Cargando…
Current concepts of perioperative monitoring in high-risk surgical patients: a review
A substantial number of patients are at high-risk of intra- or post-operative complications or both. Most perioperative deaths are represented by patients who present insufficient physiological reserve to meet the demands of major surgery. Recognition and management of critical high-risk surgical pa...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6806509/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31660064 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13037-019-0213-5 |
_version_ | 1783461643817058304 |
---|---|
author | Aseni, Paolo Orsenigo, Stefano Storti, Enrico Pulici, Marco Arlati, Sergio |
author_facet | Aseni, Paolo Orsenigo, Stefano Storti, Enrico Pulici, Marco Arlati, Sergio |
author_sort | Aseni, Paolo |
collection | PubMed |
description | A substantial number of patients are at high-risk of intra- or post-operative complications or both. Most perioperative deaths are represented by patients who present insufficient physiological reserve to meet the demands of major surgery. Recognition and management of critical high-risk surgical patients require dedicated and effective teams, capable of preventing, recognize, start treatment with adequate support in time to refer patients to the satisfactory ICU level provision. The main task for health-care planners and managers is to identify and reduce this severe risk and to encourage patient’s safety practices. Inadequate tissue perfusion and decreased cellular oxygenation due to hypovolemia, heart dysfunction, reduced cardiovascular reserve, and concomitant diseases are the most common causes of perioperative complications. Hemodynamic, respiratory and careful sequential monitoring have become essential aspects of the clinical practice both for surgeons and intensivists. New monitoring techniques have changed significantly over the past few years and are now able to rapidly identify shock states earlier, define the etiology, and monitor the response to different therapies. Many of these techniques are now minimally invasive or non-invasive. Advanced hemodynamic and respiratory monitoring combines invasive, non-invasive monitoring skills. Non-invasive ultrasound has emerged during the last years as an essential operative and perioperative evaluation tool, and its use is now rapidly growing. Perioperative management guided by appropriate sequential clinical evaluation combined with respiratory and hemodynamic monitoring is an established tool to help clinicians to identify those patients at higher risk in the attempt to reduce the complications rate and potentially improve patient outcomes. This review aims to provide an update of currently available standard concepts and evolving technologies of the various respiratory and hemodynamic monitoring systems for the high-risk surgical patients, highlighting their potential usefulness when integrated with careful clinical evaluation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6806509 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68065092019-10-28 Current concepts of perioperative monitoring in high-risk surgical patients: a review Aseni, Paolo Orsenigo, Stefano Storti, Enrico Pulici, Marco Arlati, Sergio Patient Saf Surg Review A substantial number of patients are at high-risk of intra- or post-operative complications or both. Most perioperative deaths are represented by patients who present insufficient physiological reserve to meet the demands of major surgery. Recognition and management of critical high-risk surgical patients require dedicated and effective teams, capable of preventing, recognize, start treatment with adequate support in time to refer patients to the satisfactory ICU level provision. The main task for health-care planners and managers is to identify and reduce this severe risk and to encourage patient’s safety practices. Inadequate tissue perfusion and decreased cellular oxygenation due to hypovolemia, heart dysfunction, reduced cardiovascular reserve, and concomitant diseases are the most common causes of perioperative complications. Hemodynamic, respiratory and careful sequential monitoring have become essential aspects of the clinical practice both for surgeons and intensivists. New monitoring techniques have changed significantly over the past few years and are now able to rapidly identify shock states earlier, define the etiology, and monitor the response to different therapies. Many of these techniques are now minimally invasive or non-invasive. Advanced hemodynamic and respiratory monitoring combines invasive, non-invasive monitoring skills. Non-invasive ultrasound has emerged during the last years as an essential operative and perioperative evaluation tool, and its use is now rapidly growing. Perioperative management guided by appropriate sequential clinical evaluation combined with respiratory and hemodynamic monitoring is an established tool to help clinicians to identify those patients at higher risk in the attempt to reduce the complications rate and potentially improve patient outcomes. This review aims to provide an update of currently available standard concepts and evolving technologies of the various respiratory and hemodynamic monitoring systems for the high-risk surgical patients, highlighting their potential usefulness when integrated with careful clinical evaluation. BioMed Central 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6806509/ /pubmed/31660064 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13037-019-0213-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Review Aseni, Paolo Orsenigo, Stefano Storti, Enrico Pulici, Marco Arlati, Sergio Current concepts of perioperative monitoring in high-risk surgical patients: a review |
title | Current concepts of perioperative monitoring in high-risk surgical patients: a review |
title_full | Current concepts of perioperative monitoring in high-risk surgical patients: a review |
title_fullStr | Current concepts of perioperative monitoring in high-risk surgical patients: a review |
title_full_unstemmed | Current concepts of perioperative monitoring in high-risk surgical patients: a review |
title_short | Current concepts of perioperative monitoring in high-risk surgical patients: a review |
title_sort | current concepts of perioperative monitoring in high-risk surgical patients: a review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6806509/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31660064 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13037-019-0213-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT asenipaolo currentconceptsofperioperativemonitoringinhighrisksurgicalpatientsareview AT orsenigostefano currentconceptsofperioperativemonitoringinhighrisksurgicalpatientsareview AT stortienrico currentconceptsofperioperativemonitoringinhighrisksurgicalpatientsareview AT pulicimarco currentconceptsofperioperativemonitoringinhighrisksurgicalpatientsareview AT arlatisergio currentconceptsofperioperativemonitoringinhighrisksurgicalpatientsareview |