Cargando…
Comparison of postoperative pain between patients who underwent primary and repeated cesarean section: a prospective cohort study
BACKGROUND: The differences in post-operative pain are unclear between the primiparas who underwent a primary cesarean section and multiparas who underwent their first repeat cesarean section. The study aimed to explore the possible differences in postoperative pain between primiparas and multiparas...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6806491/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31640565 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-019-0865-9 |
_version_ | 1783461639238975488 |
---|---|
author | Duan, Guangyou Yang, Guiying Peng, Jing Duan, Zhenxin Li, Jie Tang, Xianglong Li, Hong |
author_facet | Duan, Guangyou Yang, Guiying Peng, Jing Duan, Zhenxin Li, Jie Tang, Xianglong Li, Hong |
author_sort | Duan, Guangyou |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The differences in post-operative pain are unclear between the primiparas who underwent a primary cesarean section and multiparas who underwent their first repeat cesarean section. The study aimed to explore the possible differences in postoperative pain between primiparas and multiparas. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was performed only including women who underwent cesarean deliveries under spinal anesthesia. Postoperative patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) was administered to all subjects with 0.2 mg/kg hydromorphone and 4 mg/kg flurbiprofen; the pump was programmed as 2.0 mL/h background infusion with a loading dose of 1 mL and a lockout period of 15 min. Postoperative incision and visceral pain intensity were evaluated using the visual analogue scale, and inadequate analgesia was defined as a visual analogue scale score ≥ 40 during 48 h post-operation. Additionally, the patients’ pain statuses in postoperative week 1 and week 4 were also assessed during follow-up via telephone. RESULTS: From January to May 2017, a total of 168 patients (67 primiparas and 101 multiparas) were included. The relative risk for multiparas to experience inadequate analgesia on incision pain was 0.42 (95% CI: 0.25 to 0.74) compared to primiparas. In patients aged < 30 years, inadequate analgesia on visceral pain was higher in multiparas than in primiparas (RR, 3.56 [1.05 to 12.04], P = 0.025). There was no significant difference in the combined incidence of inadequate analgesia in both types of pain between the multiparas and primiparas (33.7% vs. 40.2%, P = 0.381). No difference was found in PCIA use between the two groups (111.1 ± 36.0 mL vs. 110.9 ± 37.3 mL, P = 0.979). In addition, a significantly higher incidence of pain was noted 4 weeks post-surgery in primiparas than that in multiparas (62.2% vs. 37.7%, P = 0.011). CONCLUSION: Multiparas who underwent their first repeat cesarean section have a lower for inadequate analgesia on incision pain during the first 48 h after surgery than primiparas. Multiparas aged under 30 years may be more prone to experiencing postoperative inadequate analgesia on visceral pain. TRAIL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT03009955, Date registered: December 30, 2016. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6806491 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68064912019-10-28 Comparison of postoperative pain between patients who underwent primary and repeated cesarean section: a prospective cohort study Duan, Guangyou Yang, Guiying Peng, Jing Duan, Zhenxin Li, Jie Tang, Xianglong Li, Hong BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: The differences in post-operative pain are unclear between the primiparas who underwent a primary cesarean section and multiparas who underwent their first repeat cesarean section. The study aimed to explore the possible differences in postoperative pain between primiparas and multiparas. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was performed only including women who underwent cesarean deliveries under spinal anesthesia. Postoperative patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) was administered to all subjects with 0.2 mg/kg hydromorphone and 4 mg/kg flurbiprofen; the pump was programmed as 2.0 mL/h background infusion with a loading dose of 1 mL and a lockout period of 15 min. Postoperative incision and visceral pain intensity were evaluated using the visual analogue scale, and inadequate analgesia was defined as a visual analogue scale score ≥ 40 during 48 h post-operation. Additionally, the patients’ pain statuses in postoperative week 1 and week 4 were also assessed during follow-up via telephone. RESULTS: From January to May 2017, a total of 168 patients (67 primiparas and 101 multiparas) were included. The relative risk for multiparas to experience inadequate analgesia on incision pain was 0.42 (95% CI: 0.25 to 0.74) compared to primiparas. In patients aged < 30 years, inadequate analgesia on visceral pain was higher in multiparas than in primiparas (RR, 3.56 [1.05 to 12.04], P = 0.025). There was no significant difference in the combined incidence of inadequate analgesia in both types of pain between the multiparas and primiparas (33.7% vs. 40.2%, P = 0.381). No difference was found in PCIA use between the two groups (111.1 ± 36.0 mL vs. 110.9 ± 37.3 mL, P = 0.979). In addition, a significantly higher incidence of pain was noted 4 weeks post-surgery in primiparas than that in multiparas (62.2% vs. 37.7%, P = 0.011). CONCLUSION: Multiparas who underwent their first repeat cesarean section have a lower for inadequate analgesia on incision pain during the first 48 h after surgery than primiparas. Multiparas aged under 30 years may be more prone to experiencing postoperative inadequate analgesia on visceral pain. TRAIL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT03009955, Date registered: December 30, 2016. BioMed Central 2019-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6806491/ /pubmed/31640565 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-019-0865-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Duan, Guangyou Yang, Guiying Peng, Jing Duan, Zhenxin Li, Jie Tang, Xianglong Li, Hong Comparison of postoperative pain between patients who underwent primary and repeated cesarean section: a prospective cohort study |
title | Comparison of postoperative pain between patients who underwent primary and repeated cesarean section: a prospective cohort study |
title_full | Comparison of postoperative pain between patients who underwent primary and repeated cesarean section: a prospective cohort study |
title_fullStr | Comparison of postoperative pain between patients who underwent primary and repeated cesarean section: a prospective cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of postoperative pain between patients who underwent primary and repeated cesarean section: a prospective cohort study |
title_short | Comparison of postoperative pain between patients who underwent primary and repeated cesarean section: a prospective cohort study |
title_sort | comparison of postoperative pain between patients who underwent primary and repeated cesarean section: a prospective cohort study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6806491/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31640565 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-019-0865-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT duanguangyou comparisonofpostoperativepainbetweenpatientswhounderwentprimaryandrepeatedcesareansectionaprospectivecohortstudy AT yangguiying comparisonofpostoperativepainbetweenpatientswhounderwentprimaryandrepeatedcesareansectionaprospectivecohortstudy AT pengjing comparisonofpostoperativepainbetweenpatientswhounderwentprimaryandrepeatedcesareansectionaprospectivecohortstudy AT duanzhenxin comparisonofpostoperativepainbetweenpatientswhounderwentprimaryandrepeatedcesareansectionaprospectivecohortstudy AT lijie comparisonofpostoperativepainbetweenpatientswhounderwentprimaryandrepeatedcesareansectionaprospectivecohortstudy AT tangxianglong comparisonofpostoperativepainbetweenpatientswhounderwentprimaryandrepeatedcesareansectionaprospectivecohortstudy AT lihong comparisonofpostoperativepainbetweenpatientswhounderwentprimaryandrepeatedcesareansectionaprospectivecohortstudy |