Cargando…
2058. Patient Satisfaction Not Impacted by Antibiotic Prescribing for Viral Upper Respiratory Infections
BACKGROUND: Treating viral upper respiratory infections (URI) with antibiotics is a major contributor to the rise of antimicrobial resistance. Major drivers of unnecessary prescribing are a patient’s expectation to receive an antibiotic for acute illness and the physician’s desire to provide satisfa...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6809170/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1738 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: Treating viral upper respiratory infections (URI) with antibiotics is a major contributor to the rise of antimicrobial resistance. Major drivers of unnecessary prescribing are a patient’s expectation to receive an antibiotic for acute illness and the physician’s desire to provide satisfactory care. Our objective was to determine whether receiving an antibiotic prescription for a URI is associated with increased patient satisfaction. METHODS: We identified emergency department (ED) and ambulatory visit (AC) visits with an acute URI diagnosis code between September 2015 and May 2016 that had an associated patient satisfaction survey. The survey queried patients’ overall satisfaction (“Overall rating of care received during your visit”) using a Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (Very Poor) to 5 (Very Good). We assessed survey responses among patients receiving and not receiving antibiotics using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Results from ED and AC visits were compared separately. RESULTS: We collected survey responses from 282 ED patients and 1306 AC patients with acute URI. Compared with non-recipients, ED respondents receiving an antibiotic were more likely to be female (67% vs. 55%) and on Medicare (28% vs. 21%); AC respondents receiving a prescription were more likely to be female (68% vs. 61%) and have private insurance (63% vs. 53%). Overall satisfaction was very high (Median = 5, IQR 4–5 for both groups). Median responses did not differ by antibiotic prescription status in either group (rank-sum P = 0.4 and 0.8 for ED and AC respectively). When dichotomizing the overall satisfaction score, more patients receiving an antibiotic reported satisfaction of good to very good than those not receiving an antibiotic (84% vs. 76%; Pearson’s Χ(2)P = 0.1) among ED patients, but not AC patients (95% vs. 94%; P = 0.5). CONCLUSION: Patient satisfaction with their visit was not strongly associated with antibiotic receipt among ED and AC patients with URI in our study. This finding suggests that providers may limit the spread of antibiotic resistance by ceasing to unnecessarily prescribe antibiotics without jeopardizing patient satisfaction. Given low response rates to visit satisfaction surveys, further work is needed to verify the validity of this study and evaluate its generalizability. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. |
---|