Cargando…

The Fracture Callus Is Formed by Progenitors of Different Skeletal Origins in a Site‐Specific Manner

We evaluated repair following a mid‐diaphyseal fracture of the tibia in 3‐month‐old mice. We observed differences in the repair process at three different sites of the callus. Site 1: bone developing from the outer layer of the periosteum of the cortex; site 2: bone developing within the bridge/cent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Yongmei, Chen, Ling, Kang, Misun, Ling, Lin, Tian, Faming, Won‐Kim, Sun Hee, Ho, Sunita, Bikle, Daniel D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6808225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31667451
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm4.10193
_version_ 1783461747744571392
author Wang, Yongmei
Chen, Ling
Kang, Misun
Ling, Lin
Tian, Faming
Won‐Kim, Sun Hee
Ho, Sunita
Bikle, Daniel D.
author_facet Wang, Yongmei
Chen, Ling
Kang, Misun
Ling, Lin
Tian, Faming
Won‐Kim, Sun Hee
Ho, Sunita
Bikle, Daniel D.
author_sort Wang, Yongmei
collection PubMed
description We evaluated repair following a mid‐diaphyseal fracture of the tibia in 3‐month‐old mice. We observed differences in the repair process at three different sites of the callus. Site 1: bone developing from the outer layer of the periosteum of the cortex; site 2: bone developing within the bridge/central region of the fracture; and site 3: bone developing within the marrow of the ends of broken bones. We characterized these sites by correlating datasets from X‐ray CT and histology. Correlated data demonstrated the involvement of different cells and different rates of mineralization. The origin of the progenitors and mechanism of progenitor differentiation involved at these sites was then evaluated using lineage tracing of cells expressing Prx1 and Col.2. The Prx1 progeny contributed to intramembranous bone formation (IBF) at site 1 and endochondral bone formation (EndoBF) at site 2 but not to intramedullary bone formation (IMBF) at site 3. IBF at site 1 was confirmed without a chondrocyte intermediate unlike EndoBF at site 2. Additionally, the presence of Col.2 progeny contributed to EndoBF in site 2 and IMBF in site 3 but not to IBF in site 1. However, the Col.2 progeny in IMBF in site 3 appeared to come from Col.2‐expressing osteocytes originating in the cortices of the ends of the fractured bone. In conclusion we have identified three sites of bone fracture repair that differ in their origin of cells and their mechanisms of bone formation. © 2019 The Authors JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6808225
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68082252019-10-30 The Fracture Callus Is Formed by Progenitors of Different Skeletal Origins in a Site‐Specific Manner Wang, Yongmei Chen, Ling Kang, Misun Ling, Lin Tian, Faming Won‐Kim, Sun Hee Ho, Sunita Bikle, Daniel D. JBMR Plus Original Articles We evaluated repair following a mid‐diaphyseal fracture of the tibia in 3‐month‐old mice. We observed differences in the repair process at three different sites of the callus. Site 1: bone developing from the outer layer of the periosteum of the cortex; site 2: bone developing within the bridge/central region of the fracture; and site 3: bone developing within the marrow of the ends of broken bones. We characterized these sites by correlating datasets from X‐ray CT and histology. Correlated data demonstrated the involvement of different cells and different rates of mineralization. The origin of the progenitors and mechanism of progenitor differentiation involved at these sites was then evaluated using lineage tracing of cells expressing Prx1 and Col.2. The Prx1 progeny contributed to intramembranous bone formation (IBF) at site 1 and endochondral bone formation (EndoBF) at site 2 but not to intramedullary bone formation (IMBF) at site 3. IBF at site 1 was confirmed without a chondrocyte intermediate unlike EndoBF at site 2. Additionally, the presence of Col.2 progeny contributed to EndoBF in site 2 and IMBF in site 3 but not to IBF in site 1. However, the Col.2 progeny in IMBF in site 3 appeared to come from Col.2‐expressing osteocytes originating in the cortices of the ends of the fractured bone. In conclusion we have identified three sites of bone fracture repair that differ in their origin of cells and their mechanisms of bone formation. © 2019 The Authors JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6808225/ /pubmed/31667451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm4.10193 Text en © 2019 The Authors JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Wang, Yongmei
Chen, Ling
Kang, Misun
Ling, Lin
Tian, Faming
Won‐Kim, Sun Hee
Ho, Sunita
Bikle, Daniel D.
The Fracture Callus Is Formed by Progenitors of Different Skeletal Origins in a Site‐Specific Manner
title The Fracture Callus Is Formed by Progenitors of Different Skeletal Origins in a Site‐Specific Manner
title_full The Fracture Callus Is Formed by Progenitors of Different Skeletal Origins in a Site‐Specific Manner
title_fullStr The Fracture Callus Is Formed by Progenitors of Different Skeletal Origins in a Site‐Specific Manner
title_full_unstemmed The Fracture Callus Is Formed by Progenitors of Different Skeletal Origins in a Site‐Specific Manner
title_short The Fracture Callus Is Formed by Progenitors of Different Skeletal Origins in a Site‐Specific Manner
title_sort fracture callus is formed by progenitors of different skeletal origins in a site‐specific manner
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6808225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31667451
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm4.10193
work_keys_str_mv AT wangyongmei thefracturecallusisformedbyprogenitorsofdifferentskeletaloriginsinasitespecificmanner
AT chenling thefracturecallusisformedbyprogenitorsofdifferentskeletaloriginsinasitespecificmanner
AT kangmisun thefracturecallusisformedbyprogenitorsofdifferentskeletaloriginsinasitespecificmanner
AT linglin thefracturecallusisformedbyprogenitorsofdifferentskeletaloriginsinasitespecificmanner
AT tianfaming thefracturecallusisformedbyprogenitorsofdifferentskeletaloriginsinasitespecificmanner
AT wonkimsunhee thefracturecallusisformedbyprogenitorsofdifferentskeletaloriginsinasitespecificmanner
AT hosunita thefracturecallusisformedbyprogenitorsofdifferentskeletaloriginsinasitespecificmanner
AT bikledanield thefracturecallusisformedbyprogenitorsofdifferentskeletaloriginsinasitespecificmanner
AT wangyongmei fracturecallusisformedbyprogenitorsofdifferentskeletaloriginsinasitespecificmanner
AT chenling fracturecallusisformedbyprogenitorsofdifferentskeletaloriginsinasitespecificmanner
AT kangmisun fracturecallusisformedbyprogenitorsofdifferentskeletaloriginsinasitespecificmanner
AT linglin fracturecallusisformedbyprogenitorsofdifferentskeletaloriginsinasitespecificmanner
AT tianfaming fracturecallusisformedbyprogenitorsofdifferentskeletaloriginsinasitespecificmanner
AT wonkimsunhee fracturecallusisformedbyprogenitorsofdifferentskeletaloriginsinasitespecificmanner
AT hosunita fracturecallusisformedbyprogenitorsofdifferentskeletaloriginsinasitespecificmanner
AT bikledanield fracturecallusisformedbyprogenitorsofdifferentskeletaloriginsinasitespecificmanner