Cargando…

Fast-track multidisciplinary treatment versus conventional treatment for colorectal cancer: a multicenter, open-label randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery, fast-track perioperative treatment and XELOX chemotherapy are effective strategies for shortening the duration of hospital stay for cancer patients. This trial aimed to clarify the safety and efficacy of the fast-track multidisciplinary treatment (FTMDT) model compa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Jun, Kong, Xiang-Xing, Zhou, Jiao-Jiao, Song, Yong-Mao, Huang, Xue-Feng, Li, Gen-Hai, Ying, Xiao-Jiang, Dai, Xiao-Yu, Lu, Min, Jiang, Kai, Fu, Dong-Liang, Li, Xin-Lin, He, Jin-Jie, Wang, Jian-Wei, Sun, Li-Feng, Xu, Dong, Xu, Jing-Yan, Chen, Min, Tian, Yu, Li, Jing-Song, Yan, Min, Yuan, Ying, Ding, Ke-Feng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6806550/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31647032
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-6188-x
_version_ 1783461657836519424
author Li, Jun
Kong, Xiang-Xing
Zhou, Jiao-Jiao
Song, Yong-Mao
Huang, Xue-Feng
Li, Gen-Hai
Ying, Xiao-Jiang
Dai, Xiao-Yu
Lu, Min
Jiang, Kai
Fu, Dong-Liang
Li, Xin-Lin
He, Jin-Jie
Wang, Jian-Wei
Sun, Li-Feng
Xu, Dong
Xu, Jing-Yan
Chen, Min
Tian, Yu
Li, Jing-Song
Yan, Min
Yuan, Ying
Ding, Ke-Feng
author_facet Li, Jun
Kong, Xiang-Xing
Zhou, Jiao-Jiao
Song, Yong-Mao
Huang, Xue-Feng
Li, Gen-Hai
Ying, Xiao-Jiang
Dai, Xiao-Yu
Lu, Min
Jiang, Kai
Fu, Dong-Liang
Li, Xin-Lin
He, Jin-Jie
Wang, Jian-Wei
Sun, Li-Feng
Xu, Dong
Xu, Jing-Yan
Chen, Min
Tian, Yu
Li, Jing-Song
Yan, Min
Yuan, Ying
Ding, Ke-Feng
author_sort Li, Jun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery, fast-track perioperative treatment and XELOX chemotherapy are effective strategies for shortening the duration of hospital stay for cancer patients. This trial aimed to clarify the safety and efficacy of the fast-track multidisciplinary treatment (FTMDT) model compared to conventional surgery combined with chemotherapy in Chinese colorectal cancer patients. METHODS: This trial was a prospective randomized controlled study with a 2 × 2 balanced factorial design and was conducted at six hospitals. Patients in group 1 (FTMDT) received fast-track perioperative treatment and XELOX adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients in group 2 (conventional treatment) received conventional perioperative treatment and mFOLFOX6 adjuvant chemotherapy. Subgroups 1a and 2a had laparoscopic surgery and subgroups 1b and 2b had open surgery. The primary endpoint was total length of hospital stay during treatment. RESULTS: A total of 374 patients were randomly assigned to the four subgroups, and 342 patients were finally analyzed, including 87 patients in subgroup 1a, 85 in subgroup 1b, 86 in subgroup 2a, and 84 in subgroup 2b. The total hospital stay of group 1 was shorter than that of group 2 [13 days, (IQR, 11–17 days) vs. 23.5 days (IQR, 15–42 days), P = 0.0001]. Compared to group 2, group 1 had lower surgical costs, fewer in-hospital complications and faster recovery (all P < 0.05). Subgroup 1a showed faster surgical recovery than that of subgroup 1b (all P < 0.05). There was no difference in 5-year overall survival between groups 1 and 2 [87.1% (95% CI, 80.7–91.5%) vs. 87.1% (95% CI, 80.8–91.4%), P = 0.7420]. CONCLUSIONS: The FTMDT model, which integrates laparoscopic surgery, fast-track treatment, and XELOX chemotherapy, was the superior model for enhancing the recovery of Chinese patients with colorectal cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01080547, registered on March 4, 2010.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6806550
