Cargando…
Percutaneous nephrostomy versus antegrade double-J stent placement in the treatment of malignant obstructive uropathy: a cost-effectiveness analysis from the perspective of the Brazilian public health care system
OBJECTIVE: To compare two percutaneous techniques used in the treatment of malignant obstructive uropathy-antegrade double-J stent placement (JJ stenting) and percutaneous nephrostomy-in terms of their cost-effectiveness, from the perspective of the Brazilian public health care system. MATERIALS AND...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por
Imagem
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6808611/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31656347 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2018.0127 |
_version_ | 1783461777245208576 |
---|---|
author | Tibana, Tiago Kojun Grubert, Renata Motta Santos, Rômulo Florêncio Tristão Fornazari, Vinicius Adami Vayego Domingos, André Alonso Reis, William Tavares Marchiori, Edson Nunes, Thiago Franchi |
author_facet | Tibana, Tiago Kojun Grubert, Renata Motta Santos, Rômulo Florêncio Tristão Fornazari, Vinicius Adami Vayego Domingos, André Alonso Reis, William Tavares Marchiori, Edson Nunes, Thiago Franchi |
author_sort | Tibana, Tiago Kojun |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To compare two percutaneous techniques used in the treatment of malignant obstructive uropathy-antegrade double-J stent placement (JJ stenting) and percutaneous nephrostomy-in terms of their cost-effectiveness, from the perspective of the Brazilian public health care system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this cost-effectiveness analysis, we employed decision-analytic modeling. We calculated material costs from 2017 factory prices listed by the Brazilian Pharmaceutical Market Regulatory Board (for medications) and published in the journal Revista Simpro (for medical devices). Procedure-related costs were evaluated, as were the rates of technical and clinical success. Those measures were then used as inputs for a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing the two procedures. RESULTS: The sample comprised 41 patients, of whom 16 underwent antegrade JJ stenting (26 procedures) and 10 underwent percutaneous nephrostomy (15 procedures). Patient records, radiology reports, and expense reports of the interventional radiology department of the public hospital where the study was conducted were analyzed retrospectively. There were no significant complications: one patient had low back pain, and one had a transient retroperitoneal hematoma. The mean procedure time was 24 min, and clinical success (improvement in serum creatinine and resolution of hydronephrosis) was achieved in 97.5% of the cases. The average cost of JJ stenting was significantly lower than was that of percutaneous nephrostomy (US$164.10 vs. US$552.20). CONCLUSION: In the absence of any clinical contraindications, antegrade JJ stenting is a suitable alternative to both percutaneous nephrostomy and retrograde stenting in patients with dilated renal collecting systems secondary to malignant ureteral obstruction, providing significant cost savings and high success rates. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6808611 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por
Imagem |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68086112019-10-25 Percutaneous nephrostomy versus antegrade double-J stent placement in the treatment of malignant obstructive uropathy: a cost-effectiveness analysis from the perspective of the Brazilian public health care system Tibana, Tiago Kojun Grubert, Renata Motta Santos, Rômulo Florêncio Tristão Fornazari, Vinicius Adami Vayego Domingos, André Alonso Reis, William Tavares Marchiori, Edson Nunes, Thiago Franchi Radiol Bras Original Articles OBJECTIVE: To compare two percutaneous techniques used in the treatment of malignant obstructive uropathy-antegrade double-J stent placement (JJ stenting) and percutaneous nephrostomy-in terms of their cost-effectiveness, from the perspective of the Brazilian public health care system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this cost-effectiveness analysis, we employed decision-analytic modeling. We calculated material costs from 2017 factory prices listed by the Brazilian Pharmaceutical Market Regulatory Board (for medications) and published in the journal Revista Simpro (for medical devices). Procedure-related costs were evaluated, as were the rates of technical and clinical success. Those measures were then used as inputs for a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing the two procedures. RESULTS: The sample comprised 41 patients, of whom 16 underwent antegrade JJ stenting (26 procedures) and 10 underwent percutaneous nephrostomy (15 procedures). Patient records, radiology reports, and expense reports of the interventional radiology department of the public hospital where the study was conducted were analyzed retrospectively. There were no significant complications: one patient had low back pain, and one had a transient retroperitoneal hematoma. The mean procedure time was 24 min, and clinical success (improvement in serum creatinine and resolution of hydronephrosis) was achieved in 97.5% of the cases. The average cost of JJ stenting was significantly lower than was that of percutaneous nephrostomy (US$164.10 vs. US$552.20). CONCLUSION: In the absence of any clinical contraindications, antegrade JJ stenting is a suitable alternative to both percutaneous nephrostomy and retrograde stenting in patients with dilated renal collecting systems secondary to malignant ureteral obstruction, providing significant cost savings and high success rates. Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6808611/ /pubmed/31656347 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2018.0127 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Tibana, Tiago Kojun Grubert, Renata Motta Santos, Rômulo Florêncio Tristão Fornazari, Vinicius Adami Vayego Domingos, André Alonso Reis, William Tavares Marchiori, Edson Nunes, Thiago Franchi Percutaneous nephrostomy versus antegrade double-J stent placement in the treatment of malignant obstructive uropathy: a cost-effectiveness analysis from the perspective of the Brazilian public health care system |
title | Percutaneous nephrostomy versus antegrade double-J stent placement in
the treatment of malignant obstructive uropathy: a cost-effectiveness analysis
from the perspective of the Brazilian public health care system |
title_full | Percutaneous nephrostomy versus antegrade double-J stent placement in
the treatment of malignant obstructive uropathy: a cost-effectiveness analysis
from the perspective of the Brazilian public health care system |
title_fullStr | Percutaneous nephrostomy versus antegrade double-J stent placement in
the treatment of malignant obstructive uropathy: a cost-effectiveness analysis
from the perspective of the Brazilian public health care system |
title_full_unstemmed | Percutaneous nephrostomy versus antegrade double-J stent placement in
the treatment of malignant obstructive uropathy: a cost-effectiveness analysis
from the perspective of the Brazilian public health care system |
title_short | Percutaneous nephrostomy versus antegrade double-J stent placement in
the treatment of malignant obstructive uropathy: a cost-effectiveness analysis
from the perspective of the Brazilian public health care system |
title_sort | percutaneous nephrostomy versus antegrade double-j stent placement in
the treatment of malignant obstructive uropathy: a cost-effectiveness analysis
from the perspective of the brazilian public health care system |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6808611/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31656347 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2018.0127 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tibanatiagokojun percutaneousnephrostomyversusantegradedoublejstentplacementinthetreatmentofmalignantobstructiveuropathyacosteffectivenessanalysisfromtheperspectiveofthebrazilianpublichealthcaresystem AT grubertrenatamotta percutaneousnephrostomyversusantegradedoublejstentplacementinthetreatmentofmalignantobstructiveuropathyacosteffectivenessanalysisfromtheperspectiveofthebrazilianpublichealthcaresystem AT santosromuloflorenciotristao percutaneousnephrostomyversusantegradedoublejstentplacementinthetreatmentofmalignantobstructiveuropathyacosteffectivenessanalysisfromtheperspectiveofthebrazilianpublichealthcaresystem AT fornazariviniciusadamivayego percutaneousnephrostomyversusantegradedoublejstentplacementinthetreatmentofmalignantobstructiveuropathyacosteffectivenessanalysisfromtheperspectiveofthebrazilianpublichealthcaresystem AT domingosandrealonso percutaneousnephrostomyversusantegradedoublejstentplacementinthetreatmentofmalignantobstructiveuropathyacosteffectivenessanalysisfromtheperspectiveofthebrazilianpublichealthcaresystem AT reiswilliamtavares percutaneousnephrostomyversusantegradedoublejstentplacementinthetreatmentofmalignantobstructiveuropathyacosteffectivenessanalysisfromtheperspectiveofthebrazilianpublichealthcaresystem AT marchioriedson percutaneousnephrostomyversusantegradedoublejstentplacementinthetreatmentofmalignantobstructiveuropathyacosteffectivenessanalysisfromtheperspectiveofthebrazilianpublichealthcaresystem AT nunesthiagofranchi percutaneousnephrostomyversusantegradedoublejstentplacementinthetreatmentofmalignantobstructiveuropathyacosteffectivenessanalysisfromtheperspectiveofthebrazilianpublichealthcaresystem |