Cargando…
1283. Attitudes and Practices Regarding HIV Post-Exposure Prophylaxis
BACKGROUND: Research suggests nonoccupational Post Exposure Prophylaxis (nPEP) is underprescribed when indicated in the Emergency Department (ED). This study is an assessment of ED providers’ attitudes and practices regarding administration of HIV nPEP. METHODS: This was an anonymous survey based on...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6809160/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1146 |
_version_ | 1783461916786556928 |
---|---|
author | Sherrerd-Smith, William O’Connell, Katie Gill, Shanedeep Kisteneff, Alice Derber, Catherine Salts, Laila Lo, Bruce |
author_facet | Sherrerd-Smith, William O’Connell, Katie Gill, Shanedeep Kisteneff, Alice Derber, Catherine Salts, Laila Lo, Bruce |
author_sort | Sherrerd-Smith, William |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Research suggests nonoccupational Post Exposure Prophylaxis (nPEP) is underprescribed when indicated in the Emergency Department (ED). This study is an assessment of ED providers’ attitudes and practices regarding administration of HIV nPEP. METHODS: This was an anonymous survey based on literature review and modified Delphi technique. We approached 153 ED providers at work over a 4-month period from 5 hospital-based and 2 freestanding EDs with an annual census between 35,000 and 75,000 patients. The EDs are a combination of urban, suburban, and rural EDs. There were 152 completed surveys: 80 attendings, 27 residents, and 44 physician assistants. RESULTS: The majority of surveyed providers (133/149, 89.3%) believe it is their responsibility as an emergency provider to provide HIV nPEP in the emergency department (Figure 1). Although 91% (138/151) and 87% (132/151) of respondents are willing to prescribe nPEP to a patient in the ED for IV drug use and unprotected sex, respectively, only 40% (61/152) of participants felt they could confidently prescribe the appropriate regimen. Ultimately, only 25% (37/151) of participants prescribed nPEP in the last year. Number of years in practice, age, and gender did not result in a significant difference in nPEP administration. Respondents noted time (27%), access to follow-up care (26%), cost to patients (23%), patients’ perceived interest in HIV counseling (15%), and concern for ongoing risky behaviors (9%) as barriers to prescribing nPEP (Figure 2). 64% (95/149) of respondents feel that it is their responsibility as an ED provider to refer patients at risk of nonoccupational exposures for risk-reduction counseling. CONCLUSION: This study identified an opportunity for HIV prevention in the emergency department. The majority of participants had not prescribed nPEP in the past 12 months. Although most were willing to prescribe nPEP and felt it was their responsibility, the majority of participants were not confident in prescribing it. Future interventions to increase the use of nPEP in the ED should target provider education, cost, access to follow-up care and counseling. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6809160 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68091602019-10-28 1283. Attitudes and Practices Regarding HIV Post-Exposure Prophylaxis Sherrerd-Smith, William O’Connell, Katie Gill, Shanedeep Kisteneff, Alice Derber, Catherine Salts, Laila Lo, Bruce Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Research suggests nonoccupational Post Exposure Prophylaxis (nPEP) is underprescribed when indicated in the Emergency Department (ED). This study is an assessment of ED providers’ attitudes and practices regarding administration of HIV nPEP. METHODS: This was an anonymous survey based on literature review and modified Delphi technique. We approached 153 ED providers at work over a 4-month period from 5 hospital-based and 2 freestanding EDs with an annual census between 35,000 and 75,000 patients. The EDs are a combination of urban, suburban, and rural EDs. There were 152 completed surveys: 80 attendings, 27 residents, and 44 physician assistants. RESULTS: The majority of surveyed providers (133/149, 89.3%) believe it is their responsibility as an emergency provider to provide HIV nPEP in the emergency department (Figure 1). Although 91% (138/151) and 87% (132/151) of respondents are willing to prescribe nPEP to a patient in the ED for IV drug use and unprotected sex, respectively, only 40% (61/152) of participants felt they could confidently prescribe the appropriate regimen. Ultimately, only 25% (37/151) of participants prescribed nPEP in the last year. Number of years in practice, age, and gender did not result in a significant difference in nPEP administration. Respondents noted time (27%), access to follow-up care (26%), cost to patients (23%), patients’ perceived interest in HIV counseling (15%), and concern for ongoing risky behaviors (9%) as barriers to prescribing nPEP (Figure 2). 64% (95/149) of respondents feel that it is their responsibility as an ED provider to refer patients at risk of nonoccupational exposures for risk-reduction counseling. CONCLUSION: This study identified an opportunity for HIV prevention in the emergency department. The majority of participants had not prescribed nPEP in the past 12 months. Although most were willing to prescribe nPEP and felt it was their responsibility, the majority of participants were not confident in prescribing it. Future interventions to increase the use of nPEP in the ED should target provider education, cost, access to follow-up care and counseling. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6809160/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1146 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Sherrerd-Smith, William O’Connell, Katie Gill, Shanedeep Kisteneff, Alice Derber, Catherine Salts, Laila Lo, Bruce 1283. Attitudes and Practices Regarding HIV Post-Exposure Prophylaxis |
title | 1283. Attitudes and Practices Regarding HIV Post-Exposure Prophylaxis |
title_full | 1283. Attitudes and Practices Regarding HIV Post-Exposure Prophylaxis |
title_fullStr | 1283. Attitudes and Practices Regarding HIV Post-Exposure Prophylaxis |
title_full_unstemmed | 1283. Attitudes and Practices Regarding HIV Post-Exposure Prophylaxis |
title_short | 1283. Attitudes and Practices Regarding HIV Post-Exposure Prophylaxis |
title_sort | 1283. attitudes and practices regarding hiv post-exposure prophylaxis |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6809160/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1146 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sherrerdsmithwilliam 1283attitudesandpracticesregardinghivpostexposureprophylaxis AT oconnellkatie 1283attitudesandpracticesregardinghivpostexposureprophylaxis AT gillshanedeep 1283attitudesandpracticesregardinghivpostexposureprophylaxis AT kisteneffalice 1283attitudesandpracticesregardinghivpostexposureprophylaxis AT derbercatherine 1283attitudesandpracticesregardinghivpostexposureprophylaxis AT saltslaila 1283attitudesandpracticesregardinghivpostexposureprophylaxis AT lobruce 1283attitudesandpracticesregardinghivpostexposureprophylaxis |