferbetweenactiveandinactivelocomotorstates
AT agerskovclaus pharmacoelectroencephalographicresponsesintheratdifferbetweenactiveandinactivelocomotorstates
AT arvastsonlars pharmacoelectroencephalographicresponsesintheratdifferbetweenactiveandinactivelocomotorstates
AT bastlundjesperf pharmacoelectroencephalographicresponsesintheratdifferbetweenactiveandinactivelocomotorstates
AT sørensenhelgebd pharmacoelectroencephalographicresponsesintheratdifferbetweenactiveandinactivelocomotorstates
AT herrikkjartanf pharmacoelectroencephalographicresponsesintheratdifferbetweenactiveandinactivelocomotorstates