Cargando…

1258. The Pregnancy Factor: Differences in the Prevalence of Depression Among Pregnant and Nonpregnant Sub-Saharan African Women Living with HIV

BACKGROUND: In Sub-Saharan African (SSA) women living with HIV, pregnancy creates unique stressors that may induce or exacerbate depression. We described the prevalence of depression during the perinatal period among women living with HIV that became pregnant (P-WLWH) as compared with those that did...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jones, Milissa U, Esber, Allahna L, Reed, Domonique, Kiweewa, Francis, Maswai, Jonah, Owuoth, John, Bahemana, Emmanuel, Iroezindu, Michael, Crowell, Trevor A, Polyak, Christina, Ake, Julie A, Hickey, Patrick
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6809048/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1121
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: In Sub-Saharan African (SSA) women living with HIV, pregnancy creates unique stressors that may induce or exacerbate depression. We described the prevalence of depression during the perinatal period among women living with HIV that became pregnant (P-WLWH) as compared with those that did not (NP-WLWH). METHODS: We analyzed data from WLWH, age < 45 years, across 11 HIV clinics in Kenya, Nigeria, Uganda, and Tanzania, within the African Cohort Study (AFRICOS). Depression screening was performed via the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression (CESD) scale at enrollment and every 6 months in the study. For these analyses, the CESD score was assessed during three periods in time. For P-WLWH, these periods were: (1) enrollment, (2) during pregnancy and (3) the study visit following delivery. For NP-WLWH, three sequential evaluations were analyzed, with visit 1 being enrollment. We compared the prevalence of depression between groups at each period using χ (2) analysis and calculated adjusted odds ratios (OR) using logistic regression for variables associated with positive depression screening (CESD score ≥16). RESULTS: There were 764 WLWH selected for analysis, including 164 P-WLWH and 600 NP-WLWH. At enrollment, P-WLWH tended to be younger than NP-WLWH (mean age=30 vs. 34, P < 0.01). Neither group differed significantly with respect to marital status, employment, education, viral load, or duration of HIV. The crude prevalence of depression during periods 1 thru 3 for P-WLWH and NP-WLWH was: 20% (in both groups, P = 0.99), 10% and 13% (P = 0.26), and 4% and 10% (P = 0.01), respectively (figure). P-WLWH had 74% lower odds [OR = 0.26 [0.09–0.75], P = 0.01] of positive depression screening during period 3 than NP-WLWH, when controlling for age, marital status, educational level, viral load, and duration of HIV. CONCLUSION: Surprisingly, our analyses demonstrate P-WLWH were less likely to have positive screening for depression following their pregnancies. These findings may highlight the strength of comprehensive maternal health initiatives in SSA. Additionally, these women will be followed further longitudinally to evaluate patterns of depression in the months following pregnancy. [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.