Cargando…

1730. Invasive Fusarium Species in Mayo Clinic Patients with Hematologic Malignancies

BACKGROUND: The epidemiology of fungal infections in hematologic malignancies has changed in the past decade. Triazole prophylaxis has decreased Candida spp infections while infections due to other molds such as Aspergillus and Fusarium species have increased. Fusariosis has very poor prognosis, and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harris, Courtney, Tosh, Pritish, Tande, Aaron J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6808872/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1593
_version_ 1783461842831540224
author Harris, Courtney
Tosh, Pritish
Tande, Aaron J
author_facet Harris, Courtney
Tosh, Pritish
Tande, Aaron J
author_sort Harris, Courtney
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The epidemiology of fungal infections in hematologic malignancies has changed in the past decade. Triazole prophylaxis has decreased Candida spp infections while infections due to other molds such as Aspergillus and Fusarium species have increased. Fusariosis has very poor prognosis, and after aspergillosis, is the most common invasive fungal infection in this patient population. We sought to describe fusariosis in patients with hematologic malignancy at the Mayo Clinic. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients with culture-positive Fusarium infection from January 2003 to October 2016 at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. The records of patients were reviewed for demographics, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes including mortality. Patients without a diagnosis of hematologic malignancy were excluded. Patients were classified with proven or probable Fusariosis based on the Revised Definitions of Invasive Fungal Disease from the EORTC/MSG Consensus Group. RESULTS: We identified 14 patients with hematologic malignancies (age range 17–76 years; median 60 years) with a confirmed culture diagnosis of Fusarium infection classified as proven (9 patients) or probable (5 patients). Two cases were isolated pulmonary infections, 3 extra-pulmonary, and 9 disseminated cases. Two patients had previously undergone stem cell transplantation. Eight patients (57%) were receiving antifungal prophylaxis at the time of diagnosis: 2 on voriconazole, 1 on posaconazole, 1 on fluconazole, 3 on echinocandins, and 1 on Amphotericin B. Nine patients (64%) were neutropenic at the time of diagnosis. Amphotericin was the initial treatment in 7 (50%) patients, with voriconazole added for 4 patients for combination therapy the first week. Voriconazole monotherapy was given initially in 5 patients. Seven patients (50%) were deceased at 6 weeks after culture positivity, with an additional 2 patients deceased by 12 weeks. CONCLUSION: Fusarium infection outcomes in patients with hematologic malignancies are poor. Neutropenia was common in those diagnosed, and infections were more likely to be disseminated, with high mortality rates. Amphotericin was commonly used as initial treatment, with many physicians recommending combination therapy with two agents, commonly voriconazole. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6808872
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68088722019-10-28 1730. Invasive Fusarium Species in Mayo Clinic Patients with Hematologic Malignancies Harris, Courtney Tosh, Pritish Tande, Aaron J Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: The epidemiology of fungal infections in hematologic malignancies has changed in the past decade. Triazole prophylaxis has decreased Candida spp infections while infections due to other molds such as Aspergillus and Fusarium species have increased. Fusariosis has very poor prognosis, and after aspergillosis, is the most common invasive fungal infection in this patient population. We sought to describe fusariosis in patients with hematologic malignancy at the Mayo Clinic. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients with culture-positive Fusarium infection from January 2003 to October 2016 at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. The records of patients were reviewed for demographics, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes including mortality. Patients without a diagnosis of hematologic malignancy were excluded. Patients were classified with proven or probable Fusariosis based on the Revised Definitions of Invasive Fungal Disease from the EORTC/MSG Consensus Group. RESULTS: We identified 14 patients with hematologic malignancies (age range 17–76 years; median 60 years) with a confirmed culture diagnosis of Fusarium infection classified as proven (9 patients) or probable (5 patients). Two cases were isolated pulmonary infections, 3 extra-pulmonary, and 9 disseminated cases. Two patients had previously undergone stem cell transplantation. Eight patients (57%) were receiving antifungal prophylaxis at the time of diagnosis: 2 on voriconazole, 1 on posaconazole, 1 on fluconazole, 3 on echinocandins, and 1 on Amphotericin B. Nine patients (64%) were neutropenic at the time of diagnosis. Amphotericin was the initial treatment in 7 (50%) patients, with voriconazole added for 4 patients for combination therapy the first week. Voriconazole monotherapy was given initially in 5 patients. Seven patients (50%) were deceased at 6 weeks after culture positivity, with an additional 2 patients deceased by 12 weeks. CONCLUSION: Fusarium infection outcomes in patients with hematologic malignancies are poor. Neutropenia was common in those diagnosed, and infections were more likely to be disseminated, with high mortality rates. Amphotericin was commonly used as initial treatment, with many physicians recommending combination therapy with two agents, commonly voriconazole. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6808872/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1593 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Harris, Courtney
Tosh, Pritish
Tande, Aaron J
1730. Invasive Fusarium Species in Mayo Clinic Patients with Hematologic Malignancies
title 1730. Invasive Fusarium Species in Mayo Clinic Patients with Hematologic Malignancies
title_full 1730. Invasive Fusarium Species in Mayo Clinic Patients with Hematologic Malignancies
title_fullStr 1730. Invasive Fusarium Species in Mayo Clinic Patients with Hematologic Malignancies
title_full_unstemmed 1730. Invasive Fusarium Species in Mayo Clinic Patients with Hematologic Malignancies
title_short 1730. Invasive Fusarium Species in Mayo Clinic Patients with Hematologic Malignancies
title_sort 1730. invasive fusarium species in mayo clinic patients with hematologic malignancies
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6808872/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1593
work_keys_str_mv AT harriscourtney 1730invasivefusariumspeciesinmayoclinicpatientswithhematologicmalignancies
AT toshpritish 1730invasivefusariumspeciesinmayoclinicpatientswithhematologicmalignancies
AT tandeaaronj 1730invasivefusariumspeciesinmayoclinicpatientswithhematologicmalignancies