Cargando…

Comparison of xTAG Respiratory Virus Panel and Verigene Respiratory Virus Plus for Detecting Influenza Virus and Respiratory Syncytial Virus

BACKGROUND: Nucleic acid amplification tests have allowed simultaneous detection of multiple respiratory viruses. METHODS: We compared the results of a liquid bead array xTAG Respiratory Virus Panel (RVP; (Luminex Corporation, Toronto, Canada) and a solid microarray Verigene Respiratory Virus Plus (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hwang, Sang Mee, Lim, Mi Suk, Han, Minsuk, Hong, Yun Ji, Kim, Taek Soo, Lee, Hye Ryun, Song, Eun Young, Park, Kyoung Un, Song, Junghan, Kim, Eui Chong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6807105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24796703
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.21738
_version_ 1783461689023266816
author Hwang, Sang Mee
Lim, Mi Suk
Han, Minsuk
Hong, Yun Ji
Kim, Taek Soo
Lee, Hye Ryun
Song, Eun Young
Park, Kyoung Un
Song, Junghan
Kim, Eui Chong
author_facet Hwang, Sang Mee
Lim, Mi Suk
Han, Minsuk
Hong, Yun Ji
Kim, Taek Soo
Lee, Hye Ryun
Song, Eun Young
Park, Kyoung Un
Song, Junghan
Kim, Eui Chong
author_sort Hwang, Sang Mee
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Nucleic acid amplification tests have allowed simultaneous detection of multiple respiratory viruses. METHODS: We compared the results of a liquid bead array xTAG Respiratory Virus Panel (RVP; (Luminex Corporation, Toronto, Canada) and a solid microarray Verigene Respiratory Virus Plus (RV+; Nanosphere, Northbrook, IL) for the detection of influenza A virus (INF A), influenza B virus (INF B), and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in 170 respiratory specimens from hospitalized patients. RESULTS: Overall, xTAG RVP demonstrated sensitivities and specificities of 97.6 and 100% for INF A, 100 and 99.4% for INF B, and 100 and 100% for RSV, while the Verigene RV+ test sensitivities and specificities were 95.1 and 98.5%, 100.0 and 99.4%, and 97.1 and 100%, respectively. There were no significant differences in the area under the curves between the two assays for each virus (P = 0.364 for INF A, P = 1.000 for INF B, P = 0.317 for RSV). Comparing the results of two assays, discordant results were present mostly due to subtype assignments and identification of coinfections. The detection of viruses was not significantly different (P = 1.000) and the virus/subtype assignment showed good agreement with kappa coefficients of 0.908. CONCLUSION: The xTAG RVP and Verigene RV+ showed high sensitivities and specificities, and good overall agreement in detection and identification of INF and RSV. These assays can be used in clinical settings for a reliable detection of respiratory viruses found commonly in hospitalized patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6807105
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68071052019-11-12 Comparison of xTAG Respiratory Virus Panel and Verigene Respiratory Virus Plus for Detecting Influenza Virus and Respiratory Syncytial Virus Hwang, Sang Mee Lim, Mi Suk Han, Minsuk Hong, Yun Ji Kim, Taek Soo Lee, Hye Ryun Song, Eun Young Park, Kyoung Un Song, Junghan Kim, Eui Chong J Clin Lab Anal Original Articles BACKGROUND: Nucleic acid amplification tests have allowed simultaneous detection of multiple respiratory viruses. METHODS: We compared the results of a liquid bead array xTAG Respiratory Virus Panel (RVP; (Luminex Corporation, Toronto, Canada) and a solid microarray Verigene Respiratory Virus Plus (RV+; Nanosphere, Northbrook, IL) for the detection of influenza A virus (INF A), influenza B virus (INF B), and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in 170 respiratory specimens from hospitalized patients. RESULTS: Overall, xTAG RVP demonstrated sensitivities and specificities of 97.6 and 100% for INF A, 100 and 99.4% for INF B, and 100 and 100% for RSV, while the Verigene RV+ test sensitivities and specificities were 95.1 and 98.5%, 100.0 and 99.4%, and 97.1 and 100%, respectively. There were no significant differences in the area under the curves between the two assays for each virus (P = 0.364 for INF A, P = 1.000 for INF B, P = 0.317 for RSV). Comparing the results of two assays, discordant results were present mostly due to subtype assignments and identification of coinfections. The detection of viruses was not significantly different (P = 1.000) and the virus/subtype assignment showed good agreement with kappa coefficients of 0.908. CONCLUSION: The xTAG RVP and Verigene RV+ showed high sensitivities and specificities, and good overall agreement in detection and identification of INF and RSV. These assays can be used in clinical settings for a reliable detection of respiratory viruses found commonly in hospitalized patients. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2014-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6807105/ /pubmed/24796703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.21738 Text en © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Hwang, Sang Mee
Lim, Mi Suk
Han, Minsuk
Hong, Yun Ji
Kim, Taek Soo
Lee, Hye Ryun
Song, Eun Young
Park, Kyoung Un
Song, Junghan
Kim, Eui Chong
Comparison of xTAG Respiratory Virus Panel and Verigene Respiratory Virus Plus for Detecting Influenza Virus and Respiratory Syncytial Virus
title Comparison of xTAG Respiratory Virus Panel and Verigene Respiratory Virus Plus for Detecting Influenza Virus and Respiratory Syncytial Virus
title_full Comparison of xTAG Respiratory Virus Panel and Verigene Respiratory Virus Plus for Detecting Influenza Virus and Respiratory Syncytial Virus
title_fullStr Comparison of xTAG Respiratory Virus Panel and Verigene Respiratory Virus Plus for Detecting Influenza Virus and Respiratory Syncytial Virus
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of xTAG Respiratory Virus Panel and Verigene Respiratory Virus Plus for Detecting Influenza Virus and Respiratory Syncytial Virus
title_short Comparison of xTAG Respiratory Virus Panel and Verigene Respiratory Virus Plus for Detecting Influenza Virus and Respiratory Syncytial Virus
title_sort comparison of xtag respiratory virus panel and verigene respiratory virus plus for detecting influenza virus and respiratory syncytial virus
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6807105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24796703
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.21738
work_keys_str_mv AT hwangsangmee comparisonofxtagrespiratoryviruspanelandverigenerespiratoryvirusplusfordetectinginfluenzavirusandrespiratorysyncytialvirus
AT limmisuk comparisonofxtagrespiratoryviruspanelandverigenerespiratoryvirusplusfordetectinginfluenzavirusandrespiratorysyncytialvirus
AT hanminsuk comparisonofxtagrespiratoryviruspanelandverigenerespiratoryvirusplusfordetectinginfluenzavirusandrespiratorysyncytialvirus
AT hongyunji comparisonofxtagrespiratoryviruspanelandverigenerespiratoryvirusplusfordetectinginfluenzavirusandrespiratorysyncytialvirus
AT kimtaeksoo comparisonofxtagrespiratoryviruspanelandverigenerespiratoryvirusplusfordetectinginfluenzavirusandrespiratorysyncytialvirus
AT leehyeryun comparisonofxtagrespiratoryviruspanelandverigenerespiratoryvirusplusfordetectinginfluenzavirusandrespiratorysyncytialvirus
AT songeunyoung comparisonofxtagrespiratoryviruspanelandverigenerespiratoryvirusplusfordetectinginfluenzavirusandrespiratorysyncytialvirus
AT parkkyoungun comparisonofxtagrespiratoryviruspanelandverigenerespiratoryvirusplusfordetectinginfluenzavirusandrespiratorysyncytialvirus
AT songjunghan comparisonofxtagrespiratoryviruspanelandverigenerespiratoryvirusplusfordetectinginfluenzavirusandrespiratorysyncytialvirus
AT kimeuichong comparisonofxtagrespiratoryviruspanelandverigenerespiratoryvirusplusfordetectinginfluenzavirusandrespiratorysyncytialvirus