Cargando…

Comparison of postoperative pain between patients who underwent primary and repeated cesarean section: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: The differences in post-operative pain are unclear between the primiparas who underwent a primary cesarean section and multiparas who underwent their first repeat cesarean section. The study aimed to explore the possible differences in postoperative pain between primiparas and multiparas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Duan, Guangyou, Yang, Guiying, Peng, Jing, Duan, Zhenxin, Li, Jie, Tang, Xianglong, Li, Hong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6806491/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31640565
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-019-0865-9
_version_ 1783461639238975488
author Duan, Guangyou
Yang, Guiying
Peng, Jing
Duan, Zhenxin
Li, Jie
Tang, Xianglong
Li, Hong
author_facet Duan, Guangyou
Yang, Guiying
Peng, Jing
Duan, Zhenxin
Li, Jie
Tang, Xianglong
Li, Hong
author_sort Duan, Guangyou
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The differences in post-operative pain are unclear between the primiparas who underwent a primary cesarean section and multiparas who underwent their first repeat cesarean section. The study aimed to explore the possible differences in postoperative pain between primiparas and multiparas. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was performed only including women who underwent cesarean deliveries under spinal anesthesia. Postoperative patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) was administered to all subjects with 0.2 mg/kg hydromorphone and 4 mg/kg flurbiprofen; the pump was programmed as 2.0 mL/h background infusion with a loading dose of 1 mL and a lockout period of 15 min. Postoperative incision and visceral pain intensity were evaluated using the visual analogue scale, and inadequate analgesia was defined as a visual analogue scale score ≥ 40 during 48 h post-operation. Additionally, the patients’ pain statuses in postoperative week 1 and week 4 were also assessed during follow-up via telephone. RESULTS: From January to May 2017, a total of 168 patients (67 primiparas and 101 multiparas) were included. The relative risk for multiparas to experience inadequate analgesia on incision pain was 0.42 (95% CI: 0.25 to 0.74) compared to primiparas. In patients aged < 30 years, inadequate analgesia on visceral pain was higher in multiparas than in primiparas (RR, 3.56 [1.05 to 12.04], P = 0.025). There was no significant difference in the combined incidence of inadequate analgesia in both types of pain between the multiparas and primiparas (33.7% vs. 40.2%, P = 0.381). No difference was found in PCIA use between the two groups (111.1 ± 36.0 mL vs. 110.9 ± 37.3 mL, P = 0.979). In addition, a significantly higher incidence of pain was noted 4 weeks post-surgery in primiparas than that in multiparas (62.2% vs. 37.7%, P = 0.011). CONCLUSION: Multiparas who underwent their first repeat cesarean section have a lower for inadequate analgesia on incision pain during the first 48 h after surgery than primiparas. Multiparas aged under 30 years may be more prone to experiencing postoperative inadequate analgesia on visceral pain. TRAIL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT03009955, Date registered: December 30, 2016.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6806491
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68064912019-10-28 Comparison of postoperative pain between patients who underwent primary and repeated cesarean section: a prospective cohort study Duan, Guangyou Yang, Guiying Peng, Jing Duan, Zhenxin Li, Jie Tang, Xianglong Li, Hong BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: The differences in post-operative pain are unclear between the primiparas who underwent a primary cesarean section and multiparas who underwent their first repeat cesarean section. The study aimed to explore the possible differences in postoperative pain between primiparas and multiparas. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was performed only including women who underwent cesarean deliveries under spinal anesthesia. Postoperative patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) was administered to all subjects with 0.2 mg/kg hydromorphone and 4 mg/kg flurbiprofen; the pump was programmed as 2.0 mL/h background infusion with a loading dose of 1 mL and a lockout period of 15 min. Postoperative incision and visceral pain intensity were evaluated using the visual analogue scale, and inadequate analgesia was defined as a visual analogue scale score ≥ 40 during 48 h post-operation. Additionally, the patients’ pain statuses in postoperative week 1 and week 4 were also assessed during follow-up via telephone. RESULTS: From January to May 2017, a total of 168 patients (67 primiparas and 101 multiparas) were included. The relative risk for multiparas to experience inadequate analgesia on incision pain was 0.42 (95% CI: 0.25 to 0.74) compared to primiparas. In patients aged < 30 years, inadequate analgesia on visceral pain was higher in multiparas than in primiparas (RR, 3.56 [1.05 to 12.04], P = 0.025). There was no significant difference in the combined incidence of inadequate analgesia in both types of pain between the multiparas and primiparas (33.7% vs. 40.2%, P = 0.381). No difference was found in PCIA use between the two groups (111.1 ± 36.0 mL vs. 110.9 ± 37.3 mL, P = 0.979). In addition, a significantly higher incidence of pain was noted 4 weeks post-surgery in primiparas than that in multiparas (62.2% vs. 37.7%, P = 0.011). CONCLUSION: Multiparas who underwent their first repeat cesarean section have a lower for inadequate analgesia on incision pain during the first 48 h after surgery than primiparas. Multiparas aged under 30 years may be more prone to experiencing postoperative inadequate analgesia on visceral pain. TRAIL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT03009955, Date registered: December 30, 2016. BioMed Central 2019-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6806491/ /pubmed/31640565 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-019-0865-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Duan, Guangyou
Yang, Guiying
Peng, Jing
Duan, Zhenxin
Li, Jie
Tang, Xianglong
Li, Hong
Comparison of postoperative pain between patients who underwent primary and repeated cesarean section: a prospective cohort study
title Comparison of postoperative pain between patients who underwent primary and repeated cesarean section: a prospective cohort study
title_full Comparison of postoperative pain between patients who underwent primary and repeated cesarean section: a prospective cohort study
title_fullStr Comparison of postoperative pain between patients who underwent primary and repeated cesarean section: a prospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of postoperative pain between patients who underwent primary and repeated cesarean section: a prospective cohort study
title_short Comparison of postoperative pain between patients who underwent primary and repeated cesarean section: a prospective cohort study
title_sort comparison of postoperative pain between patients who underwent primary and repeated cesarean section: a prospective cohort study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6806491/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31640565
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-019-0865-9
work_keys_str_mv AT duanguangyou comparisonofpostoperativepainbetweenpatientswhounderwentprimaryandrepeatedcesareansectionaprospectivecohortstudy
AT yangguiying comparisonofpostoperativepainbetweenpatientswhounderwentprimaryandrepeatedcesareansectionaprospectivecohortstudy
AT pengjing comparisonofpostoperativepainbetweenpatientswhounderwentprimaryandrepeatedcesareansectionaprospectivecohortstudy
AT duanzhenxin comparisonofpostoperativepainbetweenpatientswhounderwentprimaryandrepeatedcesareansectionaprospectivecohortstudy
AT lijie comparisonofpostoperativepainbetweenpatientswhounderwentprimaryandrepeatedcesareansectionaprospectivecohortstudy
AT tangxianglong comparisonofpostoperativepainbetweenpatientswhounderwentprimaryandrepeatedcesareansectionaprospectivecohortstudy
AT lihong comparisonofpostoperativepainbetweenpatientswhounderwentprimaryandrepeatedcesareansectionaprospectivecohortstudy