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68065502019-10-28 Fast-track multidisciplinary treatment versus conventional treatment for colorectal cancer: a multicenter, open-label randomized controlled study Li, Jun Kong, Xiang-Xing Zhou, Jiao-Jiao Song, Yong-Mao Huang, Xue-Feng Li, Gen-Hai Ying, Xiao-Jiang Dai, Xiao-Yu Lu, Min Jiang, Kai Fu, Dong-Liang Li, Xin-Lin He, Jin-Jie Wang, Jian-Wei Sun, Li-Feng Xu, Dong Xu, Jing-Yan Chen, Min Tian, Yu Li, Jing-Song Yan, Min Yuan, Ying Ding, Ke-Feng BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery, fast-track perioperative treatment and XELOX chemotherapy are effective strategies for shortening the duration of hospital stay for cancer patients. This trial aimed to clarify the safety and efficacy of the fast-track multidisciplinary treatment (FTMDT) model compared to conventional surgery combined with chemotherapy in Chinese colorectal cancer patients. METHODS: This trial was a prospective randomized controlled study with a 2 × 2 balanced factorial design and was conducted at six hospitals. Patients in group 1 (FTMDT) received fast-track perioperative treatment and XELOX adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients in group 2 (conventional treatment) received conventional perioperative treatment and mFOLFOX6 adjuvant chemotherapy. Subgroups 1a and 2a had laparoscopic surgery and subgroups 1b and 2b had open surgery. The primary endpoint was total length of hospital stay during treatment. RESULTS: A total of 374 patients were randomly assigned to the four subgroups, and 342 patients were finally analyzed, including 87 patients in subgroup 1a, 85 in subgroup 1b, 86 in subgroup 2a, and 84 in subgroup 2b. The total hospital stay of group 1 was shorter than that of group 2 [13 days, (IQR, 11–17 days) vs. 23.5 days (IQR, 15–42 days), P = 0.0001]. Compared to group 2, group 1 had lower surgical costs, fewer in-hospital complications and faster recovery (all P < 0.05). Subgroup 1a showed faster surgical recovery than that of subgroup 1b (all P < 0.05). There was no difference in 5-year overall survival between groups 1 and 2 [87.1% (95% CI, 80.7–91.5%) vs. 87.1% (95% CI, 80.8–91.4%), P = 0.7420]. CONCLUSIONS: The FTMDT model, which integrates laparoscopic surgery, fast-track treatment, and XELOX chemotherapy, was the superior model for enhancing the recovery of Chinese patients with colorectal cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01080547, registered on March 4, 2010. BioMed Central 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6806550/ /pubmed/31647032 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-6188-x Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Li, Jun
Kong, Xiang-Xing
Zhou, Jiao-Jiao
Song, Yong-Mao
Huang, Xue-Feng
Li, Gen-Hai
Ying, Xiao-Jiang
Dai, Xiao-Yu
Lu, Min
Jiang, Kai
Fu, Dong-Liang
Li, Xin-Lin
He, Jin-Jie
Wang, Jian-Wei
Sun, Li-Feng
Xu, Dong
Xu, Jing-Yan
Chen, Min
Tian, Yu
Li, Jing-Song
Yan, Min
Yuan, Ying
Ding, Ke-Feng
Fast-track multidisciplinary treatment versus conventional treatment for colorectal cancer: a multicenter, open-label randomized controlled study
title Fast-track multidisciplinary treatment versus conventional treatment for colorectal cancer: a multicenter, open-label randomized controlled study
title_full Fast-track multidisciplinary treatment versus conventional treatment for colorectal cancer: a multicenter, open-label randomized controlled study
title_fullStr Fast-track multidisciplinary treatment versus conventional treatment for colorectal cancer: a multicenter, open-label randomized controlled study
title_full_unstemmed Fast-track multidisciplinary treatment versus conventional treatment for colorectal cancer: a multicenter, open-label randomized controlled study
title_short Fast-track multidisciplinary treatment versus conventional treatment for colorectal cancer: a multicenter, open-label randomized controlled study
title_sort fast-track multidisciplinary treatment versus conventional treatment for colorectal cancer: a multicenter, open-label randomized controlled study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6806550/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31647032
