Cargando…

1597. Evaluation of Ceftaroline Resistance (CPT-R) in Chile Across Time and a Comparison of CLSI vs. EUCAST Breakpoints in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)

BACKGROUND: CPT-R in MRSA is associated with clonal complex (CC) 5 lineages. Chile, with wide dissemination of the CC5 Chilean-Cordobes clone, has high MRSA rates. In 2019, CLSI revised the breakpoints (BPs) keeping susceptible (S, minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC mg/L] ≤1), added susceptible d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khan, Ayesha, Rivas, Lina M, Spencer, Maria, Martínez, Jose R W, Lam, Marusella, Rojas, Pamela, Porte, Lorena, Silva, Francisco, Braun, Stephanie, Valdivieso, Francisco, Mϋlhauser, Margareta, Lafourcade, Mónica, Miller, William R, Garcia, Patricia, Arias, Cesar A, Munita, Jose M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6808775/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1461
_version_ 1783461818130235392
author Khan, Ayesha
Rivas, Lina M
Spencer, Maria
Martínez, Jose R W
Lam, Marusella
Rojas, Pamela
Porte, Lorena
Silva, Francisco
Braun, Stephanie
Valdivieso, Francisco
Mϋlhauser, Margareta
Lafourcade, Mónica
Miller, William R
Garcia, Patricia
Arias, Cesar A
Munita, Jose M
author_facet Khan, Ayesha
Rivas, Lina M
Spencer, Maria
Martínez, Jose R W
Lam, Marusella
Rojas, Pamela
Porte, Lorena
Silva, Francisco
Braun, Stephanie
Valdivieso, Francisco
Mϋlhauser, Margareta
Lafourcade, Mónica
Miller, William R
Garcia, Patricia
Arias, Cesar A
Munita, Jose M
author_sort Khan, Ayesha
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: CPT-R in MRSA is associated with clonal complex (CC) 5 lineages. Chile, with wide dissemination of the CC5 Chilean-Cordobes clone, has high MRSA rates. In 2019, CLSI revised the breakpoints (BPs) keeping susceptible (S, minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC mg/L] ≤1), added susceptible dose-dependent (SDD, MIC 2–4), removed intermediate (MIC 2); resistant (R) is now MIC ≥8. EUCAST S is MIC ≤ 1, but R differentiates among pneumonia (MIC > 1) and nonpneumonia (NP) isolates (MIC > 2). We evaluated CPT-R across time and agreement between agencies for broth microdilution (BMD), E-test and Disk Diffusion (DD) METHODS: Hospital- (HA; n = 320, 10 centers) and community-associated (CA, n = 37) clinical MRSA isolates collected between 1999 and 2018 were confirmed with MALDI-TOF, cefoxitin DD, and mecA PCR. CPT susceptibilities were evaluated by BMD, E-test and DD (5 and 30 mg) across revised and old CLSI or EUCAST BPs. We determined essential and categorical agreement (EA, CA), very major, major, and minor errors (VME, ME, MiE) RESULTS: The MIC(50)/MIC(90) of HA-MRSA with BMD was 2/2 mg/L (64% of isolates considered CPT non-susceptible) and 0.5/0.5 mg/L for CA-MRSA. MIC(50)/MIC(90) was 1/1.5 with E-test. Strains collected in 1999–2008 (n = 161) and 2009–2018 (n = 159) both had a MIC(50)/MIC(90) of 2/2. The EA of E-test with BMD was 82%; results of CA-VME-ME-MiE were 51-0-0-48% using the new CLSI BPs or 51-81-0-45% using EUCAST or old CLSI BPs. For BMD, CA-VME-ME-MiE between new CLSI and EUCAST was 95-0-0-5 with 100% CA for E-test. Under NP EUCAST BPs, R isolates increase from 5 to 21% by BMD and 0 to 8% by E-test. CA-VME-ME-MiE between new CLSI and NP EUCAST BPs for BMD is 79-0-0-21 and for E-test is 91-0-0-8. For DD vs. BMD, CA-VME-ME-MiE is 55-0-1-44 with new CLSI BPs, 53-63-1-43 with old CLSI and 36-6-35-51 with EUCAST. With EUCAST DD (5 μg CPT) as reference vs. CLSI DD (30ug CPT), CA-VME-ME-MiE is 25-70-0-38. CONCLUSION: CPT nonsusceptibility is frequent in the CC5 HA-MRSA clone circulating in Chile across time. All methods had poor performance against BMD, but revision of CLSI BPs decreased error rates. E-test under called the MIC. CLSI DD (under called nonsusceptibility) and EUCAST DD (overcalled resistance) are drastically discordant. Respiratory isolates evaluated under NP BPs increased rates of resistance. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6808775
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68087752019-10-28 1597. Evaluation of Ceftaroline Resistance (CPT-R) in Chile Across Time and a Comparison of CLSI vs. EUCAST Breakpoints in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Khan, Ayesha Rivas, Lina M Spencer, Maria Martínez, Jose R W Lam, Marusella Rojas, Pamela Porte, Lorena Silva, Francisco Braun, Stephanie Valdivieso, Francisco Mϋlhauser, Margareta Lafourcade, Mónica Miller, William R Garcia, Patricia Arias, Cesar A Munita, Jose M Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: CPT-R in MRSA is associated with clonal complex (CC) 5 lineages. Chile, with wide dissemination of the CC5 Chilean-Cordobes clone, has high MRSA rates. In 2019, CLSI revised the breakpoints (BPs) keeping susceptible (S, minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC mg/L] ≤1), added susceptible dose-dependent (SDD, MIC 2–4), removed intermediate (MIC 2); resistant (R) is now MIC ≥8. EUCAST S is MIC ≤ 1, but R differentiates among pneumonia (MIC > 1) and nonpneumonia (NP) isolates (MIC > 2). We evaluated CPT-R across time and agreement between agencies for broth microdilution (BMD), E-test and Disk Diffusion (DD) METHODS: Hospital- (HA; n = 320, 10 centers) and community-associated (CA, n = 37) clinical MRSA isolates collected between 1999 and 2018 were confirmed with MALDI-TOF, cefoxitin DD, and mecA PCR. CPT susceptibilities were evaluated by BMD, E-test and DD (5 and 30 mg) across revised and old CLSI or EUCAST BPs. We determined essential and categorical agreement (EA, CA), very major, major, and minor errors (VME, ME, MiE) RESULTS: The MIC(50)/MIC(90) of HA-MRSA with BMD was 2/2 mg/L (64% of isolates considered CPT non-susceptible) and 0.5/0.5 mg/L for CA-MRSA. MIC(50)/MIC(90) was 1/1.5 with E-test. Strains collected in 1999–2008 (n = 161) and 2009–2018 (n = 159) both had a MIC(50)/MIC(90) of 2/2. The EA of E-test with BMD was 82%; results of CA-VME-ME-MiE were 51-0-0-48% using the new CLSI BPs or 51-81-0-45% using EUCAST or old CLSI BPs. For BMD, CA-VME-ME-MiE between new CLSI and EUCAST was 95-0-0-5 with 100% CA for E-test. Under NP EUCAST BPs, R isolates increase from 5 to 21% by BMD and 0 to 8% by E-test. CA-VME-ME-MiE between new CLSI and NP EUCAST BPs for BMD is 79-0-0-21 and for E-test is 91-0-0-8. For DD vs. BMD, CA-VME-ME-MiE is 55-0-1-44 with new CLSI BPs, 53-63-1-43 with old CLSI and 36-6-35-51 with EUCAST. With EUCAST DD (5 μg CPT) as reference vs. CLSI DD (30ug CPT), CA-VME-ME-MiE is 25-70-0-38. CONCLUSION: CPT nonsusceptibility is frequent in the CC5 HA-MRSA clone circulating in Chile across time. All methods had poor performance against BMD, but revision of CLSI BPs decreased error rates. E-test under called the MIC. CLSI DD (under called nonsusceptibility) and EUCAST DD (overcalled resistance) are drastically discordant. Respiratory isolates evaluated under NP BPs increased rates of resistance. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6808775/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1461 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Khan, Ayesha
Rivas, Lina M
Spencer, Maria
Martínez, Jose R W
Lam, Marusella
Rojas, Pamela
Porte, Lorena
Silva, Francisco
Braun, Stephanie
Valdivieso, Francisco
Mϋlhauser, Margareta
Lafourcade, Mónica
Miller, William R
Garcia, Patricia
Arias, Cesar A
Munita, Jose M
1597. Evaluation of Ceftaroline Resistance (CPT-R) in Chile Across Time and a Comparison of CLSI vs. EUCAST Breakpoints in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)
title 1597. Evaluation of Ceftaroline Resistance (CPT-R) in Chile Across Time and a Comparison of CLSI vs. EUCAST Breakpoints in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)
title_full 1597. Evaluation of Ceftaroline Resistance (CPT-R) in Chile Across Time and a Comparison of CLSI vs. EUCAST Breakpoints in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)
title_fullStr 1597. Evaluation of Ceftaroline Resistance (CPT-R) in Chile Across Time and a Comparison of CLSI vs. EUCAST Breakpoints in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)
title_full_unstemmed 1597. Evaluation of Ceftaroline Resistance (CPT-R) in Chile Across Time and a Comparison of CLSI vs. EUCAST Breakpoints in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)
title_short 1597. Evaluation of Ceftaroline Resistance (CPT-R) in Chile Across Time and a Comparison of CLSI vs. EUCAST Breakpoints in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)
title_sort 1597. evaluation of ceftaroline resistance (cpt-r) in chile across time and a comparison of clsi vs. eucast breakpoints in methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (mrsa)
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6808775/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1461
work_keys_str_mv AT khanayesha 1597evaluationofceftarolineresistancecptrinchileacrosstimeandacomparisonofclsivseucastbreakpointsinmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusmrsa
AT rivaslinam 1597evaluationofceftarolineresistancecptrinchileacrosstimeandacomparisonofclsivseucastbreakpointsinmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusmrsa
AT spencermaria 1597evaluationofceftarolineresistancecptrinchileacrosstimeandacomparisonofclsivseucastbreakpointsinmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusmrsa
AT martinezjoserw 1597evaluationofceftarolineresistancecptrinchileacrosstimeandacomparisonofclsivseucastbreakpointsinmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusmrsa
AT lammarusella 1597evaluationofceftarolineresistancecptrinchileacrosstimeandacomparisonofclsivseucastbreakpointsinmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusmrsa
AT rojaspamela 1597evaluationofceftarolineresistancecptrinchileacrosstimeandacomparisonofclsivseucastbreakpointsinmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusmrsa
AT portelorena 1597evaluationofceftarolineresistancecptrinchileacrosstimeandacomparisonofclsivseucastbreakpointsinmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusmrsa
AT silvafrancisco 1597evaluationofceftarolineresistancecptrinchileacrosstimeandacomparisonofclsivseucastbreakpointsinmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusmrsa
AT braunstephanie 1597evaluationofceftarolineresistancecptrinchileacrosstimeandacomparisonofclsivseucastbreakpointsinmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusmrsa
AT valdiviesofrancisco 1597evaluationofceftarolineresistancecptrinchileacrosstimeandacomparisonofclsivseucastbreakpointsinmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusmrsa
AT mÿlhausermargareta 1597evaluationofceftarolineresistancecptrinchileacrosstimeandacomparisonofclsivseucastbreakpointsinmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusmrsa
AT lafourcademonica 1597evaluationofceftarolineresistancecptrinchileacrosstimeandacomparisonofclsivseucastbreakpointsinmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusmrsa
AT millerwilliamr 1597evaluationofceftarolineresistancecptrinchileacrosstimeandacomparisonofclsivseucastbreakpointsinmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusmrsa
AT garciapatricia 1597evaluationofceftarolineresistancecptrinchileacrosstimeandacomparisonofclsivseucastbreakpointsinmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusmrsa
AT ariascesara 1597evaluationofceftarolineresistancecptrinchileacrosstimeandacomparisonofclsivseucastbreakpointsinmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusmrsa
AT munitajosem 1597evaluationofceftarolineresistancecptrinchileacrosstimeandacomparisonofclsivseucastbreakpointsinmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusmrsa