Cargando…

Validation of the RayStation Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm using realistic animal tissue phantoms

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to validate the RayStation Monte Carlo (MC) dose algorithm using animal tissue neck phantoms and a water breast phantom. METHODS: Three anthropomorphic phantoms were used in a clinical setting to test the RayStation MC dose algorithm. We used two real animal necks t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schreuder, Andries N., Bridges, Daniel S., Rigsby, Lauren, Blakey, Marc, Janson, Martin, Hedrick, Samantha G., Wilkinson, John B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6806482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31541536
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12733
_version_ 1783461637096734720
author Schreuder, Andries N.
Bridges, Daniel S.
Rigsby, Lauren
Blakey, Marc
Janson, Martin
Hedrick, Samantha G.
Wilkinson, John B.
author_facet Schreuder, Andries N.
Bridges, Daniel S.
Rigsby, Lauren
Blakey, Marc
Janson, Martin
Hedrick, Samantha G.
Wilkinson, John B.
author_sort Schreuder, Andries N.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to validate the RayStation Monte Carlo (MC) dose algorithm using animal tissue neck phantoms and a water breast phantom. METHODS: Three anthropomorphic phantoms were used in a clinical setting to test the RayStation MC dose algorithm. We used two real animal necks that were cut to a workable shape while frozen and then thawed before being CT scanned. Secondly, we made a patient breast phantom using a breast prosthesis filled with water and placed on a flat surface. Dose distributions in the animal and breast phantoms were measured using the MatriXX PT device. RESULTS: The measured doses to the neck and breast phantoms compared exceptionally well with doses calculated by the analytical pencil beam (APB) and MC algorithms. The comparisons between APB and MC dose calculations and MatriXX PT measurements yielded an average depth difference for best gamma agreement of <1 mm for the neck phantoms. For the breast phantom better average gamma pass rates between measured and calculated dose distributions were observed for the MC than for the APB algorithms. CONCLUSIONS: The MC dose calculations are more accurate than the APB calculations for the static phantoms conditions we evaluated, especially in areas where significant inhomogeneous interfaces are traversed by the beam.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6806482
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68064822019-10-28 Validation of the RayStation Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm using realistic animal tissue phantoms Schreuder, Andries N. Bridges, Daniel S. Rigsby, Lauren Blakey, Marc Janson, Martin Hedrick, Samantha G. Wilkinson, John B. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to validate the RayStation Monte Carlo (MC) dose algorithm using animal tissue neck phantoms and a water breast phantom. METHODS: Three anthropomorphic phantoms were used in a clinical setting to test the RayStation MC dose algorithm. We used two real animal necks that were cut to a workable shape while frozen and then thawed before being CT scanned. Secondly, we made a patient breast phantom using a breast prosthesis filled with water and placed on a flat surface. Dose distributions in the animal and breast phantoms were measured using the MatriXX PT device. RESULTS: The measured doses to the neck and breast phantoms compared exceptionally well with doses calculated by the analytical pencil beam (APB) and MC algorithms. The comparisons between APB and MC dose calculations and MatriXX PT measurements yielded an average depth difference for best gamma agreement of <1 mm for the neck phantoms. For the breast phantom better average gamma pass rates between measured and calculated dose distributions were observed for the MC than for the APB algorithms. CONCLUSIONS: The MC dose calculations are more accurate than the APB calculations for the static phantoms conditions we evaluated, especially in areas where significant inhomogeneous interfaces are traversed by the beam. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6806482/ /pubmed/31541536 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12733 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Schreuder, Andries N.
Bridges, Daniel S.
Rigsby, Lauren
Blakey, Marc
Janson, Martin
Hedrick, Samantha G.
Wilkinson, John B.
Validation of the RayStation Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm using realistic animal tissue phantoms
title Validation of the RayStation Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm using realistic animal tissue phantoms
title_full Validation of the RayStation Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm using realistic animal tissue phantoms
title_fullStr Validation of the RayStation Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm using realistic animal tissue phantoms
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the RayStation Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm using realistic animal tissue phantoms
title_short Validation of the RayStation Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm using realistic animal tissue phantoms
title_sort validation of the raystation monte carlo dose calculation algorithm using realistic animal tissue phantoms
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6806482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31541536
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12733
work_keys_str_mv AT schreuderandriesn validationoftheraystationmontecarlodosecalculationalgorithmusingrealisticanimaltissuephantoms
AT bridgesdaniels validationoftheraystationmontecarlodosecalculationalgorithmusingrealisticanimaltissuephantoms
AT rigsbylauren validationoftheraystationmontecarlodosecalculationalgorithmusingrealisticanimaltissuephantoms
AT blakeymarc validationoftheraystationmontecarlodosecalculationalgorithmusingrealisticanimaltissuephantoms
AT jansonmartin validationoftheraystationmontecarlodosecalculationalgorithmusingrealisticanimaltissuephantoms
AT hedricksamanthag validationoftheraystationmontecarlodosecalculationalgorithmusingrealisticanimaltissuephantoms
AT wilkinsonjohnb validationoftheraystationmontecarlodosecalculationalgorithmusingrealisticanimaltissuephantoms