Cargando…

Percutaneous nephrostomy versus antegrade double-J stent placement in the treatment of malignant obstructive uropathy: a cost-effectiveness analysis from the perspective of the Brazilian public health care system

OBJECTIVE: To compare two percutaneous techniques used in the treatment of malignant obstructive uropathy-antegrade double-J stent placement (JJ stenting) and percutaneous nephrostomy-in terms of their cost-effectiveness, from the perspective of the Brazilian public health care system. MATERIALS AND...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tibana, Tiago Kojun, Grubert, Renata Motta, Santos, Rômulo Florêncio Tristão, Fornazari, Vinicius Adami Vayego, Domingos, André Alonso, Reis, William Tavares, Marchiori, Edson, Nunes, Thiago Franchi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6808611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31656347
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2018.0127
_version_ 1783461777245208576
author Tibana, Tiago Kojun
Grubert, Renata Motta
Santos, Rômulo Florêncio Tristão
Fornazari, Vinicius Adami Vayego
Domingos, André Alonso
Reis, William Tavares
Marchiori, Edson
Nunes, Thiago Franchi
author_facet Tibana, Tiago Kojun
Grubert, Renata Motta
Santos, Rômulo Florêncio Tristão
Fornazari, Vinicius Adami Vayego
Domingos, André Alonso
Reis, William Tavares
Marchiori, Edson
Nunes, Thiago Franchi
author_sort Tibana, Tiago Kojun
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare two percutaneous techniques used in the treatment of malignant obstructive uropathy-antegrade double-J stent placement (JJ stenting) and percutaneous nephrostomy-in terms of their cost-effectiveness, from the perspective of the Brazilian public health care system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this cost-effectiveness analysis, we employed decision-analytic modeling. We calculated material costs from 2017 factory prices listed by the Brazilian Pharmaceutical Market Regulatory Board (for medications) and published in the journal Revista Simpro (for medical devices). Procedure-related costs were evaluated, as were the rates of technical and clinical success. Those measures were then used as inputs for a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing the two procedures. RESULTS: The sample comprised 41 patients, of whom 16 underwent antegrade JJ stenting (26 procedures) and 10 underwent percutaneous nephrostomy (15 procedures). Patient records, radiology reports, and expense reports of the interventional radiology department of the public hospital where the study was conducted were analyzed retrospectively. There were no significant complications: one patient had low back pain, and one had a transient retroperitoneal hematoma. The mean procedure time was 24 min, and clinical success (improvement in serum creatinine and resolution of hydronephrosis) was achieved in 97.5% of the cases. The average cost of JJ stenting was significantly lower than was that of percutaneous nephrostomy (US$164.10 vs. US$552.20). CONCLUSION: In the absence of any clinical contraindications, antegrade JJ stenting is a suitable alternative to both percutaneous nephrostomy and retrograde stenting in patients with dilated renal collecting systems secondary to malignant ureteral obstruction, providing significant cost savings and high success rates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6808611
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68086112019-10-25 Percutaneous nephrostomy versus antegrade double-J stent placement in the treatment of malignant obstructive uropathy: a cost-effectiveness analysis from the perspective of the Brazilian public health care system Tibana, Tiago Kojun Grubert, Renata Motta Santos, Rômulo Florêncio Tristão Fornazari, Vinicius Adami Vayego Domingos, André Alonso Reis, William Tavares Marchiori, Edson Nunes, Thiago Franchi Radiol Bras Original Articles OBJECTIVE: To compare two percutaneous techniques used in the treatment of malignant obstructive uropathy-antegrade double-J stent placement (JJ stenting) and percutaneous nephrostomy-in terms of their cost-effectiveness, from the perspective of the Brazilian public health care system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this cost-effectiveness analysis, we employed decision-analytic modeling. We calculated material costs from 2017 factory prices listed by the Brazilian Pharmaceutical Market Regulatory Board (for medications) and published in the journal Revista Simpro (for medical devices). Procedure-related costs were evaluated, as were the rates of technical and clinical success. Those measures were then used as inputs for a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing the two procedures. RESULTS: The sample comprised 41 patients, of whom 16 underwent