Cargando…
1838. Bare Below the Elbows vs. Sleeved Attire: A Pilot Study Comparing Microbial Flora of Healthcare Workers
BACKGROUND: Bare Below the Elbows (BBE) is an approach to healthcare worker (HCW) attire that limits patient contact with contaminated HCW clothing. While supported by biological plausibility, the practice is controversial. Critics cite limited evidence that bare skin is less contaminated in compari...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6808678/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz359.100 |
_version_ | 1783461793500233728 |
---|---|
author | Assi, Mariam Major, Yvette Hess, Olivia Styslinger, Emily Srivastava, Tara Doern, Christopher Cooper, Kaila Godbout, Emily Stevens, Michael Bearman, Gonzalo Doll, Michelle |
author_facet | Assi, Mariam Major, Yvette Hess, Olivia Styslinger, Emily Srivastava, Tara Doern, Christopher Cooper, Kaila Godbout, Emily Stevens, Michael Bearman, Gonzalo Doll, Michelle |
author_sort | Assi, Mariam |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Bare Below the Elbows (BBE) is an approach to healthcare worker (HCW) attire that limits patient contact with contaminated HCW clothing. While supported by biological plausibility, the practice is controversial. Critics cite limited evidence that bare skin is less contaminated in comparison to sleeved garments such as white coats. This study is a comparison of the flora and bioburden between BBE and sleeved HCW. METHODS: HCW on 2 progressive care units were asked to allow swab sampling of their dominant wrist/forearm (Figure 1). Non-clinicians were excluded. Hand hygiene was not performed prior to sampling. HCW agreeing to participate completed informed consent, and a survey regarding bathing and laundering. Swabs were inoculated into TSA broths, and incubated for 24 hours at 37°C. Bioburden was estimated using McFarland standard optical densities by 2 independent blinded evaluators. The broth was streaked on blood agar and MacConkey plates. Colonies consistent with possible Staphylococcus spp. were tested with latex agglutination, and positive isolates were plated on CHROMagar™ MSSA/MRSA. Fisher’s exact/Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to compare the categorical/numerical data between BBE and sleeved providers using SAS version 9.4. RESULTS: Sixty-three HCW participated; 30 were BBE and 33 sleeved. A comparison of the 2 groups is shown in Table 1. The majority of bacterial growth was morphologically consistent with skin flora; no Gram-negative rods grew. The bioburden estimates and presence of Staphylococcus aureus were not different between the groups (P = 0.099 and 0.325, respectively). Surveys indicated that BBE providers were more likely to be working in freshly laundered garments (P < 0.0001); this was true for all BBE providers except 2 HCW on shift >24 hours. Three sleeved individuals could not remember when they last laundered the garment in which they were providing clinical care. CONCLUSION: HCW laundering practices remain suboptimal, particularly among sleeved HCW. The potential impact of hand hygiene on comparative bioburden between sleeved and BBE HCWs remains unknown and is the focus of future investigations. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported Disclosures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6808678 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68086782019-10-28 1838. Bare Below the Elbows vs. Sleeved Attire: A Pilot Study Comparing Microbial Flora of Healthcare Workers Assi, Mariam Major, Yvette Hess, Olivia Styslinger, Emily Srivastava, Tara Doern, Christopher Cooper, Kaila Godbout, Emily Stevens, Michael Bearman, Gonzalo Doll, Michelle Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Bare Below the Elbows (BBE) is an approach to healthcare worker (HCW) attire that limits patient contact with contaminated HCW clothing. While supported by biological plausibility, the practice is controversial. Critics cite limited evidence that bare skin is less contaminated in comparison to sleeved garments such as white coats. This study is a comparison of the flora and bioburden between BBE and sleeved HCW. METHODS: HCW on 2 progressive care units were asked to allow swab sampling of their dominant wrist/forearm (Figure 1). Non-clinicians were excluded. Hand hygiene was not performed prior to sampling. HCW agreeing to participate completed informed consent, and a survey regarding bathing and laundering. Swabs were inoculated into TSA broths, and incubated for 24 hours at 37°C. Bioburden was estimated using McFarland standard optical densities by 2 independent blinded evaluators. The broth was streaked on blood agar and MacConkey plates. Colonies consistent with possible Staphylococcus spp. were tested with latex agglutination, and positive isolates were plated on CHROMagar™ MSSA/MRSA. Fisher’s exact/Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to compare the categorical/numerical data between BBE and sleeved providers using SAS version 9.4. RESULTS: Sixty-three HCW participated; 30 were BBE and 33 sleeved. A comparison of the 2 groups is shown in Table 1. The majority of bacterial growth was morphologically consistent with skin flora; no Gram-negative rods grew. The bioburden estimates and presence of Staphylococcus aureus were not different between the groups (P = 0.099 and 0.325, respectively). Surveys indicated that BBE providers were more likely to be working in freshly laundered garments (P < 0.0001); this was true for all BBE providers except 2 HCW on shift >24 hours. Three sleeved individuals could not remember when they last laundered the garment in which they were providing clinical care. CONCLUSION: HCW laundering practices remain suboptimal, particularly among sleeved HCW. The potential impact of hand hygiene on comparative bioburden between sleeved and BBE HCWs remains unknown and is the focus of future investigations. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported Disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6808678/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz359.100 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Assi, Mariam Major, Yvette Hess, Olivia Styslinger, Emily Srivastava, Tara Doern, Christopher Cooper, Kaila Godbout, Emily Stevens, Michael Bearman, Gonzalo Doll, Michelle 1838. Bare Below the Elbows vs. Sleeved Attire: A Pilot Study Comparing Microbial Flora of Healthcare Workers |
title | 1838. Bare Below the Elbows vs. Sleeved Attire: A Pilot Study Comparing Microbial Flora of Healthcare Workers |
title_full | 1838. Bare Below the Elbows vs. Sleeved Attire: A Pilot Study Comparing Microbial Flora of Healthcare Workers |
title_fullStr | 1838. Bare Below the Elbows vs. Sleeved Attire: A Pilot Study Comparing Microbial Flora of Healthcare Workers |
title_full_unstemmed | 1838. Bare Below the Elbows vs. Sleeved Attire: A Pilot Study Comparing Microbial Flora of Healthcare Workers |
title_short | 1838. Bare Below the Elbows vs. Sleeved Attire: A Pilot Study Comparing Microbial Flora of Healthcare Workers |
title_sort | 1838. bare below the elbows vs. sleeved attire: a pilot study comparing microbial flora of healthcare workers |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6808678/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz359.100 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT assimariam 1838barebelowtheelbowsvssleevedattireapilotstudycomparingmicrobialfloraofhealthcareworkers AT majoryvette 1838barebelowtheelbowsvssleevedattireapilotstudycomparingmicrobialfloraofhealthcareworkers AT hessolivia 1838barebelowtheelbowsvssleevedattireapilotstudycomparingmicrobialfloraofhealthcareworkers AT styslingeremily 1838barebelowtheelbowsvssleevedattireapilotstudycomparingmicrobialfloraofhealthcareworkers AT srivastavatara 1838barebelowtheelbowsvssleevedattireapilotstudycomparingmicrobialfloraofhealthcareworkers AT doernchristopher 1838barebelowtheelbowsvssleevedattireapilotstudycomparingmicrobialfloraofhealthcareworkers AT cooperkaila 1838barebelowtheelbowsvssleevedattireapilotstudycomparingmicrobialfloraofhealthcareworkers AT godboutemily 1838barebelowtheelbowsvssleevedattireapilotstudycomparingmicrobialfloraofhealthcareworkers AT stevensmichael 1838barebelowtheelbowsvssleevedattireapilotstudycomparingmicrobialfloraofhealthcareworkers AT bearmangonzalo 1838barebelowtheelbowsvssleevedattireapilotstudycomparingmicrobialfloraofhealthcareworkers AT dollmichelle 1838barebelowtheelbowsvssleevedattireapilotstudycomparingmicrobialfloraofhealthcareworkers |