Cargando…

Efficient quality assurance method with automated data acquisition of a single phantom setup to determine radiation and imaging isocenter congruence

We developed a quality assurance (QA) method to determine the isocenter congruence of Optical Surface Monitoring System (OSMS, Varian, CA, USA), kilovoltage (kV), and megavoltage (MV) imaging, and the radiation isocenter using a single setup of the OSMS phantom for frameless Stereotactic Radiosurger...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kang, Hyejoo, Patel, Rakesh, Roeske, John C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6806465/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31535781
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12723
_version_ 1783461633157234688
author Kang, Hyejoo
Patel, Rakesh
Roeske, John C.
author_facet Kang, Hyejoo
Patel, Rakesh
Roeske, John C.
author_sort Kang, Hyejoo
collection PubMed
description We developed a quality assurance (QA) method to determine the isocenter congruence of Optical Surface Monitoring System (OSMS, Varian, CA, USA), kilovoltage (kV), and megavoltage (MV) imaging, and the radiation isocenter using a single setup of the OSMS phantom for frameless Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) treatment. After aligning the phantom to the OSMS isocenter, a cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) of the phantom was acquired and registered to a computed tomography (CT) scan of the phantom to determine the CBCT isocenter. Without moving the phantom, MV and kV images were simultaneously acquired at four gantry angles to localize MV and kV isocenters. Then, Winston‐Lutz (W‐L) test images of the central BB in the phantom were acquired to analyze the radiation isocenter. The gantry and couch were automatically controlled using the TrueBeam Developer Mode during MV, kV, and W‐L image acquisition. All the images were acquired weekly for 17 weeks to track the congruence of all the imaging modalities' isocenter in six‐dimensional (6D) translations and rotations, and the radiation isocenter in three‐dimensional (3D) translations. The shifts of isocenters of all imaging modalities and the radiation isocenter from the OSMS isocenter were within 0.2 mm and 0.2° on average over 17 weeks. The maximum discrepancy between OSMS and other imaging modalities or radiation isocenters was 0.8 mm and 0.3°. However, systematic shifts of radiation isocenter anteriorly and laterally relative to the OSMS isocenter were observed. The measured discrepancies were consistent from week‐to‐week except for two weeks when the isocenter discrepancies of 0.8 mm were noted due to drifts of the OSMS isocenter. Once recalibration was performed on OSMS, the discrepancy was reduced to 0.3 mm and 0.2°.By performing the proposed QA on a weekly basis, the isocenter congruencies of multiple imaging systems and radiation isocenter were validated for a linear accelerator.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6806465
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68064652019-10-28 Efficient quality assurance method with automated data acquisition of a single phantom setup to determine radiation and imaging isocenter congruence Kang, Hyejoo Patel, Rakesh Roeske, John C. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics We developed a quality assurance (QA) method to determine the isocenter congruence of Optical Surface Monitoring System (OSMS, Varian, CA, USA), kilovoltage (kV), and megavoltage (MV) imaging, and the radiation isocenter using a single setup of the OSMS phantom for frameless Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) treatment. After aligning the phantom to the OSMS isocenter, a cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) of the phantom was acquired and registered to a computed tomography (CT) scan of the phantom to determine the CBCT isocenter. Without moving the phantom, MV and kV images were simultaneously acquired at four gantry angles to localize MV and kV isocenters. Then, Winston‐Lutz (W‐L) test images of the central BB in the phantom were acquired to analyze the radiation isocenter. The gantry and couch were automatically controlled using the TrueBeam Developer Mode during MV, kV, and W‐L image acquisition. All the images were acquired weekly for 17 weeks to track the congruence of all the imaging modalities' isocenter in six‐dimensional (6D) translations and rotations, and the radiation isocenter in three‐dimensional (3D) translations. The shifts of isocenters of all imaging modalities and the radiation isocenter from the OSMS isocenter were within 0.2 mm and 0.2° on average over 17 weeks. The maximum discrepancy between OSMS and other imaging modalities or radiation isocenters was 0.8 mm and 0.3°. However, systematic shifts of radiation isocenter anteriorly and laterally relative to the OSMS isocenter were observed. The measured discrepancies were consistent from week‐to‐week except for two weeks when the isocenter discrepancies of 0.8 mm were noted due to drifts of the OSMS isocenter. Once recalibration was performed on OSMS, the discrepancy was reduced to 0.3 mm and 0.2°.By performing the proposed QA on a weekly basis, the isocenter congruencies of multiple imaging systems and radiation isocenter were validated for a linear accelerator. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6806465/ /pubmed/31535781 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12723 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Kang, Hyejoo
Patel, Rakesh
Roeske, John C.
Efficient quality assurance method with automated data acquisition of a single phantom setup to determine radiation and imaging isocenter congruence
title Efficient quality assurance method with automated data acquisition of a single phantom setup to determine radiation and imaging isocenter congruence
title_full Efficient quality assurance method with automated data acquisition of a single phantom setup to determine radiation and imaging isocenter congruence
title_fullStr Efficient quality assurance method with automated data acquisition of a single phantom setup to determine radiation and imaging isocenter congruence
title_full_unstemmed Efficient quality assurance method with automated data acquisition of a single phantom setup to determine radiation and imaging isocenter congruence
title_short Efficient quality assurance method with automated data acquisition of a single phantom setup to determine radiation and imaging isocenter congruence
title_sort efficient quality assurance method with automated data acquisition of a single phantom setup to determine radiation and imaging isocenter congruence
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6806465/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31535781
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12723
work_keys_str_mv AT kanghyejoo efficientqualityassurancemethodwithautomateddataacquisitionofasinglephantomsetuptodetermineradiationandimagingisocentercongruence
AT patelrakesh efficientqualityassurancemethodwithautomateddataacquisitionofasinglephantomsetuptodetermineradiationandimagingisocentercongruence
AT roeskejohnc efficientqualityassurancemethodwithautomateddataacquisitionofasinglephantomsetuptodetermineradiationandimagingisocentercongruence