Cargando…
1597. Evaluation of Ceftaroline Resistance (CPT-R) in Chile Across Time and a Comparison of CLSI vs. EUCAST Breakpoints in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)
BACKGROUND: CPT-R in MRSA is associated with clonal complex (CC) 5 lineages. Chile, with wide dissemination of the CC5 Chilean-Cordobes clone, has high MRSA rates. In 2019, CLSI revised the breakpoints (BPs) keeping susceptible (S, minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC mg/L] ≤1), added susceptible d...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6808775/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1461 |
_version_ | 1783461818130235392 |
---|---|
author | Khan, Ayesha Rivas, Lina M Spencer, Maria Martínez, Jose R W Lam, Marusella Rojas, Pamela Porte, Lorena Silva, Francisco Braun, Stephanie Valdivieso, Francisco Mϋlhauser, Margareta Lafourcade, Mónica Miller, William R Garcia, Patricia Arias, Cesar A Munita, Jose M |
author_facet | Khan, Ayesha Rivas, Lina M Spencer, Maria Martínez, Jose R W Lam, Marusella Rojas, Pamela Porte, Lorena Silva, Francisco Braun, Stephanie Valdivieso, Francisco Mϋlhauser, Margareta Lafourcade, Mónica Miller, William R Garcia, Patricia Arias, Cesar A Munita, Jose M |
author_sort | Khan, Ayesha |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: CPT-R in MRSA is associated with clonal complex (CC) 5 lineages. Chile, with wide dissemination of the CC5 Chilean-Cordobes clone, has high MRSA rates. In 2019, CLSI revised the breakpoints (BPs) keeping susceptible (S, minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC mg/L] ≤1), added susceptible dose-dependent (SDD, MIC 2–4), removed intermediate (MIC 2); resistant (R) is now MIC ≥8. EUCAST S is MIC ≤ 1, but R differentiates among pneumonia (MIC > 1) and nonpneumonia (NP) isolates (MIC > 2). We evaluated CPT-R across time and agreement between agencies for broth microdilution (BMD), E-test and Disk Diffusion (DD) METHODS: Hospital- (HA; n = 320, 10 centers) and community-associated (CA, n = 37) clinical MRSA isolates collected between 1999 and 2018 were confirmed with MALDI-TOF, cefoxitin DD, and mecA PCR. CPT susceptibilities were evaluated by BMD, E-test and DD (5 and 30 mg) across revised and old CLSI or EUCAST BPs. We determined essential and categorical agreement (EA, CA), very major, major, and minor errors (VME, ME, MiE) RESULTS: The MIC(50)/MIC(90) of HA-MRSA with BMD was 2/2 mg/L (64% of isolates considered CPT non-susceptible) and 0.5/0.5 mg/L for CA-MRSA. MIC(50)/MIC(90) was 1/1.5 with E-test. Strains collected in 1999–2008 (n = 161) and 2009–2018 (n = 159) both had a MIC(50)/MIC(90) of 2/2. The EA of E-test with BMD was 82%; results of CA-VME-ME-MiE were 51-0-0-48% using the new CLSI BPs or 51-81-0-45% using EUCAST or old CLSI BPs. For BMD, CA-VME-ME-MiE between new CLSI and EUCAST was 95-0-0-5 with 100% CA for E-test. Under NP EUCAST BPs, R isolates increase from 5 to 21% by BMD and 0 to 8% by E-test. CA-VME-ME-MiE between new CLSI and NP EUCAST BPs for BMD is 79-0-0-21 and for E-test is 91-0-0-8. For DD vs. BMD, CA-VME-ME-MiE is 55-0-1-44 with new CLSI BPs, 53-63-1-43 with old CLSI and 36-6-35-51 with EUCAST. With EUCAST DD (5 μg CPT) as reference vs. CLSI DD (30ug CPT), CA-VME-ME-MiE is 25-70-0-38. CONCLUSION: CPT nonsusceptibility is frequent in the CC5 HA-MRSA clone circulating in Chile across time. All methods had poor performance against BMD, but revision of CLSI BPs decreased error rates. E-test under called the MIC. CLSI DD (under called nonsusceptibility) and EUCAST DD (overcalled resistance) are drastically discordant. Respiratory isolates evaluated under NP BPs increased rates of resistance. