Cargando…

Outcome of Normal‐Flow Low‐Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis With Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction: A Propensity‐Matched Study

BACKGROUND: Normal‐flow, low‐gradient severe aortic stenosis (NF‐LG‐SAS), defined by aortic valve area <1 cm(2), mean gradient <40 mm Hg, and indexed stroke volume >35 mL/m(2), is the most prevalent form of low‐gradient aortic stenosis (AS). However, the true severity of AS and the manageme...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chadha, Gagandeep, Bohbot, Yohann, Rusinaru, Dan, Maréchaux, Sylvestre, Tribouilloy, Christophe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6806034/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31550970
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.012301
_version_ 1783461534387666944
author Chadha, Gagandeep
Bohbot, Yohann
Rusinaru, Dan
Maréchaux, Sylvestre
Tribouilloy, Christophe
author_facet Chadha, Gagandeep
Bohbot, Yohann
Rusinaru, Dan
Maréchaux, Sylvestre
Tribouilloy, Christophe
author_sort Chadha, Gagandeep
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Normal‐flow, low‐gradient severe aortic stenosis (NF‐LG‐SAS), defined by aortic valve area <1 cm(2), mean gradient <40 mm Hg, and indexed stroke volume >35 mL/m(2), is the most prevalent form of low‐gradient aortic stenosis (AS). However, the true severity of AS and the management of NF‐LG‐SAS are controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of patients with NF‐LG‐SAS compared with moderate AS (MAS) and with high‐gradient severe‐AS (HG‐SAS). METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 154 patients with NF‐LG‐SAS, 366 with MAS (aortic valve area between 1.0 and 1.3 cm(2)), and 1055 with HG‐SAS were included. On multivariate analysis, after adjustment for covariates of prognostic importance, NF‐LG‐SAS patients did not exhibit an excess risk of mortality compared with MAS patients under medical management (hazard ratio=1.13 [95% CI, 0.82‐1.56]; P=0.45) and under medical and surgical management (hazard ratio 1.06 [95% CI, 0.79‐1.43]; P=0.70), even after further adjustment for aortic valve replacement (hazard ratio=1.09 [95% CI, 0.81‐1.48]; P=0.56). The 6‐year cumulative incidence of aortic valve replacement (performed in accordance with guidelines) was comparable between the 2 groups (39±4% for NF‐LG‐SAS and 35±3% for MAS, P=0.10). After propensity score matching (n=226), NF‐LG‐SAS and MAS patients also had comparable outcomes under medical (P=0.41) and under medical and surgical management (P=0.52). NF‐LG‐SAS had better outcomes than HG‐SAS patients (adjusted hazard ratio 1.84 [95% CI, 1.18‐2.88]; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that patients with NF‐LG‐SAS have a comparable outcome to those with MAS when aortic valve replacement is performed during follow‐up according to guidelines, mostly at the stage of HG‐SAS. Rigorous echocardiographic assessment to rule out measurement errors and close follow‐up are essential to detect progression to true severe AS in NF‐LG‐SAS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6806034
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68060342019-10-28 Outcome of Normal‐Flow Low‐Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis With Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction: A Propensity‐Matched Study Chadha, Gagandeep Bohbot, Yohann Rusinaru, Dan Maréchaux, Sylvestre Tribouilloy, Christophe J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Normal‐flow, low‐gradient severe aortic stenosis (NF‐LG‐SAS), defined by aortic valve area <1 cm(2), mean gradient <40 mm Hg, and indexed stroke volume >35 mL/m(2), is the most prevalent form of low‐gradient aortic stenosis (AS). However, the true severity of AS and the management of NF‐LG‐SAS are controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of patients with NF‐LG‐SAS compared with moderate AS (MAS) and with high‐gradient severe‐AS (HG‐SAS). METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 154 patients with NF‐LG‐SAS, 366 with MAS (aortic valve area between 1.0 and 1.3 cm(2)), and 1055 with HG‐SAS were included. On multivariate analysis, after adjustment for covariates of prognostic importance, NF‐LG‐SAS patients did not exhibit an excess risk of mortality compared with MAS patients under medical management (hazard ratio=1.13 [95% CI, 0.82‐1.56]; P=0.45) and under medical and surgical management (hazard ratio 1.06 [95% CI, 0.79‐1.43]; P=0.70), even after further adjustment for aortic valve replacement (hazard ratio=1.09 [95% CI, 0.81‐1.48]; P=0.56). The 6‐year cumulative incidence of aortic valve replacement (performed in accordance with guidelines) was comparable between the 2 groups (39±4% for NF‐LG‐SAS and 35±3% for MAS, P=0.10). After propensity score matching (n=226), NF‐LG‐SAS and MAS patients also had comparable outcomes under medical (P=0.41) and under medical and surgical management (P=0.52). NF‐LG‐SAS had better outcomes than HG‐SAS patients (adjusted hazard ratio 1.84 [95% CI, 1.18‐2.88]; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that patients with NF‐LG‐SAS have a comparable outcome to those with MAS when aortic valve replacement is performed during follow‐up according to guidelines, mostly at the stage of HG‐SAS. Rigorous echocardiographic assessment to rule out measurement errors and close follow‐up are essential to detect progression to true severe AS in NF‐LG‐SAS. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6806034/ /pubmed/31550970 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.012301 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Chadha, Gagandeep
Bohbot, Yohann
Rusinaru, Dan
Maréchaux, Sylvestre
Tribouilloy, Christophe
Outcome of Normal‐Flow Low‐Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis With Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction: A Propensity‐Matched Study
title Outcome of Normal‐Flow Low‐Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis With Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction: A Propensity‐Matched Study
title_full Outcome of Normal‐Flow Low‐Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis With Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction: A Propensity‐Matched Study
title_fullStr Outcome of Normal‐Flow Low‐Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis With Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction: A Propensity‐Matched Study
title_full_unstemmed Outcome of Normal‐Flow Low‐Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis With Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction: A Propensity‐Matched Study
title_short Outcome of Normal‐Flow Low‐Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis With Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction: A Propensity‐Matched Study
title_sort outcome of normal‐flow low‐gradient severe aortic stenosis with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: a propensity‐matched study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6806034/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31550970
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.012301
work_keys_str_mv AT chadhagagandeep outcomeofnormalflowlowgradientsevereaorticstenosiswithpreservedleftventricularejectionfractionapropensitymatchedstudy
AT bohbotyohann outcomeofnormalflowlowgradientsevereaorticstenosiswithpreservedleftventricularejectionfractionapropensitymatchedstudy
AT rusinarudan outcomeofnormalflowlowgradientsevereaorticstenosiswithpreservedleftventricularejectionfractionapropensitymatchedstudy
AT marechauxsylvestre outcomeofnormalflowlowgradientsevereaorticstenosiswithpreservedleftventricularejectionfractionapropensitymatchedstudy
AT tribouilloychristophe outcomeofnormalflowlowgradientsevereaorticstenosiswithpreservedleftventricularejectionfractionapropensitymatchedstudy