Cargando…

1245. Does Complexity of Infection Prevention Bundles Matter in Colorectal Surgery? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infection (SSI) prevention bundles in colorectal surgery are common. The optimal bundle composition and impact of increasingly complex and resource-intensive bundled interventions on SSI remain unclear. METHODS: (1) A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and ob...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pop-Vicas, Aurora E, Abad, Cybele Lara R, Osman, Fay, Baubie, Kelsey, Safdar, Nasia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6809110/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1108
_version_ 1783461904509829120
author Pop-Vicas, Aurora E
Abad, Cybele Lara R
Osman, Fay
Baubie, Kelsey
Safdar, Nasia
author_facet Pop-Vicas, Aurora E
Abad, Cybele Lara R
Osman, Fay
Baubie, Kelsey
Safdar, Nasia
author_sort Pop-Vicas, Aurora E
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Surgical site infection (SSI) prevention bundles in colorectal surgery are common. The optimal bundle composition and impact of increasingly complex and resource-intensive bundled interventions on SSI remain unclear. METHODS: (1) A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and observational trials with pre-post implementation data for colorectal SSI prevention bundles to study their effect on superficial, deep, and organ-space SSI. (2) A meta-regression to determine whether the bundle size (number of different bundle elements) affects SSI. (3) A correlation analysis to identify individual bundle elements with greatest SSI reduction. We used the METAN, METAEFF, and METAREG packages in STATA SE 15 for analysis. RESULTS: We included 38 studies in the systematic review, and 29 studies (49,589 patients) in the meta-analysis. Bundle composition was highly variable, ranging from 3 – 13 guideline-recommended elements per bundle. Meta-analyses showed bundles to be associated with relative risk reductions of 43% for any SSI (RR 0.57 [95% CI 0.48–0.67]; 44% for superficial SSI (RR 0.56 [95% CI 0.42–0.75]; 33% for deep SSI (RR 0.67 [95% CI 0.45–0.98], and 37% for organ/space SSI (RR 0.63 [95% CI 0.49 – 0.81]). On meta-regression, bundle size, especially ≥10 elements, was significantly associated with SSI reduction for any SSI (P = 0.04) and for superficial SSI (P = 0.005). Individual bundle elements correlated with strongest SSI reductions were mechanical bowel prep combined with oral antibiotics (R = −0.68, P = 0.0028) and pre-operative chlorhexidine showers (R = −0.49, P = 0.04) for organ/space SSI. Protocols including separate instrument trays and glove ± gown change prior to surgical wound closure (R = −0.55, P = 0.009), and standardized postoperative wound dressing change at 48 hours (R = −30.59, P = 0.005) correlated with highest superficial SSI reductions. CONCLUSION: Complex colorectal bundles with ≥10 clinical guideline-recommended prevention elements are associated with higher reductions in any SSI and in superficial SSI. Further research should evaluate how complex SSI prevention colorectal bundles can be implemented and sustained with high fidelity in the clinical setting in a cost-effective manner. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6809110
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68091102019-10-28 1245. Does Complexity of Infection Prevention Bundles Matter in Colorectal Surgery? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Pop-Vicas, Aurora E Abad, Cybele Lara R Osman, Fay Baubie, Kelsey Safdar, Nasia Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Surgical site infection (SSI) prevention bundles in colorectal surgery are common. The optimal bundle composition and impact of increasingly complex and resource-intensive bundled interventions on SSI remain unclear. METHODS: (1) A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and observational trials with pre-post implementation data for colorectal SSI prevention bundles to study their effect on superficial, deep, and organ-space SSI. (2) A meta-regression to determine whether the bundle size (number of different bundle elements) affects SSI. (3) A correlation analysis to identify individual bundle elements with greatest SSI reduction. We used the METAN, METAEFF, and METAREG packages in STATA SE 15 for analysis. RESULTS: We included 38 studies in the systematic review, and 29 studies (49,589 patients) in the meta-analysis. Bundle composition was highly variable, ranging from 3 – 13 guideline-recommended elements per bundle. Meta-analyses showed bundles to be associated with relative risk reductions of 43% for any SSI (RR 0.57 [95% CI 0.48–0.67]; 44% for superficial SSI (RR 0.56 [95% CI 0.42–0.75]; 33% for deep SSI (RR 0.67 [95% CI 0.45–0.98], and 37% for organ/space SSI (RR 0.63 [95% CI 0.49 – 0.81]). On meta-regression, bundle size, especially ≥10 elements, was significantly associated with SSI reduction for any SSI (P = 0.04) and for superficial SSI (P = 0.005). Individual bundle elements correlated with strongest SSI reductions were mechanical bowel prep combined with oral antibiotics (R = −0.68, P = 0.0028) and pre-operative chlorhexidine showers (R = −0.49, P = 0.04) for organ/space SSI. Protocols including separate instrument trays and glove ± gown change prior to surgical wound closure (R = −0.55, P = 0.009), and standardized postoperative wound dressing change at 48 hours (R = −30.59, P = 0.005) correlated with highest superficial SSI reductions. CONCLUSION: Complex colorectal bundles with ≥10 clinical guideline-recommended prevention elements are associated with higher reductions in any SSI and in superficial SSI. Further research should evaluate how complex SSI prevention colorectal bundles can be implemented and sustained with high fidelity in the clinical setting in a cost-effective manner. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6809110/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1108 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Pop-Vicas, Aurora E
Abad, Cybele Lara R
Osman, Fay
Baubie, Kelsey
Safdar, Nasia
1245. Does Complexity of Infection Prevention Bundles Matter in Colorectal Surgery? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title 1245. Does Complexity of Infection Prevention Bundles Matter in Colorectal Surgery? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full 1245. Does Complexity of Infection Prevention Bundles Matter in Colorectal Surgery? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr 1245. Does Complexity of Infection Prevention Bundles Matter in Colorectal Surgery? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed 1245. Does Complexity of Infection Prevention Bundles Matter in Colorectal Surgery? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short 1245. Does Complexity of Infection Prevention Bundles Matter in Colorectal Surgery? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort 1245. does complexity of infection prevention bundles matter in colorectal surgery? a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6809110/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1108
work_keys_str_mv AT popvicasaurorae 1245doescomplexityofinfectionpreventionbundlesmatterincolorectalsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT abadcybelelarar 1245doescomplexityofinfectionpreventionbundlesmatterincolorectalsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT osmanfay 1245doescomplexityofinfectionpreventionbundlesmatterincolorectalsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT baubiekelsey 1245doescomplexityofinfectionpreventionbundlesmatterincolorectalsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT safdarnasia 1245doescomplexityofinfectionpreventionbundlesmatterincolorectalsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis