Cargando…
1839. Contact Precautions’ Effects on MRSA Transmission in Department of Veterans Affairs Hospitals
BACKGROUND: In 2007, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) implemented the methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Prevention Initiative nationally in acute care facilities (ACFs). The initiative included universal nasal surveillance for MRSA colonization and implementation of contact p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6808845/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz359.101 |
_version_ | 1783461835862704128 |
---|---|
author | Khader, Karim Thomas, Alun Visnovsky, Lindsay D Toth, Damon Keegan, Lindsay T Jones, Makoto M Rubin, Michael Samore, Matthew H |
author_facet | Khader, Karim Thomas, Alun Visnovsky, Lindsay D Toth, Damon Keegan, Lindsay T Jones, Makoto M Rubin, Michael Samore, Matthew H |
author_sort | Khader, Karim |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In 2007, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) implemented the methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Prevention Initiative nationally in acute care facilities (ACFs). The initiative included universal nasal surveillance for MRSA colonization and implementation of contact precautions (CP) for identified carriers for the duration of their stay. Despite subsequent declines in MRSA infection rates in the VA, debate on CP efficacy continues, due to limited and inconclusive direct evidence. This study estimated CP impact on MRSA transmission in the VA. METHODS: We analyzed 1 year of data from 36 VA ACFs in 2014 using a Bayesian transmission model. The data included admission, discharge, and surveillance and clinical test results for MRSA. Per the MRSA Prevention Initiative protocol that placed known carriers on CP, we assumed patients were on CP starting 12 hours after a positive surveillance test, 24 hours after a positive clinical culture, or at admission if the patient had a positive test within 365 days prior to admission. Our model produced estimates of ward-specific transmission rate, surveillance test sensitivity, importation probability, and the CP effect parameter (CP(e)). For CP(e) < 1, CP reduced transmission. Additionally, we combined the estimates of CP(e) using a random-effects model with inverse variance weights to derive pooled estimates and corresponding standard errors. RESULTS: Facility size varied with a median daily census of 70 patients per day (range: 44–111). During the study period, 144,386 individuals were admitted into one of 36 ACFs, for 215,207 total admissions. The median percentage of admissions requiring contact precautions was 11.0% (range: 6.4%–16.1%). The estimated CP(e) was less than one in each of the 36 facilities with a median of 0.43 (range: 0.25–0.68). Our pooled estimate of CP(e) across all facilities was 0.47 (95% CI; 0.40, 0.55). CONCLUSION: We found evidence of reduced MRSA transmission from patients on CP. This result was statistically significant in 5 of the 36 facilities and our pooled estimate suggests contact precautions could reduce the transmission rate by half. Further work is needed to account for imperfect compliance with CP, and for patients on CP for other reasons. [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported Disclosures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6808845 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68088452019-10-28 1839. Contact Precautions’ Effects on MRSA Transmission in Department of Veterans Affairs Hospitals Khader, Karim Thomas, Alun Visnovsky, Lindsay D Toth, Damon Keegan, Lindsay T Jones, Makoto M Rubin, Michael Samore, Matthew H Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: In 2007, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) implemented the methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Prevention Initiative nationally in acute care facilities (ACFs). The initiative included universal nasal surveillance for MRSA colonization and implementation of contact precautions (CP) for identified carriers for the duration of their stay. Despite subsequent declines in MRSA infection rates in the VA, debate on CP efficacy continues, due to limited and inconclusive direct evidence. This study estimated CP impact on MRSA transmission in the VA. METHODS: We analyzed 1 year of data from 36 VA ACFs in 2014 using a Bayesian transmission model. The data included admission, discharge, and surveillance and clinical test results for MRSA. Per the MRSA Prevention Initiative protocol that placed known carriers on CP, we assumed patients were on CP starting 12 hours after a positive surveillance test, 24 hours after a positive clinical culture, or at admission if the patient had a positive test within 365 days prior to admission. Our model produced estimates of ward-specific transmission rate, surveillance test sensitivity, importation probability, and the CP effect parameter (CP(e)). For CP(e) < 1, CP reduced transmission. Additionally, we combined the estimates of CP(e) using a random-effects model with inverse variance weights to derive pooled estimates and corresponding standard errors. RESULTS: Facility size varied with a median daily census of 70 patients per day (range: 44–111). During the study period, 144,386 individuals were admitted into one of 36 ACFs, for 215,207 total admissions. The median percentage of admissions requiring contact precautions was 11.0% (range: 6.4%–16.1%). The estimated CP(e) was less than one in each of the 36 facilities with a median of 0.43 (range: 0.25–0.68). Our pooled estimate of CP(e) across all facilities was 0.47 (95% CI; 0.40, 0.55). CONCLUSION: We found evidence of reduced MRSA transmission from patients on CP. This result was statistically significant in 5 of the 36 facilities and our pooled estimate suggests contact precautions could reduce the transmission rate by half. Further work is needed to account for imperfect compliance with CP, and for patients on CP for other reasons. [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported Disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6808845/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz359.101 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Khader, Karim Thomas, Alun Visnovsky, Lindsay D Toth, Damon Keegan, Lindsay T Jones, Makoto M Rubin, Michael Samore, Matthew H 1839. Contact Precautions’ Effects on MRSA Transmission in Department of Veterans Affairs Hospitals |
title | 1839. Contact Precautions’ Effects on MRSA Transmission in Department of Veterans Affairs Hospitals |
title_full | 1839. Contact Precautions’ Effects on MRSA Transmission in Department of Veterans Affairs Hospitals |
title_fullStr | 1839. Contact Precautions’ Effects on MRSA Transmission in Department of Veterans Affairs Hospitals |
title_full_unstemmed | 1839. Contact Precautions’ Effects on MRSA Transmission in Department of Veterans Affairs Hospitals |
title_short | 1839. Contact Precautions’ Effects on MRSA Transmission in Department of Veterans Affairs Hospitals |
title_sort | 1839. contact precautions’ effects on mrsa transmission in department of veterans affairs hospitals |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6808845/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz359.101 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT khaderkarim 1839contactprecautionseffectsonmrsatransmissionindepartmentofveteransaffairshospitals AT thomasalun 1839contactprecautionseffectsonmrsatransmissionindepartmentofveteransaffairshospitals AT visnovskylindsayd 1839contactprecautionseffectsonmrsatransmissionindepartmentofveteransaffairshospitals AT tothdamon 1839contactprecautionseffectsonmrsatransmissionindepartmentofveteransaffairshospitals AT keeganlindsayt 1839contactprecautionseffectsonmrsatransmissionindepartmentofveteransaffairshospitals AT jonesmakotom 1839contactprecautionseffectsonmrsatransmissionindepartmentofveteransaffairshospitals AT rubinmichael 1839contactprecautionseffectsonmrsatransmissionindepartmentofveteransaffairshospitals AT samorematthewh 1839contactprecautionseffectsonmrsatransmissionindepartmentofveteransaffairshospitals |