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6808775 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68087752019-10-28 1597. Evaluation of Ceftaroline Resistance (CPT-R) in Chile Across Time and a Comparison of CLSI vs. EUCAST Breakpoints in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Khan, Ayesha Rivas, Lina M Spencer, Maria Martínez, Jose R W Lam, Marusella Rojas, Pamela Porte, Lorena Silva, Francisco Braun, Stephanie Valdivieso, Francisco Mϋlhauser, Margareta Lafourcade, Mónica Miller, William R Garcia, Patricia Arias, Cesar A Munita, Jose M Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: CPT-R in MRSA is associated with clonal complex (CC) 5 lineages. Chile, with wide dissemination of the CC5 Chilean-Cordobes clone, has high MRSA rates. In 2019, CLSI revised the breakpoints (BPs) keeping susceptible (S, minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC mg/L] ≤1), added susceptible dose-dependent (SDD, MIC 2–4), removed intermediate (MIC 2); resistant (R) is now MIC ≥8. EUCAST S is MIC ≤ 1, but R differentiates among pneumonia (MIC > 1) and nonpneumonia (NP) isolates (MIC > 2). We evaluated CPT-R across time and agreement between agencies for broth microdilution (BMD), E-test and Disk Diffusion (DD) METHODS: Hospital- (HA; n = 320, 10 centers) and community-associated (CA, n = 37) clinical MRSA isolates collected between 1999 and 2018 were confirmed with MALDI-TOF, cefoxitin DD, and mecA PCR. CPT susceptibilities were evaluated by BMD, E-test and DD (5 and 30 mg) across revised and old CLSI or EUCAST BPs. We determined essential and categorical agreement (EA, CA), very major, major, and minor errors (VME, ME, MiE) RESULTS: The MIC(50)/MIC(90) of HA-MRSA with BMD was 2/2 mg/L (64% of isolates considered CPT non-susceptible) and 0.5/0.5 mg/L for CA-MRSA. MIC(50)/MIC(90) was 1/1.5 with E-test. Strains collected in 1999–2008 (n = 161) and 2009–2018 (n = 159) both had a MIC(50)/MIC(90) of 2/2. The EA of E-test with BMD was 82%; results of CA-VME-ME-MiE were 51-0-0-48% using the new CLSI BPs or 51-81-0-45% using EUCAST or old CLSI BPs. For BMD, CA-VME-ME-MiE between new CLSI and EUCAST was 95-0-0-5 with 100% CA for E-test. Under NP EUCAST BPs, R isolates increase from 5 to 21% by BMD and 0 to 8% by E-test. CA-VME-ME-MiE between new CLSI and NP EUCAST BPs for BMD is 79-0-0-21 and for E-test is 91-0-0-8. For DD vs. BMD, CA-VME-ME-MiE is 55-0-1-44 with new CLSI BPs, 53-63-1-43 with old CLSI and 36-6-35-51 with EUCAST. With EUCAST DD (5 μg CPT) as reference vs. CLSI DD (30ug CPT), CA-VME-ME-MiE is 25-70-0-38. CONCLUSION: CPT nonsusceptibility is frequent in the CC5 HA-MRSA clone circulating in Chile across time. All methods had poor performance against BMD, but revision of CLSI BPs decreased error rates. E-test under called the MIC. CLSI DD (under called nonsusceptibility) and EUCAST DD (overcalled resistance) are drastically discordant. Respiratory isolates evaluated under NP BPs increased rates of resistance. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6808775/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1461 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Khan, Ayesha Rivas, Lina M Spencer, Maria Martínez, Jose R W Lam, Marusella Rojas, Pamela Porte, Lorena Silva, Francisco Braun, Stephanie Valdivieso, Francisco Mϋlhauser, Margareta Lafourcade, Mónica Miller, William R Garcia, Patricia Arias, Cesar A Munita, Jose M 1597. Evaluation of Ceftaroline Resistance (CPT-R) in Chile Across Time and a Comparison of CLSI vs. EUCAST Breakpoints in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) |
title | 1597. Evaluation of Ceftaroline Resistance (CPT-R) in Chile Across Time and a Comparison of CLSI vs. EUCAST Breakpoints in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) |
title_full | 1597. Evaluation of Ceftaroline Resistance (CPT-R) in Chile Across Time and a Comparison of CLSI vs. EUCAST Breakpoints in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) |
title_fullStr | 1597. Evaluation of Ceftaroline Resistance (CPT-R) in Chile Across Time and a Comparison of CLSI vs. EUCAST Breakpoints in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) |
title_full_unstemmed | 1597. Evaluation of Ceftaroline Resistance (CPT-R) in Chile Across Time and a Comparison of CLSI vs. EUCAST Breakpoints in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) |
title_short | 1597. Evaluation of Ceftaroline Resistance (CPT-R) in Chile Across Time and a Comparison of CLSI vs. EUCAST Breakpoints in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) |
title_sort | 1597. evaluation of ceftaroline resistance (cpt-r) in chile across time and a comparison of clsi vs. eucast breakpoints in methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (mrsa) |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6808775/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1461 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT khanayesha 1597evaluationofceftarolineresistancecptrinchileacrosstimeandacomparisonofclsivseucastbreakpointsinmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusmrsa AT rivaslinam 1597evaluationofceftarolineresistancecptrinchileacrosstimeandacomparisonofclsivseucastbreakpointsinmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusmrsa AT spencermaria 1597evaluationofceftarolineresistancecptrinchileacrosstimeandacomparisonofclsivseucastbreakpointsinmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusmrsa AT martinezjoserw 1597evaluationofceftarolineresistancecptrinchileacrosstimeandacomparisonofclsivseucastbreakpointsinmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusmrsa AT lammarusella 1597evaluationofceftarolineresistancecptrinchileacrosstimeandacomparisonofclsivseucastbreakpointsinmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusmrsa AT rojaspamela 1597evaluationofceftarolineresistancecptrinchileacrosstimeandacomparisonofclsivseucastbreakpointsinmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusmrsa AT portelorena 1597evaluationofceftarolineresistancecptrinchileacrosstimeandacomparisonofclsivseucastbreakpointsinmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusmrsa AT silvafrancisco 1597evaluationofceftarolineresistancecptrinchileacrosstimeandacomparisonofclsivseucastbreakpointsinmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusmrsa AT braunstephanie 1597evaluationofceftarolineresistancecptrinchileacrosstimeandacomparisonofclsivseucastbreakpointsinmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusmrsa AT valdiviesofrancisco 1597evaluationofceftarolineresistancecptrinchileacrosstimeandacomparisonofclsivseucastbreakpointsinmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusmrsa AT mÿlhausermargareta 1597evaluationofceftarolineresistancecptrinchileacrosstimeandacomparisonofclsivseucastbreakpointsinmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusmrsa AT lafourcademonica 1597evaluationofceftarolineresistancecptrinchileacrosstimeandacomparisonofclsivseucastbreakpointsinmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusmrsa AT millerwilliamr 1597evaluationofceftarolineresistancecptrinchileacrosstimeandacomparisonofclsivseucastbreakpointsinmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusmrsa AT garciapatricia 1597evaluationofceftarolineresistancecptrinchileacrosstimeandacomparisonofclsivseucastbreakpointsinmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusmrsa AT ariascesara 1597evaluationofceftarolineresistancecptrinchileacrosstimeandacomparisonofclsivseucastbreakpointsinmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusmrsa AT munitajosem 1597evaluationofceftarolineresistancecptrinchileacrosstimeandacomparisonofclsivseucastbreakpointsinmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusmrsa |