Cargando…
The impact of electronic prescribing systems on healthcare professionals’ working practices in the hospital setting: a systematic review and narrative synthesis
BACKGROUND: The aim of this systematic review was to synthesise peer-reviewed literature assessing the impact of electronic prescribing (eP) systems on the working practices of healthcare professionals (HCPs) in the inpatient setting and identify implications for practice and research. METHODS: We s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6806498/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31640689 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4554-7 |
_version_ | 1783461641066643456 |
---|---|
author | Mohsin-Shaikh, Soomal Furniss, Dominic Blandford, Ann McLeod, Monsey Ma, Tiantian Beykloo, Maedeh Y. Franklin, Bryony Dean |
author_facet | Mohsin-Shaikh, Soomal Furniss, Dominic Blandford, Ann McLeod, Monsey Ma, Tiantian Beykloo, Maedeh Y. Franklin, Bryony Dean |
author_sort | Mohsin-Shaikh, Soomal |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The aim of this systematic review was to synthesise peer-reviewed literature assessing the impact of electronic prescribing (eP) systems on the working practices of healthcare professionals (HCPs) in the inpatient setting and identify implications for practice and research. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Medline, Embase, Cochrane and the Cumulative Index to Nursing Allied Health Literature databases for studies published from inception to November 2018. We included controlled, uncontrolled, observational and descriptive studies that explored the effect of eP on HCPs’ working practices in an inpatient setting. Data on setting, eP system and impact on working practices were extracted. Methodological quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Emergent themes were identified and subjected to narrative synthesis. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (registration CRD42017075804). RESULTS: Searches identified 1301 titles and abstracts after duplicate removal. 171 papers underwent full-text review. A total of 25 studies met the inclusion criteria, from nine different countries. Nineteen were of commercial eP systems. There were a range of study designs; most (n = 14) adopted quantitative methods such as cross-sectional surveys, ten adopted qualitative approaches and a further one used mixed methods. Fourteen of the 25 studies were deemed to be of high quality. Four key themes were identified: communication, time taken to complete tasks, clinical workflow, and workarounds. Within each theme, study findings differed as to whether the effects of eP on HCPs’ working practices were positive or negative. CONCLUSION: There is a lack of consensus within the literature on the impact of eP on HCPs’ working practices. Future research should explore the strategies resulting in a positive impact on HCPs’ working practices and learn from those that have not been successful. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6806498 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68064982019-10-28 The impact of electronic prescribing systems on healthcare professionals’ working practices in the hospital setting: a systematic review and narrative synthesis Mohsin-Shaikh, Soomal Furniss, Dominic Blandford, Ann McLeod, Monsey Ma, Tiantian Beykloo, Maedeh Y. Franklin, Bryony Dean BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The aim of this systematic review was to synthesise peer-reviewed literature assessing the impact of electronic prescribing (eP) systems on the working practices of healthcare professionals (HCPs) in the inpatient setting and identify implications for practice and research. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Medline, Embase, Cochrane and the Cumulative Index to Nursing Allied Health Literature databases for studies published from inception to November 2018. We included controlled, uncontrolled, observational and descriptive studies that explored the effect of eP on HCPs’ working practices in an inpatient setting. Data on setting, eP system and impact on working practices were extracted. Methodological quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Emergent themes were identified and subjected to narrative synthesis. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (registration CRD42017075804). RESULTS: Searches identified 1301 titles and abstracts after duplicate removal. 171 papers underwent full-text review. A total of 25 studies met the inclusion criteria, from nine different countries. Nineteen were of commercial eP systems. There were a range of study designs; most (n = 14) adopted quantitative methods such as cross-sectional surveys, ten adopted qualitative approaches and a further one used mixed methods. Fourteen of the 25 studies were deemed to be of high quality. Four key themes were identified: communication, time taken to complete tasks, clinical workflow, and workarounds. Within each theme, study findings differed as to whether the effects of eP on HCPs’ working practices were positive or negative. CONCLUSION: There is a lack of consensus within the literature on the impact of eP on HCPs’ working practices. Future research should explore the strategies resulting in a positive impact on HCPs’ working practices and learn from those that have not been successful. BioMed Central 2019-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6806498/ /pubmed/31640689 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4554-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Mohsin-Shaikh, Soomal Furniss, Dominic Blandford, Ann McLeod, Monsey Ma, Tiantian Beykloo, Maedeh Y. Franklin, Bryony Dean The impact of electronic prescribing systems on healthcare professionals’ working practices in the hospital setting: a systematic review and narrative synthesis |
title | The impact of electronic prescribing systems on healthcare professionals’ working practices in the hospital setting: a systematic review and narrative synthesis |
title_full | The impact of electronic prescribing systems on healthcare professionals’ working practices in the hospital setting: a systematic review and narrative synthesis |
title_fullStr | The impact of electronic prescribing systems on healthcare professionals’ working practices in the hospital setting: a systematic review and narrative synthesis |
title_full_unstemmed | The impact of electronic prescribing systems on healthcare professionals’ working practices in the hospital setting: a systematic review and narrative synthesis |
title_short | The impact of electronic prescribing systems on healthcare professionals’ working practices in the hospital setting: a systematic review and narrative synthesis |
title_sort | impact of electronic prescribing systems on healthcare professionals’ working practices in the hospital setting: a systematic review and narrative synthesis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6806498/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31640689 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4554-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mohsinshaikhsoomal theimpactofelectronicprescribingsystemsonhealthcareprofessionalsworkingpracticesinthehospitalsettingasystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesis AT furnissdominic theimpactofelectronicprescribingsystemsonhealthcareprofessionalsworkingpracticesinthehospitalsettingasystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesis AT blandfordann theimpactofelectronicprescribingsystemsonhealthcareprofessionalsworkingpracticesinthehospitalsettingasystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesis AT mcleodmonsey theimpactofelectronicprescribingsystemsonhealthcareprofessionalsworkingpracticesinthehospitalsettingasystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesis AT matiantian theimpactofelectronicprescribingsystemsonhealthcareprofessionalsworkingpracticesinthehospitalsettingasystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesis AT beykloomaedehy theimpactofelectronicprescribingsystemsonhealthcareprofessionalsworkingpracticesinthehospitalsettingasystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesis AT franklinbryonydean theimpactofelectronicprescribingsystemsonhealthcareprofessionalsworkingpracticesinthehospitalsettingasystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesis AT mohsinshaikhsoomal impactofelectronicprescribingsystemsonhealthcareprofessionalsworkingpracticesinthehospitalsettingasystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesis AT furnissdominic impactofelectronicprescribingsystemsonhealthcareprofessionalsworkingpracticesinthehospitalsettingasystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesis AT blandfordann impactofelectronicprescribingsystemsonhealthcareprofessionalsworkingpracticesinthehospitalsettingasystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesis AT mcleodmonsey impactofelectronicprescribingsystemsonhealthcareprofessionalsworkingpracticesinthehospitalsettingasystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesis AT matiantian impactofelectronicprescribingsystemsonhealthcareprofessionalsworkingpracticesinthehospitalsettingasystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesis AT beykloomaedehy impactofelectronicprescribingsystemsonhealthcareprofessionalsworkingpracticesinthehospitalsettingasystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesis AT franklinbryonydean impactofelectronicprescribingsystemsonhealthcareprofessionalsworkingpracticesinthehospitalsettingasystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesis |