Cargando…

1793. Clinical Outcomes among Febrile Infants Before and After Implementation of BioFire® FilmArray® Panels

BACKGROUND: The clinical benefits of multiplex polymerase chain reaction panels are not well defined. We evaluated outcomes among infants before and after implementation of the BioFire® FilmArray® Respiratory Panel 2 (RP2) and Meningitis Encephalitis Panel (MEP). METHODS: This single-center study co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Crook, Jennifer, Xu, Meng, Slaughter, Chris, Browning, Whitney, Estrada, Cristina, Gay, James, Thomas, Gale, Quinn, Criziel, Benton, Alison, Schmitz, Jonathan, Banerjee, Ritu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6809166/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1656
_version_ 1783461918332157952
author Crook, Jennifer
Xu, Meng
Slaughter, Chris
Browning, Whitney
Estrada, Cristina
Gay, James
Thomas, Gale
Quinn, Criziel
Benton, Alison
Schmitz, Jonathan
Banerjee, Ritu
Banerjee, Ritu
author_facet Crook, Jennifer
Xu, Meng
Slaughter, Chris
Browning, Whitney
Estrada, Cristina
Gay, James
Thomas, Gale
Quinn, Criziel
Benton, Alison
Schmitz, Jonathan
Banerjee, Ritu
Banerjee, Ritu
author_sort Crook, Jennifer
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The clinical benefits of multiplex polymerase chain reaction panels are not well defined. We evaluated outcomes among infants before and after implementation of the BioFire® FilmArray® Respiratory Panel 2 (RP2) and Meningitis Encephalitis Panel (MEP). METHODS: This single-center study compared outcomes among infants ≤ 90 days presenting to the Emergency Department with fever (T ≥ 38.0°C) or hypothermia (T < 35.8°C) during 3 time periods. P1 (January 1, 2011–December 31, 2014) had batch testing using a Genmark Dx® respiratory viral panel (RVP) and no standardized clinical practice guideline (CPG); P2 (January 1, 2015–April 30, 2018) had the RVP and a CPG; and P3 (May 1, 2018–March 31, 2019) had on-demand RP2 and MEP testing and a CPG. Clinical data were collected from medical records. Statistical analyses were performed using Kruskal–Wallis and Pearson tests. RESULTS: There were 5195 total patients: 2514 in P1, 2082 in P2, 599 in P3. Groups did not differ in pathogens or antimicrobials used. Testing was faster and performed more commonly in P3 than P1 or P2 (P1, 10%; P2, 6.9%; P3, 71%; Table 1). From P1 to P3 there were significant decreases in length of stay (LOS), % receiving antimicrobials, antibiotic durations, ancillary test use, lumbar punctures (LPs), and chest X-rays (Table 1). In P3 compared with P2, infants more commonly received no antimicrobials (43.1% vs. 32.4%, P < 0.001; Figure 1), had fewer median (IQR) number of ancillary tests (5 (5–8) vs. 7 (3–10); P < 0.001), and shorter median (IQR) days of antibiotics (2.0 (1.0–2.7) vs. 2.4 (1.1–3.4); P < 0.001; Table 1). Among P3 infants, those with positive RP2 and/or MEP results were less likely to receive antimicrobials, be hospitalized or readmitted, had fewer ancillary tests and LPs, and shorter LOS and antibiotic durations than those with negative tests (Table 2). CONCLUSION: In this large pre-post intervention study among infants ≤ 90 days with fever or hypothermia, a clinical guideline plus rapid testing with RP2 and MEP was associated with less antimicrobial use and ancillary testing than a clinical guideline alone. Infants with positive RP2 and/or MEP results had fewer admissions, shorter LOS, and less antimicrobial and ancillary test use than those with negative tests. Rapid pathogen testing has benefit for infants. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: Ritu Banerjee, MD, PhD, Accelerate Diagnostics: Grant/Research Support; BioFire: Research Grant; Biomerieux: Research Grant; Roche: Research Grant.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6809166
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68091662019-10-28 1793. Clinical Outcomes among Febrile Infants Before and After Implementation of BioFire® FilmArray® Panels Crook, Jennifer Xu, Meng Slaughter, Chris Browning, Whitney Estrada, Cristina Gay, James Thomas, Gale Quinn, Criziel Benton, Alison Schmitz, Jonathan Banerjee, Ritu Banerjee, Ritu Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: The clinical benefits of multiplex polymerase chain reaction panels are not well defined. We evaluated outcomes among infants before and after implementation of the BioFire® FilmArray® Respiratory Panel 2 (RP2) and Meningitis Encephalitis Panel (MEP). METHODS: This single-center study compared outcomes among infants ≤ 90 days presenting to the Emergency Department with fever (T ≥ 38.0°C) or hypothermia (T < 35.8°C) during 3 time periods. P1 (January 1, 2011–December 31, 2014) had batch testing using a Genmark Dx® respiratory viral panel (RVP) and no standardized clinical practice guideline (CPG); P2 (January 1, 2015–April 30, 2018) had the RVP and a CPG; and P3 (May 1, 2018–March 31, 2019) had on-demand RP2 and MEP testing and a CPG. Clinical data were collected from medical records. Statistical analyses were performed using Kruskal–Wallis and Pearson tests. RESULTS: There were 5195 total patients: 2514 in P1, 2082 in P2, 599 in P3. Groups did not differ in pathogens or antimicrobials used. Testing was faster and performed more commonly in P3 than P1 or P2 (P1, 10%; P2, 6.9%; P3, 71%; Table 1). From P1 to P3 there were significant decreases in length of stay (LOS), % receiving antimicrobials, antibiotic durations, ancillary test use, lumbar punctures (LPs), and chest X-rays (Table 1). In P3 compared with P2, infants more commonly received no antimicrobials (43.1% vs. 32.4%, P < 0.001; Figure 1), had fewer median (IQR) number of ancillary tests (5 (5–8) vs. 7 (3–10); P < 0.001), and shorter median (IQR) days of antibiotics (2.0 (1.0–2.7) vs. 2.4 (1.1–3.4); P < 0.001; Table 1). Among P3 infants, those with positive RP2 and/or MEP results were less likely to receive antimicrobials, be hospitalized or readmitted, had fewer ancillary tests and LPs, and shorter LOS and antibiotic durations than those with negative tests (Table 2). CONCLUSION: In this large pre-post intervention study among infants ≤ 90 days with fever or hypothermia, a clinical guideline plus rapid testing with RP2 and MEP was associated with less antimicrobial use and ancillary testing than a clinical guideline alone. Infants with positive RP2 and/or MEP results had fewer admissions, shorter LOS, and less antimicrobial and ancillary test use than those with negative tests. Rapid pathogen testing has benefit for infants. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: Ritu Banerjee, MD, PhD, Accelerate Diagnostics: Grant/Research Support; BioFire: Research Grant; Biomerieux: Research Grant; Roche: Research Grant. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6809166/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1656 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Crook, Jennifer
Xu, Meng
Slaughter, Chris
Browning, Whitney
Estrada, Cristina
Gay, James
Thomas, Gale
Quinn, Criziel
Benton, Alison
Schmitz, Jonathan
Banerjee, Ritu
Banerjee, Ritu
1793. Clinical Outcomes among Febrile Infants Before and After Implementation of BioFire® FilmArray® Panels
title 1793. Clinical Outcomes among Febrile Infants Before and After Implementation of BioFire® FilmArray® Panels
title_full 1793. Clinical Outcomes among Febrile Infants Before and After Implementation of BioFire® FilmArray® Panels
title_fullStr 1793. Clinical Outcomes among Febrile Infants Before and After Implementation of BioFire® FilmArray® Panels
title_full_unstemmed 1793. Clinical Outcomes among Febrile Infants Before and After Implementation of BioFire® FilmArray® Panels
title_short 1793. Clinical Outcomes among Febrile Infants Before and After Implementation of BioFire® FilmArray® Panels
title_sort 1793. clinical outcomes among febrile infants before and after implementation of biofire® filmarray® panels
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6809166/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1656
work_keys_str_mv AT crookjennifer 1793clinicaloutcomesamongfebrileinfantsbeforeandafterimplementationofbiofirefilmarraypanels
AT xumeng 1793clinicaloutcomesamongfebrileinfantsbeforeandafterimplementationofbiofirefilmarraypanels
AT slaughterchris 1793clinicaloutcomesamongfebrileinfantsbeforeandafterimplementationofbiofirefilmarraypanels
AT browningwhitney 1793clinicaloutcomesamongfebrileinfantsbeforeandafterimplementationofbiofirefilmarraypanels
AT estradacristina 1793clinicaloutcomesamongfebrileinfantsbeforeandafterimplementationofbiofirefilmarraypanels
AT gayjames 1793clinicaloutcomesamongfebrileinfantsbeforeandafterimplementationofbiofirefilmarraypanels
AT thomasgale 1793clinicaloutcomesamongfebrileinfantsbeforeandafterimplementationofbiofirefilmarraypanels
AT quinncriziel 1793clinicaloutcomesamongfebrileinfantsbeforeandafterimplementationofbiofirefilmarraypanels
AT bentonalison 1793clinicaloutcomesamongfebrileinfantsbeforeandafterimplementationofbiofirefilmarraypanels
AT schmitzjonathan 1793clinicaloutcomesamongfebrileinfantsbeforeandafterimplementationofbiofirefilmarraypanels
AT banerjeeritu 1793clinicaloutcomesamongfebrileinfantsbeforeandafterimplementationofbiofirefilmarraypanels
AT banerjeeritu 1793clinicaloutcomesamongfebrileinfantsbeforeandafterimplementationofbiofirefilmarraypanels