Cargando…
1287. PrEP-Engaged or PrEP Curious?: A Characterization and Comparison of Initial PrEP Appointment Attenders vs. Nonattenders
BACKGROUND: Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), with adequate adherence, is highly effective prevention of HIV-1 infection amongst high-risk individuals. While over 1 million individuals are PrEP-eligible in the U.S., those at highest risk for HIV, specifically young...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6808843/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1150 |
_version_ | 1783461835392942080 |
---|---|
author | Kahal, Deborah A Goldstein, Neal Szabo, Susan |
author_facet | Kahal, Deborah A Goldstein, Neal Szabo, Susan |
author_sort | Kahal, Deborah A |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), with adequate adherence, is highly effective prevention of HIV-1 infection amongst high-risk individuals. While over 1 million individuals are PrEP-eligible in the U.S., those at highest risk for HIV, specifically young non-white men who have sex with men (MSM), represent some of the least penetrated groups to benefit from PrEP. No published data exists to characterize individuals with unattended initial PrEP appointments. METHODS: Our program, a Ryan White funded HIV clinic that also provides Hepatitis C and PrEP care, prospectively collected demographic data on all patients with an attended initial PrEP appointment between November 2015 and March 2019. We retrospectively abstracted the same data for individuals with unattended initial PrEP appointments (including cancelations and no shows) during the same period. Descriptive statistical analyses used rank-sum tests for skewed data (age) and Chi-squared tests for categorical data (all other variables). RESULTS: 33% (34/103) of all individuals did not attend an initial appointment (table). Younger age and nonprivate insurance were the 2 sociodemographic variables that were significantly associated with unattended vs. attended initial appointments. Amongst those whose HIV risk factors were known, MSM were more likely to attend their appointment compared with non-MSM. 77% (26/34) of individuals with unattended initial appointments did not reschedule (figure). Notably, 12% (4/34) PrEP-eligible individuals previously presented to the clinic yet did not re-present for dedicated PrEP evaluation. CONCLUSION: A significant proportion of individuals schedule but do not attend initial PrEP appointments. This cohort, particularly younger patients and those with nonprivate insurance, represents a distinct population - with a “near” yet incomplete engagement in care – for whom HIV prevention efforts and concerted outreach should be focused. Same day, rapid PrEP starts deserve serious consideration in order to capitalize on patient engagement when the opportunity presents. The paucity of data highlights the need for research of those who are PrEP-interested but not fully PrEP-engaged. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6808843 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68088432019-10-28 1287. PrEP-Engaged or PrEP Curious?: A Characterization and Comparison of Initial PrEP Appointment Attenders vs. Nonattenders Kahal, Deborah A Goldstein, Neal Szabo, Susan Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), with adequate adherence, is highly effective prevention of HIV-1 infection amongst high-risk individuals. While over 1 million individuals are PrEP-eligible in the U.S., those at highest risk for HIV, specifically young non-white men who have sex with men (MSM), represent some of the least penetrated groups to benefit from PrEP. No published data exists to characterize individuals with unattended initial PrEP appointments. METHODS: Our program, a Ryan White funded HIV clinic that also provides Hepatitis C and PrEP care, prospectively collected demographic data on all patients with an attended initial PrEP appointment between November 2015 and March 2019. We retrospectively abstracted the same data for individuals with unattended initial PrEP appointments (including cancelations and no shows) during the same period. Descriptive statistical analyses used rank-sum tests for skewed data (age) and Chi-squared tests for categorical data (all other variables). RESULTS: 33% (34/103) of all individuals did not attend an initial appointment (table). Younger age and nonprivate insurance were the 2 sociodemographic variables that were significantly associated with unattended vs. attended initial appointments. Amongst those whose HIV risk factors were known, MSM were more likely to attend their appointment compared with non-MSM. 77% (26/34) of individuals with unattended initial appointments did not reschedule (figure). Notably, 12% (4/34) PrEP-eligible individuals previously presented to the clinic yet did not re-present for dedicated PrEP evaluation. CONCLUSION: A significant proportion of individuals schedule but do not attend initial PrEP appointments. This cohort, particularly younger patients and those with nonprivate insurance, represents a distinct population - with a “near” yet incomplete engagement in care – for whom HIV prevention efforts and concerted outreach should be focused. Same day, rapid PrEP starts deserve serious consideration in order to capitalize on patient engagement when the opportunity presents. The paucity of data highlights the need for research of those who are PrEP-interested but not fully PrEP-engaged. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6808843/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1150 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Kahal, Deborah A Goldstein, Neal Szabo, Susan 1287. PrEP-Engaged or PrEP Curious?: A Characterization and Comparison of Initial PrEP Appointment Attenders vs. Nonattenders |
title | 1287. PrEP-Engaged or PrEP Curious?: A Characterization and Comparison of Initial PrEP Appointment Attenders vs. Nonattenders |
title_full | 1287. PrEP-Engaged or PrEP Curious?: A Characterization and Comparison of Initial PrEP Appointment Attenders vs. Nonattenders |
title_fullStr | 1287. PrEP-Engaged or PrEP Curious?: A Characterization and Comparison of Initial PrEP Appointment Attenders vs. Nonattenders |
title_full_unstemmed | 1287. PrEP-Engaged or PrEP Curious?: A Characterization and Comparison of Initial PrEP Appointment Attenders vs. Nonattenders |
title_short | 1287. PrEP-Engaged or PrEP Curious?: A Characterization and Comparison of Initial PrEP Appointment Attenders vs. Nonattenders |
title_sort | 1287. prep-engaged or prep curious?: a characterization and comparison of initial prep appointment attenders vs. nonattenders |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6808843/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1150 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kahaldeboraha 1287prepengagedorprepcuriousacharacterizationandcomparisonofinitialprepappointmentattendersvsnonattenders AT goldsteinneal 1287prepengagedorprepcuriousacharacterizationandcomparisonofinitialprepappointmentattendersvsnonattenders AT szabosusan 1287prepengagedorprepcuriousacharacterizationandcomparisonofinitialprepappointmentattendersvsnonattenders |