Cargando…
Are Existing Monocular Computer Vision-Based 3D Motion Capture Approaches Ready for Deployment? A Methodological Study on the Example of Alpine Skiing
In this study, we compared a monocular computer vision (MCV)-based approach with the golden standard for collecting kinematic data on ski tracks (i.e., video-based stereophotogrammetry) and assessed its deployment readiness for answering applied research questions in the context of alpine skiing. Th...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6806076/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31590465 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19194323 |
_version_ | 1783461544989818880 |
---|---|
author | Ostrek, Mirela Rhodin, Helge Fua, Pascal Müller, Erich Spörri, Jörg |
author_facet | Ostrek, Mirela Rhodin, Helge Fua, Pascal Müller, Erich Spörri, Jörg |
author_sort | Ostrek, Mirela |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this study, we compared a monocular computer vision (MCV)-based approach with the golden standard for collecting kinematic data on ski tracks (i.e., video-based stereophotogrammetry) and assessed its deployment readiness for answering applied research questions in the context of alpine skiing. The investigated MCV-based approach predicted the three-dimensional human pose and ski orientation based on the image data from a single camera. The data set used for training and testing the underlying deep nets originated from a field experiment with six competitive alpine skiers. The normalized mean per joint position error of the MVC-based approach was found to be 0.08 ± 0.01 m. Knee flexion showed an accuracy and precision (in parenthesis) of 0.4 ± 7.1° (7.2 ± 1.5°) for the outside leg, and −0.2 ± 5.0° (6.7 ± 1.1°) for the inside leg. For hip flexion, the corresponding values were −0.4 ± 6.1° (4.4° ± 1.5°) and −0.7 ± 4.7° (3.7 ± 1.0°), respectively. The accuracy and precision of skiing-related metrics were revealed to be 0.03 ± 0.01 m (0.01 ± 0.00 m) for relative center of mass position, −0.1 ± 3.8° (3.4 ± 0.9) for lean angle, 0.01 ± 0.03 m (0.02 ± 0.01 m) for center of mass to outside ankle distance, 0.01 ± 0.05 m (0.03 ± 0.01 m) for fore/aft position, and 0.00 ± 0.01 m(2) (0.01 ± 0.00 m(2)) for drag area. Such magnitudes can be considered acceptable for detecting relevant differences in the context of alpine skiing. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6806076 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68060762019-11-07 Are Existing Monocular Computer Vision-Based 3D Motion Capture Approaches Ready for Deployment? A Methodological Study on the Example of Alpine Skiing Ostrek, Mirela Rhodin, Helge Fua, Pascal Müller, Erich Spörri, Jörg Sensors (Basel) Article In this study, we compared a monocular computer vision (MCV)-based approach with the golden standard for collecting kinematic data on ski tracks (i.e., video-based stereophotogrammetry) and assessed its deployment readiness for answering applied research questions in the context of alpine skiing. The investigated MCV-based approach predicted the three-dimensional human pose and ski orientation based on the image data from a single camera. The data set used for training and testing the underlying deep nets originated from a field experiment with six competitive alpine skiers. The normalized mean per joint position error of the MVC-based approach was found to be 0.08 ± 0.01 m. Knee flexion showed an accuracy and precision (in parenthesis) of 0.4 ± 7.1° (7.2 ± 1.5°) for the outside leg, and −0.2 ± 5.0° (6.7 ± 1.1°) for the inside leg. For hip flexion, the corresponding values were −0.4 ± 6.1° (4.4° ± 1.5°) and −0.7 ± 4.7° (3.7 ± 1.0°), respectively. The accuracy and precision of skiing-related metrics were revealed to be 0.03 ± 0.01 m (0.01 ± 0.00 m) for relative center of mass position, −0.1 ± 3.8° (3.4 ± 0.9) for lean angle, 0.01 ± 0.03 m (0.02 ± 0.01 m) for center of mass to outside ankle distance, 0.01 ± 0.05 m (0.03 ± 0.01 m) for fore/aft position, and 0.00 ± 0.01 m(2) (0.01 ± 0.00 m(2)) for drag area. Such magnitudes can be considered acceptable for detecting relevant differences in the context of alpine skiing. MDPI 2019-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6806076/ /pubmed/31590465 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19194323 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Ostrek, Mirela Rhodin, Helge Fua, Pascal Müller, Erich Spörri, Jörg Are Existing Monocular Computer Vision-Based 3D Motion Capture Approaches Ready for Deployment? A Methodological Study on the Example of Alpine Skiing |
title | Are Existing Monocular Computer Vision-Based 3D Motion Capture Approaches Ready for Deployment? A Methodological Study on the Example of Alpine Skiing |
title_full | Are Existing Monocular Computer Vision-Based 3D Motion Capture Approaches Ready for Deployment? A Methodological Study on the Example of Alpine Skiing |
title_fullStr | Are Existing Monocular Computer Vision-Based 3D Motion Capture Approaches Ready for Deployment? A Methodological Study on the Example of Alpine Skiing |
title_full_unstemmed | Are Existing Monocular Computer Vision-Based 3D Motion Capture Approaches Ready for Deployment? A Methodological Study on the Example of Alpine Skiing |
title_short | Are Existing Monocular Computer Vision-Based 3D Motion Capture Approaches Ready for Deployment? A Methodological Study on the Example of Alpine Skiing |
title_sort | are existing monocular computer vision-based 3d motion capture approaches ready for deployment? a methodological study on the example of alpine skiing |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6806076/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31590465 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19194323 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ostrekmirela areexistingmonocularcomputervisionbased3dmotioncaptureapproachesreadyfordeploymentamethodologicalstudyontheexampleofalpineskiing AT rhodinhelge areexistingmonocularcomputervisionbased3dmotioncaptureapproachesreadyfordeploymentamethodologicalstudyontheexampleofalpineskiing AT fuapascal areexistingmonocularcomputervisionbased3dmotioncaptureapproachesreadyfordeploymentamethodologicalstudyontheexampleofalpineskiing AT mullererich areexistingmonocularcomputervisionbased3dmotioncaptureapproachesreadyfordeploymentamethodologicalstudyontheexampleofalpineskiing AT sporrijorg areexistingmonocularcomputervisionbased3dmotioncaptureapproachesreadyfordeploymentamethodologicalstudyontheexampleofalpineskiing |