Cargando…
2040. Evaluation of Inpatient Antimicrobial Prescribing Practices in Cochabamba, Bolivia
BACKGROUND: Many developed nations have made antimicrobial stewardship a priority, creating benchmarks and national standards. Little has been published on the antimicrobial use and stewardship efforts in resource-limited countries due to difficulties collecting data. Viedma Hospital (VH) is a 200-b...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6808679/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1720 |
_version_ | 1783461793742454784 |
---|---|
author | Campion, Maureen G Castro, Rosario Saavedra Borda, Rocio Wessolossky, Mireya |
author_facet | Campion, Maureen G Castro, Rosario Saavedra Borda, Rocio Wessolossky, Mireya |
author_sort | Campion, Maureen G |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Many developed nations have made antimicrobial stewardship a priority, creating benchmarks and national standards. Little has been published on the antimicrobial use and stewardship efforts in resource-limited countries due to difficulties collecting data. Viedma Hospital (VH) is a 200-bed hospital in Cochabamba, Bolivia, with no formulized antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) program. To better understand the antibiotic (ABX) use at VH, a point prevalence study was conducted in partnership with UMass Medical School. Point prevalence studies comprehensively review patients prescribed antibiotics using standard criteria in the hospital at a specific point-in-time. Using prevalence studies, areas of opportunity can be identified to focus on limited AMS efforts. METHODS: This was an observational study completed through a 2-day chart review. Patients were included if they were greater than 16 y/o, admitted to the general medicine, surgical or intensive care floors at VH and receiving systemic ABXs at the time of review. Data were collected on location, clinical service, day of hospitalization, sex, age, fever, white blood cell count, immunocompromised status, ABXs prescribed including dose, duration and frequency, the indication for each ABX and microbiology results. RESULTS: 161 patients were admitted to the hospital during the point prevalence study, of which 85 (52.7%) were prescribed ABXs. Most ABXs were empiric (83%) and frequent indications included intra-abdominal infections (21.3%) and cellulitis (14.5%). Based upon evaluation utilizing standard criteria, 60% of ABXs were considered unnecessary, inappropriate or suboptimal. Common reasons for unnecessary ABXs was the excessive length of antimicrobial therapy (14%), inappropriate dosing of ABXs (8.5%) and no documented infection (51%). CONCLUSION: There is limited data discussing ABX utilization in Bolivia, despite continued use and growing resistance. The point prevalence review identified areas of inappropriate use. This evidence will be utilized to focus AMS efforts on the creation of empiric ABX selection, dose and duration recommendations for common indications. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6808679 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68086792019-10-28 2040. Evaluation of Inpatient Antimicrobial Prescribing Practices in Cochabamba, Bolivia Campion, Maureen G Castro, Rosario Saavedra Borda, Rocio Wessolossky, Mireya Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Many developed nations have made antimicrobial stewardship a priority, creating benchmarks and national standards. Little has been published on the antimicrobial use and stewardship efforts in resource-limited countries due to difficulties collecting data. Viedma Hospital (VH) is a 200-bed hospital in Cochabamba, Bolivia, with no formulized antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) program. To better understand the antibiotic (ABX) use at VH, a point prevalence study was conducted in partnership with UMass Medical School. Point prevalence studies comprehensively review patients prescribed antibiotics using standard criteria in the hospital at a specific point-in-time. Using prevalence studies, areas of opportunity can be identified to focus on limited AMS efforts. METHODS: This was an observational study completed through a 2-day chart review. Patients were included if they were greater than 16 y/o, admitted to the general medicine, surgical or intensive care floors at VH and receiving systemic ABXs at the time of review. Data were collected on location, clinical service, day of hospitalization, sex, age, fever, white blood cell count, immunocompromised status, ABXs prescribed including dose, duration and frequency, the indication for each ABX and microbiology results. RESULTS: 161 patients were admitted to the hospital during the point prevalence study, of which 85 (52.7%) were prescribed ABXs. Most ABXs were empiric (83%) and frequent indications included intra-abdominal infections (21.3%) and cellulitis (14.5%). Based upon evaluation utilizing standard criteria, 60% of ABXs were considered unnecessary, inappropriate or suboptimal. Common reasons for unnecessary ABXs was the excessive length of antimicrobial therapy (14%), inappropriate dosing of ABXs (8.5%) and no documented infection (51%). CONCLUSION: There is limited data discussing ABX utilization in Bolivia, despite continued use and growing resistance. The point prevalence review identified areas of inappropriate use. This evidence will be utilized to focus AMS efforts on the creation of empiric ABX selection, dose and duration recommendations for common indications. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6808679/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1720 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Campion, Maureen G Castro, Rosario Saavedra Borda, Rocio Wessolossky, Mireya 2040. Evaluation of Inpatient Antimicrobial Prescribing Practices in Cochabamba, Bolivia |
title | 2040. Evaluation of Inpatient Antimicrobial Prescribing Practices in Cochabamba, Bolivia |
title_full | 2040. Evaluation of Inpatient Antimicrobial Prescribing Practices in Cochabamba, Bolivia |
title_fullStr | 2040. Evaluation of Inpatient Antimicrobial Prescribing Practices in Cochabamba, Bolivia |
title_full_unstemmed | 2040. Evaluation of Inpatient Antimicrobial Prescribing Practices in Cochabamba, Bolivia |
title_short | 2040. Evaluation of Inpatient Antimicrobial Prescribing Practices in Cochabamba, Bolivia |
title_sort | 2040. evaluation of inpatient antimicrobial prescribing practices in cochabamba, bolivia |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6808679/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1720 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT campionmaureeng 2040evaluationofinpatientantimicrobialprescribingpracticesincochabambabolivia AT castrorosario 2040evaluationofinpatientantimicrobialprescribingpracticesincochabambabolivia AT saavedrabordarocio 2040evaluationofinpatientantimicrobialprescribingpracticesincochabambabolivia AT wessolosskymireya 2040evaluationofinpatientantimicrobialprescribingpracticesincochabambabolivia |