Cargando…

1287. PrEP-Engaged or PrEP Curious?: A Characterization and Comparison of Initial PrEP Appointment Attenders vs. Nonattenders

BACKGROUND: Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), with adequate adherence, is highly effective prevention of HIV-1 infection amongst high-risk individuals. While over 1 million individuals are PrEP-eligible in the U.S., those at highest risk for HIV, specifically young...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kahal, Deborah A, Goldstein, Neal, Szabo, Susan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6808843/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1150
_version_ 1783461835392942080
author Kahal, Deborah A
Goldstein, Neal
Szabo, Susan
author_facet Kahal, Deborah A
Goldstein, Neal
Szabo, Susan
author_sort Kahal, Deborah A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), with adequate adherence, is highly effective prevention of HIV-1 infection amongst high-risk individuals. While over 1 million individuals are PrEP-eligible in the U.S., those at highest risk for HIV, specifically young non-white men who have sex with men (MSM), represent some of the least penetrated groups to benefit from PrEP. No published data exists to characterize individuals with unattended initial PrEP appointments. METHODS: Our program, a Ryan White funded HIV clinic that also provides Hepatitis C and PrEP care, prospectively collected demographic data on all patients with an attended initial PrEP appointment between November 2015 and March 2019. We retrospectively abstracted the same data for individuals with unattended initial PrEP appointments (including cancelations and no shows) during the same period. Descriptive statistical analyses used rank-sum tests for skewed data (age) and Chi-squared tests for categorical data (all other variables). RESULTS: 33% (34/103) of all individuals did not attend an initial appointment (table). Younger age and nonprivate insurance were the 2 sociodemographic variables that were significantly associated with unattended vs. attended initial appointments. Amongst those whose HIV risk factors were known, MSM were more likely to attend their appointment compared with non-MSM. 77% (26/34) of individuals with unattended initial appointments did not reschedule (figure). Notably, 12% (4/34) PrEP-eligible individuals previously presented to the clinic yet did not re-present for dedicated PrEP evaluation. CONCLUSION: A significant proportion of individuals schedule but do not attend initial PrEP appointments. This cohort, particularly younger patients and those with nonprivate insurance, represents a distinct population - with a “near” yet incomplete engagement in care – for whom HIV prevention efforts and concerted outreach should be focused. Same day, rapid PrEP starts deserve serious consideration in order to capitalize on patient engagement when the opportunity presents. The paucity of data highlights the need for research of those who are PrEP-interested but not fully PrEP-engaged. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6808843
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68088432019-10-28 1287. PrEP-Engaged or PrEP Curious?: A Characterization and Comparison of Initial PrEP Appointment Attenders vs. Nonattenders Kahal, Deborah A Goldstein, Neal Szabo, Susan Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), with adequate adherence, is highly effective prevention of HIV-1 infection amongst high-risk individuals. While over 1 million individuals are PrEP-eligible in the U.S., those at highest risk for HIV, specifically young non-white men who have sex with men (MSM), represent some of the least penetrated groups to benefit from PrEP. No published data exists to characterize individuals with unattended initial PrEP appointments. METHODS: Our program, a Ryan White funded HIV clinic that also provides Hepatitis C and PrEP care, prospectively collected demographic data on all patients with an attended initial PrEP appointment between November 2015 and March 2019. We retrospectively abstracted the same data for individuals with unattended initial PrEP appointments (including cancelations and no shows) during the same period. Descriptive statistical analyses used rank-sum tests for skewed data (age) and Chi-squared tests for categorical data (all other variables). RESULTS: 33% (34/103) of all individuals did not attend an initial appointment (table). Younger age and nonprivate insurance were the 2 sociodemographic variables that were significantly associated with unattended vs. attended initial appointments. Amongst those whose HIV risk factors were known, MSM were more likely to attend their appointment compared with non-MSM. 77% (26/34) of individuals with unattended initial appointments did not reschedule (figure). Notably, 12% (4/34) PrEP-eligible individuals previously presented to the clinic yet did not re-present for dedicated PrEP evaluation. CONCLUSION: A significant proportion of individuals schedule but do not attend initial PrEP appointments. This cohort, particularly younger patients and those with nonprivate insurance, represents a distinct population - with a “near” yet incomplete engagement in care – for whom HIV prevention efforts and concerted outreach should be focused. Same day, rapid PrEP starts deserve serious consideration in order to capitalize on patient engagement when the opportunity presents. The paucity of data highlights the need for research of those who are PrEP-interested but not fully PrEP-engaged. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6808843/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1150 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Kahal, Deborah A
Goldstein, Neal
Szabo, Susan
1287. PrEP-Engaged or PrEP Curious?: A Characterization and Comparison of Initial PrEP Appointment Attenders vs. Nonattenders
title 1287. PrEP-Engaged or PrEP Curious?: A Characterization and Comparison of Initial PrEP Appointment Attenders vs. Nonattenders
title_full 1287. PrEP-Engaged or PrEP Curious?: A Characterization and Comparison of Initial PrEP Appointment Attenders vs. Nonattenders
title_fullStr 1287. PrEP-Engaged or PrEP Curious?: A Characterization and Comparison of Initial PrEP Appointment Attenders vs. Nonattenders
title_full_unstemmed 1287. PrEP-Engaged or PrEP Curious?: A Characterization and Comparison of Initial PrEP Appointment Attenders vs. Nonattenders
title_short 1287. PrEP-Engaged or PrEP Curious?: A Characterization and Comparison of Initial PrEP Appointment Attenders vs. Nonattenders
title_sort 1287. prep-engaged or prep curious?: a characterization and comparison of initial prep appointment attenders vs. nonattenders
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6808843/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1150
work_keys_str_mv AT kahaldeboraha 1287prepengagedorprepcuriousacharacterizationandcomparisonofinitialprepappointmentattendersvsnonattenders
AT goldsteinneal 1287prepengagedorprepcuriousacharacterizationandcomparisonofinitialprepappointmentattendersvsnonattenders
AT szabosusan 1287prepengagedorprepcuriousacharacterizationandcomparisonofinitialprepappointmentattendersvsnonattenders