Cargando…

Are dialects socially learned in marmoset monkeys? Evidence from translocation experiments

The acoustic properties of vocalizations in common marmosets differ between populations. These differences may be the result of social vocal learning, but they can also result from environmental or genetic differences between populations. We performed translocation experiments to separately quantify...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zürcher, Yvonne, Willems, Erik P., Burkart, Judith M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6808547/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31644527
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222486
_version_ 1783461772602114048
author Zürcher, Yvonne
Willems, Erik P.
Burkart, Judith M.
author_facet Zürcher, Yvonne
Willems, Erik P.
Burkart, Judith M.
author_sort Zürcher, Yvonne
collection PubMed
description The acoustic properties of vocalizations in common marmosets differ between populations. These differences may be the result of social vocal learning, but they can also result from environmental or genetic differences between populations. We performed translocation experiments to separately quantify the influence of a change in the physical environment (experiment 1), and a change in the social environment (experiment 2) on the acoustic properties of calls from individual captive common marmosets. If population differences were due to genetic differences, we expected no change in the vocalizations of the translocated marmosets. If differences were due to environmental factors, we expected vocalizations to permanently change contingent with environmental changes. If social learning was involved, we expected that the vocalizations of animals translocated to a new population with a different dialect would become more similar to the new population. In experiment 1, we translocated marmosets to a different physical environment without changing the social composition of the groups or their neighbours. Immediately after the translocation to the new facility, one out of three call types showed a significant change in call structure, but 5–6 weeks later, the calls were no longer different from before the translocation. Thus, the novel physical environment did not induce long lasting changes in the vocalizations of the marmosets. In experiment 2, we translocated marmosets to a new population with a different dialect. Importantly, our previous work had shown that these two populations differed significantly in vocalization structure. The translocated marmosets were still housed in their original social group, but after translocation they were surrounded by the vocalizations from neighbouring groups of the new population. The vocal distance between the translocated individuals and the new population decreased for two out of three call types over 16 weeks. Thus, even without direct social contact or interaction, the vocalizations of the translocated animals converged towards the new population, indicating that common marmosets can modify their calls due to acoustic input from conspecifics alone, via crowd vocal learning. To our knowledge, this is the first study able to distinguish between different explanations for vocal dialects as well as to show crowd vocal learning in a primate species.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6808547
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68085472019-11-02 Are dialects socially learned in marmoset monkeys? Evidence from translocation experiments Zürcher, Yvonne Willems, Erik P. Burkart, Judith M. PLoS One Research Article The acoustic properties of vocalizations in common marmosets differ between populations. These differences may be the result of social vocal learning, but they can also result from environmental or genetic differences between populations. We performed translocation experiments to separately quantify the influence of a change in the physical environment (experiment 1), and a change in the social environment (experiment 2) on the acoustic properties of calls from individual captive common marmosets. If population differences were due to genetic differences, we expected no change in the vocalizations of the translocated marmosets. If differences were due to environmental factors, we expected vocalizations to permanently change contingent with environmental changes. If social learning was involved, we expected that the vocalizations of animals translocated to a new population with a different dialect would become more similar to the new population. In experiment 1, we translocated marmosets to a different physical environment without changing the social composition of the groups or their neighbours. Immediately after the translocation to the new facility, one out of three call types showed a significant change in call structure, but 5–6 weeks later, the calls were no longer different from before the translocation. Thus, the novel physical environment did not induce long lasting changes in the vocalizations of the marmosets. In experiment 2, we translocated marmosets to a new population with a different dialect. Importantly, our previous work had shown that these two populations differed significantly in vocalization structure. The translocated marmosets were still housed in their original social group, but after translocation they were surrounded by the vocalizations from neighbouring groups of the new population. The vocal distance between the translocated individuals and the new population decreased for two out of three call types over 16 weeks. Thus, even without direct social contact or interaction, the vocalizations of the translocated animals converged towards the new population, indicating that common marmosets can modify their calls due to acoustic input from conspecifics alone, via crowd vocal learning. To our knowledge, this is the first study able to distinguish between different explanations for vocal dialects as well as to show crowd vocal learning in a primate species. Public Library of Science 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6808547/ /pubmed/31644527 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222486 Text en © 2019 Zürcher et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zürcher, Yvonne
Willems, Erik P.
Burkart, Judith M.
Are dialects socially learned in marmoset monkeys? Evidence from translocation experiments
title Are dialects socially learned in marmoset monkeys? Evidence from translocation experiments
title_full Are dialects socially learned in marmoset monkeys? Evidence from translocation experiments
title_fullStr Are dialects socially learned in marmoset monkeys? Evidence from translocation experiments
title_full_unstemmed Are dialects socially learned in marmoset monkeys? Evidence from translocation experiments
title_short Are dialects socially learned in marmoset monkeys? Evidence from translocation experiments
title_sort are dialects socially learned in marmoset monkeys? evidence from translocation experiments
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6808547/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31644527
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222486
work_keys_str_mv AT zurcheryvonne aredialectssociallylearnedinmarmosetmonkeysevidencefromtranslocationexperiments
AT willemserikp aredialectssociallylearnedinmarmosetmonkeysevidencefromtranslocationexperiments
AT burkartjudithm aredialectssociallylearnedinmarmosetmonkeysevidencefromtranslocationexperiments