Cargando…
Validation of the RayStation Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm using realistic animal tissue phantoms
PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to validate the RayStation Monte Carlo (MC) dose algorithm using animal tissue neck phantoms and a water breast phantom. METHODS: Three anthropomorphic phantoms were used in a clinical setting to test the RayStation MC dose algorithm. We used two real animal necks t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6806482/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31541536 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12733 |
_version_ | 1783461637096734720 |
---|---|
author | Schreuder, Andries N. Bridges, Daniel S. Rigsby, Lauren Blakey, Marc Janson, Martin Hedrick, Samantha G. Wilkinson, John B. |
author_facet | Schreuder, Andries N. Bridges, Daniel S. Rigsby, Lauren Blakey, Marc Janson, Martin Hedrick, Samantha G. Wilkinson, John B. |
author_sort | Schreuder, Andries N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to validate the RayStation Monte Carlo (MC) dose algorithm using animal tissue neck phantoms and a water breast phantom. METHODS: Three anthropomorphic phantoms were used in a clinical setting to test the RayStation MC dose algorithm. We used two real animal necks that were cut to a workable shape while frozen and then thawed before being CT scanned. Secondly, we made a patient breast phantom using a breast prosthesis filled with water and placed on a flat surface. Dose distributions in the animal and breast phantoms were measured using the MatriXX PT device. RESULTS: The measured doses to the neck and breast phantoms compared exceptionally well with doses calculated by the analytical pencil beam (APB) and MC algorithms. The comparisons between APB and MC dose calculations and MatriXX PT measurements yielded an average depth difference for best gamma agreement of <1 mm for the neck phantoms. For the breast phantom better average gamma pass rates between measured and calculated dose distributions were observed for the MC than for the APB algorithms. CONCLUSIONS: The MC dose calculations are more accurate than the APB calculations for the static phantoms conditions we evaluated, especially in areas where significant inhomogeneous interfaces are traversed by the beam. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6806482 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68064822019-10-28 Validation of the RayStation Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm using realistic animal tissue phantoms Schreuder, Andries N. Bridges, Daniel S. Rigsby, Lauren Blakey, Marc Janson, Martin Hedrick, Samantha G. Wilkinson, John B. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to validate the RayStation Monte Carlo (MC) dose algorithm using animal tissue neck phantoms and a water breast phantom. METHODS: Three anthropomorphic phantoms were used in a clinical setting to test the RayStation MC dose algorithm. We used two real animal necks that were cut to a workable shape while frozen and then thawed before being CT scanned. Secondly, we made a patient breast phantom using a breast prosthesis filled with water and placed on a flat surface. Dose distributions in the animal and breast phantoms were measured using the MatriXX PT device. RESULTS: The measured doses to the neck and breast phantoms compared exceptionally well with doses calculated by the analytical pencil beam (APB) and MC algorithms. The comparisons between APB and MC dose calculations and MatriXX PT measurements yielded an average depth difference for best gamma agreement of <1 mm for the neck phantoms. For the breast phantom better average gamma pass rates between measured and calculated dose distributions were observed for the MC than for the APB algorithms. CONCLUSIONS: The MC dose calculations are more accurate than the APB calculations for the static phantoms conditions we evaluated, especially in areas where significant inhomogeneous interfaces are traversed by the beam. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6806482/ /pubmed/31541536 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12733 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Schreuder, Andries N. Bridges, Daniel S. Rigsby, Lauren Blakey, Marc Janson, Martin Hedrick, Samantha G. Wilkinson, John B. Validation of the RayStation Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm using realistic animal tissue phantoms |
title | Validation of the RayStation Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm using realistic animal tissue phantoms |
title_full | Validation of the RayStation Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm using realistic animal tissue phantoms |
title_fullStr | Validation of the RayStation Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm using realistic animal tissue phantoms |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of the RayStation Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm using realistic animal tissue phantoms |
title_short | Validation of the RayStation Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm using realistic animal tissue phantoms |
title_sort | validation of the raystation monte carlo dose calculation algorithm using realistic animal tissue phantoms |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6806482/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31541536 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12733 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schreuderandriesn validationoftheraystationmontecarlodosecalculationalgorithmusingrealisticanimaltissuephantoms AT bridgesdaniels validationoftheraystationmontecarlodosecalculationalgorithmusingrealisticanimaltissuephantoms AT rigsbylauren validationoftheraystationmontecarlodosecalculationalgorithmusingrealisticanimaltissuephantoms AT blakeymarc validationoftheraystationmontecarlodosecalculationalgorithmusingrealisticanimaltissuephantoms AT jansonmartin validationoftheraystationmontecarlodosecalculationalgorithmusingrealisticanimaltissuephantoms AT hedricksamanthag validationoftheraystationmontecarlodosecalculationalgorithmusingrealisticanimaltissuephantoms AT wilkinsonjohnb validationoftheraystationmontecarlodosecalculationalgorithmusingrealisticanimaltissuephantoms |