Cargando…

MRI quality control for low‐field MR‐IGRT systems: Lessons learned

PURPOSE: To present lessons learned from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) quality control (QC) tests for low‐field MRI‐guided radiation therapy (MR‐IGRT) systems. METHODS: MRI QC programs were established for low‐field MRI‐(60)Co and MRI‐Linac systems. A retrospective analysis of MRI subsystem perfo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Michael Gach, H., Curcuru, Austen N., Wittland, Erin J., Maraghechi, Borna, Cai, Bin, Mutic, Sasa, Green, Olga L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6806483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31541542
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12713
_version_ 1783461637330567168
author Michael Gach, H.
Curcuru, Austen N.
Wittland, Erin J.
Maraghechi, Borna
Cai, Bin
Mutic, Sasa
Green, Olga L.
author_facet Michael Gach, H.
Curcuru, Austen N.
Wittland, Erin J.
Maraghechi, Borna
Cai, Bin
Mutic, Sasa
Green, Olga L.
author_sort Michael Gach, H.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To present lessons learned from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) quality control (QC) tests for low‐field MRI‐guided radiation therapy (MR‐IGRT) systems. METHODS: MRI QC programs were established for low‐field MRI‐(60)Co and MRI‐Linac systems. A retrospective analysis of MRI subsystem performance covered system commissioning, operations, maintenance, and quality control. Performance issues were classified into three groups: (a) Image noise and artifact; (b) Magnetic field homogeneity and linearity; and (c) System reliability and stability. RESULTS: Image noise and artifacts were attributed to room noise sources, unsatisfactory system cabling, and broken RF receiver coils. Gantry angle‐dependent magnetic field inhomogeneities were more prominent on the MRI‐Linac due to the high volume of steel shielding in the gantry. B(0) inhomogeneities measured in a 24‐cm spherical phantom were <5 ppm for both MR‐IGRT systems after using MRI gradient offset (MRI‐GO) compensation on the MRI‐Linac. However, significant signal dephasing occurred on the MRI‐Linac while the gantry was rotating. Spatial integrity measurements were sensitive to gradient calibration and vulnerable to shimming. The most common causes of MR‐IGRT system interruptions were software disconnects between the MRI and radiation therapy delivery subsystems caused by patient table, gantry, and multi‐leaf collimator (MLC) faults. The standard deviation (SD) of the receiver coil signal‐to‐noise ratio was 1.83 for the MRI‐(60)Co and 1.53 for the MRI‐Linac. The SD of the deviation from the mean for the Larmor frequency was 1.41 ppm for the MRI‐(60)Co and 1.54 ppm for the MRI‐Linac. The SD of the deviation from the mean for the transmitter reference amplitude was 0.90% for the MRI‐(60)Co and 1.68% for the MRI‐Linac. High SDs in image stability data corresponded to reports of spike noise. CONCLUSIONS: There are significant technological challenges associated with implementing and maintaining MR‐IGRT systems. Most of the performance issues were identified and resolved during commissioning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6806483
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68064832019-10-28 MRI quality control for low‐field MR‐IGRT systems: Lessons learned Michael Gach, H. Curcuru, Austen N. Wittland, Erin J. Maraghechi, Borna Cai, Bin Mutic, Sasa Green, Olga L. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: To present lessons learned from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) quality control (QC) tests for low‐field MRI‐guided radiation therapy (MR‐IGRT) systems. METHODS: MRI QC programs were established for low‐field MRI‐(60)Co and MRI‐Linac systems. A retrospective analysis of MRI subsystem performance covered system commissioning, operations, maintenance, and quality control. Performance issues were classified into three groups: (a) Image noise and artifact; (b) Magnetic field homogeneity and linearity; and (c) System reliability and stability. RESULTS: Image noise and artifacts were attributed to room noise sources, unsatisfactory system cabling, and broken RF receiver coils. Gantry angle‐dependent magnetic field inhomogeneities were more prominent on the MRI‐Linac due to the high volume of steel shielding in the gantry. B(0) inhomogeneities measured in a 24‐cm spherical phantom were <5 ppm for both MR‐IGRT systems after using MRI gradient offset (MRI‐GO) compensation on the MRI‐Linac. However, significant signal dephasing occurred on the MRI‐Linac while the gantry was rotating. Spatial integrity measurements were sensitive to gradient calibration and vulnerable to shimming. The most common causes of MR‐IGRT system interruptions were software disconnects between the MRI and radiation therapy delivery subsystems caused by patient table, gantry, and multi‐leaf collimator (MLC) faults. The standard deviation (SD) of the receiver coil signal‐to‐noise ratio was 1.83 for the MRI‐(60)Co and 1.53 for the MRI‐Linac. The SD of the deviation from the mean for the Larmor frequency was 1.41 ppm for the MRI‐(60)Co and 1.54 ppm for the MRI‐Linac. The SD of the deviation from the mean for the transmitter reference amplitude was 0.90% for the MRI‐(60)Co and 1.68% for the MRI‐Linac. High SDs in image stability data corresponded to reports of spike noise. CONCLUSIONS: There are significant technological challenges associated with implementing and maintaining MR‐IGRT systems. Most of the performance issues were identified and resolved during commissioning. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6806483/ /pubmed/31541542 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12713 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Michael Gach, H.
Curcuru, Austen N.
Wittland, Erin J.
Maraghechi, Borna
Cai, Bin
Mutic, Sasa
Green, Olga L.
MRI quality control for low‐field MR‐IGRT systems: Lessons learned
title MRI quality control for low‐field MR‐IGRT systems: Lessons learned
title_full MRI quality control for low‐field MR‐IGRT systems: Lessons learned
title_fullStr MRI quality control for low‐field MR‐IGRT systems: Lessons learned
title_full_unstemmed MRI quality control for low‐field MR‐IGRT systems: Lessons learned
title_short MRI quality control for low‐field MR‐IGRT systems: Lessons learned
title_sort mri quality control for low‐field mr‐igrt systems: lessons learned
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6806483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31541542
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12713
work_keys_str_mv AT michaelgachh mriqualitycontrolforlowfieldmrigrtsystemslessonslearned
AT curcuruaustenn mriqualitycontrolforlowfieldmrigrtsystemslessonslearned
AT wittlanderinj mriqualitycontrolforlowfieldmrigrtsystemslessonslearned
AT maraghechiborna mriqualitycontrolforlowfieldmrigrtsystemslessonslearned
AT caibin mriqualitycontrolforlowfieldmrigrtsystemslessonslearned
AT muticsasa mriqualitycontrolforlowfieldmrigrtsystemslessonslearned
AT greenolgal mriqualitycontrolforlowfieldmrigrtsystemslessonslearned