antegrade JJ stenting (26 procedures) and 10 underwent percutaneous nephrostomy (15 procedures). Patient records, radiology reports, and expense reports of the interventional radiology department of the public hospital where the study was conducted were analyzed retrospectively. There were no significant complications: one patient had low back pain, and one had a transient retroperitoneal hematoma. The mean procedure time was 24 min, and clinical success (improvement in serum creatinine and resolution of hydronephrosis) was achieved in 97.5% of the cases. The average cost of JJ stenting was significantly lower than was that of percutaneous nephrostomy (US$164.10 vs. US$552.20). CONCLUSION: In the absence of any clinical contraindications, antegrade JJ stenting is a suitable alternative to both percutaneous nephrostomy and retrograde stenting in patients with dilated renal collecting systems secondary to malignant ureteral obstruction, providing significant cost savings and high success rates. Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6808611/ /pubmed/31656347 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2018.0127 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Tibana, Tiago Kojun
Grubert, Renata Motta
Santos, Rômulo Florêncio Tristão
Fornazari, Vinicius Adami Vayego
Domingos, André Alonso
Reis, William Tavares
Marchiori, Edson
Nunes, Thiago Franchi
Percutaneous nephrostomy versus antegrade double-J stent placement in the treatment of malignant obstructive uropathy: a cost-effectiveness analysis from the perspective of the Brazilian public health care system
title Percutaneous nephrostomy versus antegrade double-J stent placement in the treatment of malignant obstructive uropathy: a cost-effectiveness analysis from the perspective of the Brazilian public health care system
title_full Percutaneous nephrostomy versus antegrade double-J stent placement in the treatment of malignant obstructive uropathy: a cost-effectiveness analysis from the perspective of the Brazilian public health care system
title_fullStr Percutaneous nephrostomy versus antegrade double-J stent placement in the treatment of malignant obstructive uropathy: a cost-effectiveness analysis from the perspective of the Brazilian public health care system
title_full_unstemmed Percutaneous nephrostomy versus antegrade double-J stent placement in the treatment of malignant obstructive uropathy: a cost-effectiveness analysis from the perspective of the Brazilian public health care system
title_short Percutaneous nephrostomy versus antegrade double-J stent placement in the treatment of malignant obstructive uropathy: a cost-effectiveness analysis from the perspective of the Brazilian public health care system
title_sort percutaneous nephrostomy versus antegrade double-j stent placement in the treatment of malignant obstructive uropathy: a cost-effectiveness analysis from the perspective of the brazilian public health care system
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6808611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31656347
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2018.0127
work_keys_str_mv AT tibanatiagokojun percutaneousnephrostomyversusantegradedoublejstentplacementinthetreatmentofmalignantobstructiveuropathyacosteffectivenessanalysisfromtheperspectiveofthebrazilianpublichealthcaresystem
AT grubertrenatamotta percutaneousnephrostomyversusantegradedoublejstentplacementinthetreatmentofmalignantobstructiveuropathyacosteffectivenessanalysisfromtheperspectiveofthebrazilianpublichealthcaresystem
AT santosromuloflorenciotristao percutaneousnephrostomyversusantegradedoublejstentplacementinthetreatmentofmalignantobstructiveuropathyacosteffectivenessanalysisfromtheperspectiveofthebrazilianpublichealthcaresystem
AT fornazariviniciusadamivayego percutaneousnephrostomyversusantegradedoublejstentplacementinthetreatmentofmalignantobstructiveuropathyacosteffectivenessanalysisfromtheperspectiveofthebrazilianpublichealthcaresystem
AT domingosandrealonso percutaneousnephrostomyversusantegradedoublejstentplacementinthetreatmentofmalignantobstructiveuropathyacosteffectivenessanalysisfromtheperspectiveofthebrazilianpublichealthcaresystem
AT reiswilliamtavares percutaneousnephrostomyversusantegradedoublejstentplacementinthetreatmentofmalignantobstructiveuropathyacosteffectivenessanalysisfromtheperspectiveofthebrazilianpublichealthcaresystem
AT marchioriedson percutaneousnephrostomyversusantegradedoublejstentplacementinthetreatmentofmalignantobstructiveuropathyacosteffectivenessanalysisfromtheperspectiveofthebrazilianpublichealthcaresystem
AT nunesthiagofranchi percutaneousnephrostomyversusantegradedoublejstentplacementinthetreatmentofmalignantobstructiveuropathyacosteffectivenessanalysisfromtheperspectiveofthebrazilianpublichealthcaresystem