Cargando…

1839. Contact Precautions’ Effects on MRSA Transmission in Department of Veterans Affairs Hospitals

BACKGROUND: In 2007, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) implemented the methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Prevention Initiative nationally in acute care facilities (ACFs). The initiative included universal nasal surveillance for MRSA colonization and implementation of contact p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khader, Karim, Thomas, Alun, Visnovsky, Lindsay D, Toth, Damon, Keegan, Lindsay T, Jones, Makoto M, Rubin, Michael, Samore, Matthew H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6808845/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz359.101
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: In 2007, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) implemented the methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Prevention Initiative nationally in acute care facilities (ACFs). The initiative included universal nasal surveillance for MRSA colonization and implementation of contact precautions (CP) for identified carriers for the duration of their stay. Despite subsequent declines in MRSA infection rates in the VA, debate on CP efficacy continues, due to limited and inconclusive direct evidence. This study estimated CP impact on MRSA transmission in the VA. METHODS: We analyzed 1 year of data from 36 VA ACFs in 2014 using a Bayesian transmission model. The data included admission, discharge, and surveillance and clinical test results for MRSA. Per the MRSA Prevention Initiative protocol that placed known carriers on CP, we assumed patients were on CP starting 12 hours after a positive surveillance test, 24 hours after a positive clinical culture, or at admission if the patient had a positive test within 365 days prior to admission. Our model produced estimates of ward-specific transmission rate, surveillance test sensitivity, importation probability, and the CP effect parameter (CP(e)). For CP(e) < 1, CP reduced transmission. Additionally, we combined the estimates of CP(e) using a random-effects model with inverse variance weights to derive pooled estimates and corresponding standard errors. RESULTS: Facility size varied with a median daily census of 70 patients per day (range: 44–111). During the study period, 144,386 individuals were admitted into one of 36 ACFs, for 215,207 total admissions. The median percentage of admissions requiring contact precautions was 11.0% (range: 6.4%–16.1%). The estimated CP(e) was less than one in each of the 36 facilities with a median of 0.43 (range: 0.25–0.68). Our pooled estimate of CP(e) across all facilities was 0.47 (95% CI; 0.40, 0.55). CONCLUSION: We found evidence of reduced MRSA transmission from patients on CP. This result was statistically significant in 5 of the 36 facilities and our pooled estimate suggests contact precautions could reduce the transmission rate by half. Further work is needed to account for imperfect compliance with CP, and for patients on CP for other reasons. [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported Disclosures.