Cargando…

848. Low-Bioavailability vs. High-Bioavailability Oral Antibiotics for the Definitive Treatment of Enterobacteriaceae Bacteremia from Suspected Urine Source in Hospitalized Veterans

BACKGROUND: Limited and conflicting data exist evaluating low-bioavailability oral antibiotics (LOW) for definitive treatment of Enterobacteriaceae bacteremia (EB), and existing dogma limits their use. We compared outcomes for EB from a suspected urine source with LOW vs. high-bioavailability oral a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sutton, Jesse D, Chang, Nai-Chung N, Stevens, Vanessa W, Timbrook, Tristan T, Spivak, Emily S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6808852/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz359.033
_version_ 1783461837884358656
author Sutton, Jesse D
Chang, Nai-Chung N
Stevens, Vanessa W
Timbrook, Tristan T
Spivak, Emily S
author_facet Sutton, Jesse D
Chang, Nai-Chung N
Stevens, Vanessa W
Timbrook, Tristan T
Spivak, Emily S
author_sort Sutton, Jesse D
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Limited and conflicting data exist evaluating low-bioavailability oral antibiotics (LOW) for definitive treatment of Enterobacteriaceae bacteremia (EB), and existing dogma limits their use. We compared outcomes for EB from a suspected urine source with LOW vs. high-bioavailability oral antibiotics (HIGH). METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study across Veterans Affairs hospitals from 2006 to 2015. Inclusion criteria were monomicrobial EB and matching urine culture; receipt of active, empiric parenteral antibiotic(s); and conversion to a single oral LOW or HIGH between treatment day 2 and 6. Exclusion criteria were EB in the previous year, prior urologic abscess, or chronic prostatitis. HIGH included fluoroquinolones or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. LOW included oral β-lactams. The primary outcome was all-cause 30-day mortality or recurrent EB. Patients were weighted using propensity-based overlap weights to make the groups more similar to each other at baseline. Log binomial regression models were used to estimate relative risks and risk differences. RESULTS: A total of 4,090 patients met inclusion criteria with 955 LOW and 3,135 HIGH. The median days of parenteral antibiotics before conversion to oral antibiotics were 4 (IQR 3, 5) in LOW and 4 (IQR 3, 4) in HIGH. The composite primary outcome occurred in 42 (4.4%) LOW and 94 (3.0%) HIGH. The adjusted relative risk (aRR) of the composite primary outcome with LOW was 1.28 (95% CI 0.86–1.89; risk difference [RD] 0.9%). Recurrent EB within 30-days occurred in 14 (1.5%) LOW and 12 (0.4%) HIGH (aRR 3.24, 95% CI, 0.46–22.8; RD 1.0%). Thirty-day mortality occurred in 29 (3.0%) LOW and 82 (2.6%) HIGH (aRR 1.0, 95% CI, 0.66–1.52; RD 0%). Similar outcomes were observed at 90 days. CONCLUSION: There was no difference in the composite outcome of 30-day mortality and recurrent bacteremia comparing hospitalized patients who received LOW vs. HIGH for the definitive treatment of EB from a suspected urine source. While there was a nonsignificantly higher risk of 30-day recurrent EB with LOW, the absolute risk and risk difference were small, suggesting that definitive therapy with LOW may be considered. Future evaluation is needed to better understand risk factors for recurrent EB and which patients may fail LOW. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported Disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6808852
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68088522019-10-28 848. Low-Bioavailability vs. High-Bioavailability Oral Antibiotics for the Definitive Treatment of Enterobacteriaceae Bacteremia from Suspected Urine Source in Hospitalized Veterans Sutton, Jesse D Chang, Nai-Chung N Stevens, Vanessa W Timbrook, Tristan T Spivak, Emily S Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Limited and conflicting data exist evaluating low-bioavailability oral antibiotics (LOW) for definitive treatment of Enterobacteriaceae bacteremia (EB), and existing dogma limits their use. We compared outcomes for EB from a suspected urine source with LOW vs. high-bioavailability oral antibiotics (HIGH). METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study across Veterans Affairs hospitals from 2006 to 2015. Inclusion criteria were monomicrobial EB and matching urine culture; receipt of active, empiric parenteral antibiotic(s); and conversion to a single oral LOW or HIGH between treatment day 2 and 6. Exclusion criteria were EB in the previous year, prior urologic abscess, or chronic prostatitis. HIGH included fluoroquinolones or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. LOW included oral β-lactams. The primary outcome was all-cause 30-day mortality or recurrent EB. Patients were weighted using propensity-based overlap weights to make the groups more similar to each other at baseline. Log binomial regression models were used to estimate relative risks and risk differences. RESULTS: A total of 4,090 patients met inclusion criteria with 955 LOW and 3,135 HIGH. The median days of parenteral antibiotics before conversion to oral antibiotics were 4 (IQR 3, 5) in LOW and 4 (IQR 3, 4) in HIGH. The composite primary outcome occurred in 42 (4.4%) LOW and 94 (3.0%) HIGH. The adjusted relative risk (aRR) of the composite primary outcome with LOW was 1.28 (95% CI 0.86–1.89; risk difference [RD] 0.9%). Recurrent EB within 30-days occurred in 14 (1.5%) LOW and 12 (0.4%) HIGH (aRR 3.24, 95% CI, 0.46–22.8; RD 1.0%). Thirty-day mortality occurred in 29 (3.0%) LOW and 82 (2.6%) HIGH (aRR 1.0, 95% CI, 0.66–1.52; RD 0%). Similar outcomes were observed at 90 days. CONCLUSION: There was no difference in the composite outcome of 30-day mortality and recurrent bacteremia comparing hospitalized patients who received LOW vs. HIGH for the definitive treatment of EB from a suspected urine source. While there was a nonsignificantly higher risk of 30-day recurrent EB with LOW, the absolute risk and risk difference were small, suggesting that definitive therapy with LOW may be considered. Future evaluation is needed to better understand risk factors for recurrent EB and which patients may fail LOW. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported Disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6808852/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz359.033 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Sutton, Jesse D
Chang, Nai-Chung N
Stevens, Vanessa W
Timbrook, Tristan T
Spivak, Emily S
848. Low-Bioavailability vs. High-Bioavailability Oral Antibiotics for the Definitive Treatment of Enterobacteriaceae Bacteremia from Suspected Urine Source in Hospitalized Veterans
title 848. Low-Bioavailability vs. High-Bioavailability Oral Antibiotics for the Definitive Treatment of Enterobacteriaceae Bacteremia from Suspected Urine Source in Hospitalized Veterans
title_full 848. Low-Bioavailability vs. High-Bioavailability Oral Antibiotics for the Definitive Treatment of Enterobacteriaceae Bacteremia from Suspected Urine Source in Hospitalized Veterans
title_fullStr 848. Low-Bioavailability vs. High-Bioavailability Oral Antibiotics for the Definitive Treatment of Enterobacteriaceae Bacteremia from Suspected Urine Source in Hospitalized Veterans
title_full_unstemmed 848. Low-Bioavailability vs. High-Bioavailability Oral Antibiotics for the Definitive Treatment of Enterobacteriaceae Bacteremia from Suspected Urine Source in Hospitalized Veterans
title_short 848. Low-Bioavailability vs. High-Bioavailability Oral Antibiotics for the Definitive Treatment of Enterobacteriaceae Bacteremia from Suspected Urine Source in Hospitalized Veterans
title_sort 848. low-bioavailability vs. high-bioavailability oral antibiotics for the definitive treatment of enterobacteriaceae bacteremia from suspected urine source in hospitalized veterans
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6808852/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz359.033
work_keys_str_mv AT suttonjessed 848lowbioavailabilityvshighbioavailabilityoralantibioticsforthedefinitivetreatmentofenterobacteriaceaebacteremiafromsuspectedurinesourceinhospitalizedveterans
AT changnaichungn 848lowbioavailabilityvshighbioavailabilityoralantibioticsforthedefinitivetreatmentofenterobacteriaceaebacteremiafromsuspectedurinesourceinhospitalizedveterans
AT stevensvanessaw 848lowbioavailabilityvshighbioavailabilityoralantibioticsforthedefinitivetreatmentofenterobacteriaceaebacteremiafromsuspectedurinesourceinhospitalizedveterans
AT timbrooktristant 848lowbioavailabilityvshighbioavailabilityoralantibioticsforthedefinitivetreatmentofenterobacteriaceaebacteremiafromsuspectedurinesourceinhospitalizedveterans
AT spivakemilys 848lowbioavailabilityvshighbioavailabilityoralantibioticsforthedefinitivetreatmentofenterobacteriaceaebacteremiafromsuspectedurinesourceinhospitalizedveterans