Cargando…

1296. Should HIV Disclosure at ED Based on Preliminary Results?

BACKGROUND: It is recommended that all adults presenting to Emergency Departments (ED) be offered opt out testing for HIV. There is evidence that detection of HIV infection, disclosure of infected status to the patient, and enrollment into HIV care are best accomplished during the ED visit. Any dela...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aguilera, Elizabeth A, Del Bianco, Gabriela P, Murphy, Daniel, Rodriguez, Gilhen, Heresi, Gloria, Murphy, James, Prater, Samuel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6808743/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1159
_version_ 1783461810040471552
author Aguilera, Elizabeth A
Del Bianco, Gabriela P
Murphy, Daniel
Rodriguez, Gilhen
Heresi, Gloria
Murphy, James
Prater, Samuel
author_facet Aguilera, Elizabeth A
Del Bianco, Gabriela P
Murphy, Daniel
Rodriguez, Gilhen
Heresi, Gloria
Murphy, James
Prater, Samuel
author_sort Aguilera, Elizabeth A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It is recommended that all adults presenting to Emergency Departments (ED) be offered opt out testing for HIV. There is evidence that detection of HIV infection, disclosure of infected status to the patient, and enrollment into HIV care are best accomplished during the ED visit. Any delay results in loss of patients. Among critical variables are capacities to conduct screening and confirmatory testing during the time the patient is a resident in the ED. We report on a facility where HIV screening is performed during ED patient dwell times but confirmatory results follow in ≥24h. The conundrum is whether patients found HIV positive by a screening test should be informed of the positive screening finding before confirmatory results are in hand. METHODS: Data obtained from a routine opt-out HIV screening program for the interval June 2017 to March 2019 conducted at the ED in Houston, Texas were evaluated. Patients between 18–65 years with Glasgow Score >9 were eligible for testing. HIV fourth-generation ADVIA Centaur™ Ag/Ab COMBO (Siemens) was used for screening. Positives screening tests were followed by Gennius™ HIV1/HIV2 confirmatory test. RESULTS: 12,040 HIV fourth-generation tests were performed; 232 (1.9%) were positive; the specificity of the screening testing was 98.2%. Twenty-two (9.5%) of screening test positive individuals were found HIV false positive (Ag/Ab positive and Gennius negative). The population had a mean age of 43.8 years (21–64), was predominately female (63.6%) and white (40.9%). Further testing was completed for 14 of the 22 patients with false-positive screening tests. 13 had negative tests for HIV RNA and 1 had a second HIV Ag/Ab test with negative findings. 8 (36.3%) screening test false-positive patients could not be located after their departure from the ED. CONCLUSION: If patients were disclosed of their HIV-positive status because of the screening test result, approximately 10% of these individuals would have been incorrectly categorized generating significant personal and social disruption while waiting for the confirmatory result. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6808743
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68087432019-10-28 1296. Should HIV Disclosure at ED Based on Preliminary Results? Aguilera, Elizabeth A Del Bianco, Gabriela P Murphy, Daniel Rodriguez, Gilhen Heresi, Gloria Murphy, James Prater, Samuel Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: It is recommended that all adults presenting to Emergency Departments (ED) be offered opt out testing for HIV. There is evidence that detection of HIV infection, disclosure of infected status to the patient, and enrollment into HIV care are best accomplished during the ED visit. Any delay results in loss of patients. Among critical variables are capacities to conduct screening and confirmatory testing during the time the patient is a resident in the ED. We report on a facility where HIV screening is performed during ED patient dwell times but confirmatory results follow in ≥24h. The conundrum is whether patients found HIV positive by a screening test should be informed of the positive screening finding before confirmatory results are in hand. METHODS: Data obtained from a routine opt-out HIV screening program for the interval June 2017 to March 2019 conducted at the ED in Houston, Texas were evaluated. Patients between 18–65 years with Glasgow Score >9 were eligible for testing. HIV fourth-generation ADVIA Centaur™ Ag/Ab COMBO (Siemens) was used for screening. Positives screening tests were followed by Gennius™ HIV1/HIV2 confirmatory test. RESULTS: 12,040 HIV fourth-generation tests were performed; 232 (1.9%) were positive; the specificity of the screening testing was 98.2%. Twenty-two (9.5%) of screening test positive individuals were found HIV false positive (Ag/Ab positive and Gennius negative). The population had a mean age of 43.8 years (21–64), was predominately female (63.6%) and white (40.9%). Further testing was completed for 14 of the 22 patients with false-positive screening tests. 13 had negative tests for HIV RNA and 1 had a second HIV Ag/Ab test with negative findings. 8 (36.3%) screening test false-positive patients could not be located after their departure from the ED. CONCLUSION: If patients were disclosed of their HIV-positive status because of the screening test result, approximately 10% of these individuals would have been incorrectly categorized generating significant personal and social disruption while waiting for the confirmatory result. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6808743/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1159 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Aguilera, Elizabeth A
Del Bianco, Gabriela P
Murphy, Daniel
Rodriguez, Gilhen
Heresi, Gloria
Murphy, James
Prater, Samuel
1296. Should HIV Disclosure at ED Based on Preliminary Results?
title 1296. Should HIV Disclosure at ED Based on Preliminary Results?
title_full 1296. Should HIV Disclosure at ED Based on Preliminary Results?
title_fullStr 1296. Should HIV Disclosure at ED Based on Preliminary Results?
title_full_unstemmed 1296. Should HIV Disclosure at ED Based on Preliminary Results?
title_short 1296. Should HIV Disclosure at ED Based on Preliminary Results?
title_sort 1296. should hiv disclosure at ed based on preliminary results?
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6808743/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1159
work_keys_str_mv AT aguileraelizabetha 1296shouldhivdisclosureatedbasedonpreliminaryresults
AT delbiancogabrielap 1296shouldhivdisclosureatedbasedonpreliminaryresults
AT murphydaniel 1296shouldhivdisclosureatedbasedonpreliminaryresults
AT rodriguezgilhen 1296shouldhivdisclosureatedbasedonpreliminaryresults
AT heresigloria 1296shouldhivdisclosureatedbasedonpreliminaryresults
AT murphyjames 1296shouldhivdisclosureatedbasedonpreliminaryresults
AT pratersamuel 1296shouldhivdisclosureatedbasedonpreliminaryresults