Cargando…

1483. Comparison of Outcomes in Urinary Tract Infections Caused by SPICE Organisms Treated with Non-Carbapenem-β-lactams vs. Non-β-lactams Agents

BACKGROUND: The “SPICE organisms” intrinsically produce low levels of a chromosomally encoded β-lactamase enzyme, AmpC. When SPICE organisms are exposed to certain antimicrobial agents, they can select for de-repressed mutants and induce the AmpC gene. No study to date has determined the optimal tre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sapozhnikov, Julia, Huang, Angela, Powell, Kelsey, Gibble, Allison
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6809115/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1347
_version_ 1783461905718837248
author Sapozhnikov, Julia
Huang, Angela
Powell, Kelsey
Gibble, Allison
author_facet Sapozhnikov, Julia
Huang, Angela
Powell, Kelsey
Gibble, Allison
author_sort Sapozhnikov, Julia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The “SPICE organisms” intrinsically produce low levels of a chromosomally encoded β-lactamase enzyme, AmpC. When SPICE organisms are exposed to certain antimicrobial agents, they can select for de-repressed mutants and induce the AmpC gene. No study to date has determined the optimal treatment of lower inoculum infections such as urinary tract infections (UTIs) caused by SPICE organisms. METHODS: This study is a single-center, retrospective observational review of adult hospitalized patients with a UTI caused by a SPICE organism from November 2012 to November 2015. The objective of this study was to compare outcomes amongst patients with UTIs caused by select SPICE organisms treated with drugs susceptible to AmpC hydrolysis (penicillins, cephalosporins except cefepime, and monobactams) vs. drugs stable against AmpC (carbapenems, cefepime, and non-β-lactam agents). The primary outcome was clinical response, defined as resolution of signs and symptoms of UTI without requiring escalation of antimicrobial therapy after 48 hours of therapy initiation. Secondary outcomes include 30-day infection-related readmission, 30-day infection recurrence rate, 30-day all-cause mortality, and length of hospital stay. Patients with resistance to ceftriaxone were reviewed for β-lactam exposure (≥7 days) within the last month. RESULTS: One-hundred 56 patients were identified. Clinical response, 30-day infection-related readmission, 30-day infection recurrence, 30-day mortality rates, and median length of hospital stay were similar between the AmpC stable and AmpC susceptible groups (Table 1). Notably, 39.1% of patients with ceftriaxone resistance reported had recent β-lactam exposure vs. only 11.6% of patients without ceftriaxone resistance (P = 0.0028). CONCLUSION: Based our data, there does not appear to be a difference in clinical response, 30-day-related readmission, 30-day infection recurrence, 30-day all-cause mortality rates, or length of stay in patients with UTIs treated with AmpC stable and AmpC susceptible agents. AmpC induction can be seen with at least 7 days of β-lactam use in the past 30 days as demonstrated by more frequent use of recent β-lactam agents in those with ceftriaxone resistance detected. [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6809115
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68091152019-10-28 1483. Comparison of Outcomes in Urinary Tract Infections Caused by SPICE Organisms Treated with Non-Carbapenem-β-lactams vs. Non-β-lactams Agents Sapozhnikov, Julia Huang, Angela Powell, Kelsey Gibble, Allison Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: The “SPICE organisms” intrinsically produce low levels of a chromosomally encoded β-lactamase enzyme, AmpC. When SPICE organisms are exposed to certain antimicrobial agents, they can select for de-repressed mutants and induce the AmpC gene. No study to date has determined the optimal treatment of lower inoculum infections such as urinary tract infections (UTIs) caused by SPICE organisms. METHODS: This study is a single-center, retrospective observational review of adult hospitalized patients with a UTI caused by a SPICE organism from November 2012 to November 2015. The objective of this study was to compare outcomes amongst patients with UTIs caused by select SPICE organisms treated with drugs susceptible to AmpC hydrolysis (penicillins, cephalosporins except cefepime, and monobactams) vs. drugs stable against AmpC (carbapenems, cefepime, and non-β-lactam agents). The primary outcome was clinical response, defined as resolution of signs and symptoms of UTI without requiring escalation of antimicrobial therapy after 48 hours of therapy initiation. Secondary outcomes include 30-day infection-related readmission, 30-day infection recurrence rate, 30-day all-cause mortality, and length of hospital stay. Patients with resistance to ceftriaxone were reviewed for β-lactam exposure (≥7 days) within the last month. RESULTS: One-hundred 56 patients were identified. Clinical response, 30-day infection-related readmission, 30-day infection recurrence, 30-day mortality rates, and median length of hospital stay were similar between the AmpC stable and AmpC susceptible groups (Table 1). Notably, 39.1% of patients with ceftriaxone resistance reported had recent β-lactam exposure vs. only 11.6% of patients without ceftriaxone resistance (P = 0.0028). CONCLUSION: Based our data, there does not appear to be a difference in clinical response, 30-day-related readmission, 30-day infection recurrence, 30-day all-cause mortality rates, or length of stay in patients with UTIs treated with AmpC stable and AmpC susceptible agents. AmpC induction can be seen with at least 7 days of β-lactam use in the past 30 days as demonstrated by more frequent use of recent β-lactam agents in those with ceftriaxone resistance detected. [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6809115/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1347 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Sapozhnikov, Julia
Huang, Angela
Powell, Kelsey
Gibble, Allison
1483. Comparison of Outcomes in Urinary Tract Infections Caused by SPICE Organisms Treated with Non-Carbapenem-β-lactams vs. Non-β-lactams Agents
title 1483. Comparison of Outcomes in Urinary Tract Infections Caused by SPICE Organisms Treated with Non-Carbapenem-β-lactams vs. Non-β-lactams Agents
title_full 1483. Comparison of Outcomes in Urinary Tract Infections Caused by SPICE Organisms Treated with Non-Carbapenem-β-lactams vs. Non-β-lactams Agents
title_fullStr 1483. Comparison of Outcomes in Urinary Tract Infections Caused by SPICE Organisms Treated with Non-Carbapenem-β-lactams vs. Non-β-lactams Agents
title_full_unstemmed 1483. Comparison of Outcomes in Urinary Tract Infections Caused by SPICE Organisms Treated with Non-Carbapenem-β-lactams vs. Non-β-lactams Agents
title_short 1483. Comparison of Outcomes in Urinary Tract Infections Caused by SPICE Organisms Treated with Non-Carbapenem-β-lactams vs. Non-β-lactams Agents
title_sort 1483. comparison of outcomes in urinary tract infections caused by spice organisms treated with non-carbapenem-β-lactams vs. non-β-lactams agents
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6809115/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1347
work_keys_str_mv AT sapozhnikovjulia 1483comparisonofoutcomesinurinarytractinfectionscausedbyspiceorganismstreatedwithnoncarbapenemblactamsvsnonblactamsagents
AT huangangela 1483comparisonofoutcomesinurinarytractinfectionscausedbyspiceorganismstreatedwithnoncarbapenemblactamsvsnonblactamsagents
AT powellkelsey 1483comparisonofoutcomesinurinarytractinfectionscausedbyspiceorganismstreatedwithnoncarbapenemblactamsvsnonblactamsagents
AT gibbleallison 1483comparisonofoutcomesinurinarytractinfectionscausedbyspiceorganismstreatedwithnoncarbapenemblactamsvsnonblactamsagents