Cargando…

1283. Attitudes and Practices Regarding HIV Post-Exposure Prophylaxis

BACKGROUND: Research suggests nonoccupational Post Exposure Prophylaxis (nPEP) is underprescribed when indicated in the Emergency Department (ED). This study is an assessment of ED providers’ attitudes and practices regarding administration of HIV nPEP. METHODS: This was an anonymous survey based on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sherrerd-Smith, William, O’Connell, Katie, Gill, Shanedeep, Kisteneff, Alice, Derber, Catherine, Salts, Laila, Lo, Bruce
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6809160/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1146
_version_ 1783461916786556928
author Sherrerd-Smith, William
O’Connell, Katie
Gill, Shanedeep
Kisteneff, Alice
Derber, Catherine
Salts, Laila
Lo, Bruce
author_facet Sherrerd-Smith, William
O’Connell, Katie
Gill, Shanedeep
Kisteneff, Alice
Derber, Catherine
Salts, Laila
Lo, Bruce
author_sort Sherrerd-Smith, William
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Research suggests nonoccupational Post Exposure Prophylaxis (nPEP) is underprescribed when indicated in the Emergency Department (ED). This study is an assessment of ED providers’ attitudes and practices regarding administration of HIV nPEP. METHODS: This was an anonymous survey based on literature review and modified Delphi technique. We approached 153 ED providers at work over a 4-month period from 5 hospital-based and 2 freestanding EDs with an annual census between 35,000 and 75,000 patients. The EDs are a combination of urban, suburban, and rural EDs. There were 152 completed surveys: 80 attendings, 27 residents, and 44 physician assistants. RESULTS: The majority of surveyed providers (133/149, 89.3%) believe it is their responsibility as an emergency provider to provide HIV nPEP in the emergency department (Figure 1). Although 91% (138/151) and 87% (132/151) of respondents are willing to prescribe nPEP to a patient in the ED for IV drug use and unprotected sex, respectively, only 40% (61/152) of participants felt they could confidently prescribe the appropriate regimen. Ultimately, only 25% (37/151) of participants prescribed nPEP in the last year. Number of years in practice, age, and gender did not result in a significant difference in nPEP administration. Respondents noted time (27%), access to follow-up care (26%), cost to patients (23%), patients’ perceived interest in HIV counseling (15%), and concern for ongoing risky behaviors (9%) as barriers to prescribing nPEP (Figure 2). 64% (95/149) of respondents feel that it is their responsibility as an ED provider to refer patients at risk of nonoccupational exposures for risk-reduction counseling. CONCLUSION: This study identified an opportunity for HIV prevention in the emergency department. The majority of participants had not prescribed nPEP in the past 12 months. Although most were willing to prescribe nPEP and felt it was their responsibility, the majority of participants were not confident in prescribing it. Future interventions to increase the use of nPEP in the ED should target provider education, cost, access to follow-up care and counseling. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6809160
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68091602019-10-28 1283. Attitudes and Practices Regarding HIV Post-Exposure Prophylaxis Sherrerd-Smith, William O’Connell, Katie Gill, Shanedeep Kisteneff, Alice Derber, Catherine Salts, Laila Lo, Bruce Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Research suggests nonoccupational Post Exposure Prophylaxis (nPEP) is underprescribed when indicated in the Emergency Department (ED). This study is an assessment of ED providers’ attitudes and practices regarding administration of HIV nPEP. METHODS: This was an anonymous survey based on literature review and modified Delphi technique. We approached 153 ED providers at work over a 4-month period from 5 hospital-based and 2 freestanding EDs with an annual census between 35,000 and 75,000 patients. The EDs are a combination of urban, suburban, and rural EDs. There were 152 completed surveys: 80 attendings, 27 residents, and 44 physician assistants. RESULTS: The majority of surveyed providers (133/149, 89.3%) believe it is their responsibility as an emergency provider to provide HIV nPEP in the emergency department (Figure 1). Although 91% (138/151) and 87% (132/151) of respondents are willing to prescribe nPEP to a patient in the ED for IV drug use and unprotected sex, respectively, only 40% (61/152) of participants felt they could confidently prescribe the appropriate regimen. Ultimately, only 25% (37/151) of participants prescribed nPEP in the last year. Number of years in practice, age, and gender did not result in a significant difference in nPEP administration. Respondents noted time (27%), access to follow-up care (26%), cost to patients (23%), patients’ perceived interest in HIV counseling (15%), and concern for ongoing risky behaviors (9%) as barriers to prescribing nPEP (Figure 2). 64% (95/149) of respondents feel that it is their responsibility as an ED provider to refer patients at risk of nonoccupational exposures for risk-reduction counseling. CONCLUSION: This study identified an opportunity for HIV prevention in the emergency department. The majority of participants had not prescribed nPEP in the past 12 months. Although most were willing to prescribe nPEP and felt it was their responsibility, the majority of participants were not confident in prescribing it. Future interventions to increase the use of nPEP in the ED should target provider education, cost, access to follow-up care and counseling. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6809160/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1146 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Sherrerd-Smith, William
O’Connell, Katie
Gill, Shanedeep
Kisteneff, Alice
Derber, Catherine
Salts, Laila
Lo, Bruce
1283. Attitudes and Practices Regarding HIV Post-Exposure Prophylaxis
title 1283. Attitudes and Practices Regarding HIV Post-Exposure Prophylaxis
title_full 1283. Attitudes and Practices Regarding HIV Post-Exposure Prophylaxis
title_fullStr 1283. Attitudes and Practices Regarding HIV Post-Exposure Prophylaxis
title_full_unstemmed 1283. Attitudes and Practices Regarding HIV Post-Exposure Prophylaxis
title_short 1283. Attitudes and Practices Regarding HIV Post-Exposure Prophylaxis
title_sort 1283. attitudes and practices regarding hiv post-exposure prophylaxis
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6809160/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1146
work_keys_str_mv AT sherrerdsmithwilliam 1283attitudesandpracticesregardinghivpostexposureprophylaxis
AT oconnellkatie 1283attitudesandpracticesregardinghivpostexposureprophylaxis
AT gillshanedeep 1283attitudesandpracticesregardinghivpostexposureprophylaxis
AT kisteneffalice 1283attitudesandpracticesregardinghivpostexposureprophylaxis
AT derbercatherine 1283attitudesandpracticesregardinghivpostexposureprophylaxis
AT saltslaila 1283attitudesandpracticesregardinghivpostexposureprophylaxis
AT lobruce 1283attitudesandpracticesregardinghivpostexposureprophylaxis