Cargando…

2080. Impact of an Emergency Department Post-discharge Blood Culture Follow-up Program

BACKGROUND: Blood cultures are the gold standard in the identification of laboratory confirmed bloodstream infections (LCBI) but contamination can lead to unnecessary interventions. This study sought to assess the number of unwarranted admissions in patients with contaminated blood cultures post-dis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vazquez Deida, Axel, Salazar, Veronica, Lee, Lilly, Abbo, Lilian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6808942/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1760
_version_ 1783461860679352320
author Vazquez Deida, Axel
Salazar, Veronica
Lee, Lilly
Abbo, Lilian
author_facet Vazquez Deida, Axel
Salazar, Veronica
Lee, Lilly
Abbo, Lilian
author_sort Vazquez Deida, Axel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Blood cultures are the gold standard in the identification of laboratory confirmed bloodstream infections (LCBI) but contamination can lead to unnecessary interventions. This study sought to assess the number of unwarranted admissions in patients with contaminated blood cultures post-discharge and at low risk for LCBI before and after the implementation of a multidisciplinary emergency department (ED) blood culture follow-up program. METHODS: This was a two-phase retrospective cohort study at a tertiary care, 1,550-bed, academic hospital and level I trauma center in southeast Florida. Phase 1 assessed interventions made on patients 18 years of age or older discharged from the ED or a hospital observation unit with a positive blood culture result post-discharge from March 2018 to July 2018. Phase 2 assessed interventions made from December 2018 to March 2019 post-implementation of the multidisciplinary follow-up program. The criteria for low risk of LCBI were lack of risk factors for infection and < 2 positive blood cultures with a commensal bacteria with no symptoms of fever or hypotension on the date of specimen collection and 3 days before or after such date. RESULTS: Among patients at low risk for LCBI (46% of 24 patients in phase 1 vs. 59% of 22 patients in phase 2), unwarranted admissions due to contaminated blood cultures occurred in 27.3% of patients in phase 1 vs. 0% of patients in phase 2 (P = 0.08). Phase 1 represented a period in which systematic reporting and evaluation of positive results and patient follow-up were not in place. Phase 2 consisted of daily pharmacist-led blood culture reviews with callback nurse follow-up and therapeutic care plan development with ED physicians. The number of contaminant isolates was relatively high (Figures 1 and 2). Pharmacist-led interventions were diverse (Figure 3). The program led to an estimated total cost avoidance of $16,410.80 in a median of 4.5 months due to unnecessary admissions. CONCLUSION: Implementation of a multidisciplinary ED post-discharge blood culture follow-up program can be an effective strategy in improving patient care and avoiding unnecessary antibiotic therapy. Further interventions aimed at reducing blood culture contamination could have a direct impact on improving ED antimicrobial stewardship. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6808942
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68089422019-10-28 2080. Impact of an Emergency Department Post-discharge Blood Culture Follow-up Program Vazquez Deida, Axel Salazar, Veronica Lee, Lilly Abbo, Lilian Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Blood cultures are the gold standard in the identification of laboratory confirmed bloodstream infections (LCBI) but contamination can lead to unnecessary interventions. This study sought to assess the number of unwarranted admissions in patients with contaminated blood cultures post-discharge and at low risk for LCBI before and after the implementation of a multidisciplinary emergency department (ED) blood culture follow-up program. METHODS: This was a two-phase retrospective cohort study at a tertiary care, 1,550-bed, academic hospital and level I trauma center in southeast Florida. Phase 1 assessed interventions made on patients 18 years of age or older discharged from the ED or a hospital observation unit with a positive blood culture result post-discharge from March 2018 to July 2018. Phase 2 assessed interventions made from December 2018 to March 2019 post-implementation of the multidisciplinary follow-up program. The criteria for low risk of LCBI were lack of risk factors for infection and < 2 positive blood cultures with a commensal bacteria with no symptoms of fever or hypotension on the date of specimen collection and 3 days before or after such date. RESULTS: Among patients at low risk for LCBI (46% of 24 patients in phase 1 vs. 59% of 22 patients in phase 2), unwarranted admissions due to contaminated blood cultures occurred in 27.3% of patients in phase 1 vs. 0% of patients in phase 2 (P = 0.08). Phase 1 represented a period in which systematic reporting and evaluation of positive results and patient follow-up were not in place. Phase 2 consisted of daily pharmacist-led blood culture reviews with callback nurse follow-up and therapeutic care plan development with ED physicians. The number of contaminant isolates was relatively high (Figures 1 and 2). Pharmacist-led interventions were diverse (Figure 3). The program led to an estimated total cost avoidance of $16,410.80 in a median of 4.5 months due to unnecessary admissions. CONCLUSION: Implementation of a multidisciplinary ED post-discharge blood culture follow-up program can be an effective strategy in improving patient care and avoiding unnecessary antibiotic therapy. Further interventions aimed at reducing blood culture contamination could have a direct impact on improving ED antimicrobial stewardship. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6808942/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1760 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Vazquez Deida, Axel
Salazar, Veronica
Lee, Lilly
Abbo, Lilian
2080. Impact of an Emergency Department Post-discharge Blood Culture Follow-up Program
title 2080. Impact of an Emergency Department Post-discharge Blood Culture Follow-up Program
title_full 2080. Impact of an Emergency Department Post-discharge Blood Culture Follow-up Program
title_fullStr 2080. Impact of an Emergency Department Post-discharge Blood Culture Follow-up Program
title_full_unstemmed 2080. Impact of an Emergency Department Post-discharge Blood Culture Follow-up Program
title_short 2080. Impact of an Emergency Department Post-discharge Blood Culture Follow-up Program
title_sort 2080. impact of an emergency department post-discharge blood culture follow-up program
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6808942/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1760
work_keys_str_mv AT vazquezdeidaaxel 2080impactofanemergencydepartmentpostdischargebloodculturefollowupprogram
AT salazarveronica 2080impactofanemergencydepartmentpostdischargebloodculturefollowupprogram
AT leelilly 2080impactofanemergencydepartmentpostdischargebloodculturefollowupprogram
AT abbolilian 2080impactofanemergencydepartmentpostdischargebloodculturefollowupprogram