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-6188-x
work_keys_str_mv AT lijun fasttrackmultidisciplinarytreatmentversusconventionaltreatmentforcolorectalcanceramulticenteropenlabelrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT kongxiangxing fasttrackmultidisciplinarytreatmentversusconventionaltreatmentforcolorectalcanceramulticenteropenlabelrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT zhoujiaojiao fasttrackmultidisciplinarytreatmentversusconventionaltreatmentforcolorectalcanceramulticenteropenlabelrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT songyongmao fasttrackmultidisciplinarytreatmentversusconventionaltreatmentforcolorectalcanceramulticenteropenlabelrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT huangxuefeng fasttrackmultidisciplinarytreatmentversusconventionaltreatmentforcolorectalcanceramulticenteropenlabelrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT ligenhai fasttrackmultidisciplinarytreatmentversusconventionaltreatmentforcolorectalcanceramulticenteropenlabelrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT yingxiaojiang fasttrackmultidisciplinarytreatmentversusconventionaltreatmentforcolorectalcanceramulticenteropenlabelrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT daixiaoyu fasttrackmultidisciplinarytreatmentversusconventionaltreatmentforcolorectalcanceramulticenteropenlabelrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT lumin fasttrackmultidisciplinarytreatmentversusconventionaltreatmentforcolorectalcanceramulticenteropenlabelrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT jiangkai fasttrackmultidisciplinarytreatmentversusconventionaltreatmentforcolorectalcanceramulticenteropenlabelrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT fudongliang fasttrackmultidisciplinarytreatmentversusconventionaltreatmentforcolorectalcanceramulticenteropenlabelrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT lixinlin fasttrackmultidisciplinarytreatmentversusconventionaltreatmentforcolorectalcanceramulticenteropenlabelrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT hejinjie fasttrackmultidisciplinarytreatmentversusconventionaltreatmentforcolorectalcanceramulticenteropenlabelrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT wangjianwei fasttrackmultidisciplinarytreatmentversusconventionaltreatmentforcolorectalcanceramulticenteropenlabelrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT sunlifeng fasttrackmultidisciplinarytreatmentversusconventionaltreatmentforcolorectalcanceramulticenteropenlabelrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT xudong fasttrackmultidisciplinarytreatmentversusconventionaltreatmentforcolorectalcanceramulticenteropenlabelrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT xujingyan fasttrackmultidisciplinarytreatmentversusconventionaltreatmentforcolorectalcanceramulticenteropenlabelrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT chenmin fasttrackmultidisciplinarytreatmentversusconventionaltreatmentforcolorectalcanceramulticenteropenlabelrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT tianyu fasttrackmultidisciplinarytreatmentversusconventionaltreatmentforcolorectalcanceramulticenteropenlabelrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT lijingsong fasttrackmultidisciplinarytreatmentversusconventionaltreatmentforcolorectalcanceramulticenteropenlabelrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT yanmin fasttrackmultidisciplinarytreatmentversusconventionaltreatmentforcolorectalcanceramulticenteropenlabelrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT yuanying fasttrackmultidisciplinarytreatmentversusconventionaltreatmentforcolorectalcanceramulticenteropenlabelrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT dingkefeng fasttrackmultidisciplinarytreatmentversusconventionaltreatmentforcolorectalcanceramulticenteropenlabelrandomizedcontrolledstudy