Cargando…
1166. Infection Rate in Venous–Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VV-ECMO)
BACKGROUND: The Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) Infectious Disease Taskforce has identified infection rates as an area requiring further study. We aimed to evaluate our patients on venous–venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) for infection rates, organisms, and specifi...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6809187/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1029 |
_version_ | 1783461923729178624 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Joseph Christensen, Cason Merritt-Genore, Helenmari Siddique, Aleem Cawcutt, Kelly Cawcutt, Kelly |
author_facet | Wang, Joseph Christensen, Cason Merritt-Genore, Helenmari Siddique, Aleem Cawcutt, Kelly Cawcutt, Kelly |
author_sort | Wang, Joseph |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) Infectious Disease Taskforce has identified infection rates as an area requiring further study. We aimed to evaluate our patients on venous–venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) for infection rates, organisms, and specific factors that may alter infection risk. METHODS: Retrospective data were collected from September 2012 to 2015 for adult patients on VV ECMO. Demographic information as well as type and location of cannulation, antibiotics prior to and during cannulation, and presence of bacteremia were obtained. Counts and percentages are reported for categorical variables. RESULTS: 47 patients between 18 and 82 years of age with a median of age of 58 years were included. 76.6% (N = 36) were male. The average number of hospital days until cannulation was 7.8 days. 400 ECMO days were captured with a range of time on ECMO of 1–41 days. 46.8% (N = 22) of patients were alive at the time of discharge. 70.2% (N = 32) of cannulations were in the OR (Figure 1). 55% (N = 26) of patients had a Right Ventricular Assist Device (RVAD) with in-line oxygenator. 66% (N = 31) of all patients were on antibiotics prior to cannulation for other indications while 53% (N = 25) of all patients received perioperative antibiotics (Figure 2). 59% (N = 28) of all patients had blood cultures while on ECMO, with only 8% (N = 4) of all patients returning positive. Of the positive cultures, 2 were true bacteremia resulting in an infection rate of 5 per 1,000 ECMO days (Figure 3). One patient grew Escherichia coli while the other grew Escherichia coli and Streptococcus pneumoniae. Neither patient received antibiotics perioperatively or for other indications (Figure 4). Due to the low number of infected patients, further statistical analysis could not be performed. CONCLUSION: We report a low rate of bloodstream infection amongst our VV-ECMO patients. Further investigation to ascertain trends in infection rate with cannulation location/type as well as association with antibiotic is currently being pursued. Other avenues of research will include a comparison of infection rates between VV and Venous Arterial (VA) ECMO. Information from these investigations will help aid the development of guidelines to minimize the rate of nosocomial infections in ECMO patients. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6809187 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68091872019-10-28 1166. Infection Rate in Venous–Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VV-ECMO) Wang, Joseph Christensen, Cason Merritt-Genore, Helenmari Siddique, Aleem Cawcutt, Kelly Cawcutt, Kelly Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: The Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) Infectious Disease Taskforce has identified infection rates as an area requiring further study. We aimed to evaluate our patients on venous–venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) for infection rates, organisms, and specific factors that may alter infection risk. METHODS: Retrospective data were collected from September 2012 to 2015 for adult patients on VV ECMO. Demographic information as well as type and location of cannulation, antibiotics prior to and during cannulation, and presence of bacteremia were obtained. Counts and percentages are reported for categorical variables. RESULTS: 47 patients between 18 and 82 years of age with a median of age of 58 years were included. 76.6% (N = 36) were male. The average number of hospital days until cannulation was 7.8 days. 400 ECMO days were captured with a range of time on ECMO of 1–41 days. 46.8% (N = 22) of patients were alive at the time of discharge. 70.2% (N = 32) of cannulations were in the OR (Figure 1). 55% (N = 26) of patients had a Right Ventricular Assist Device (RVAD) with in-line oxygenator. 66% (N = 31) of all patients were on antibiotics prior to cannulation for other indications while 53% (N = 25) of all patients received perioperative antibiotics (Figure 2). 59% (N = 28) of all patients had blood cultures while on ECMO, with only 8% (N = 4) of all patients returning positive. Of the positive cultures, 2 were true bacteremia resulting in an infection rate of 5 per 1,000 ECMO days (Figure 3). One patient grew Escherichia coli while the other grew Escherichia coli and Streptococcus pneumoniae. Neither patient received antibiotics perioperatively or for other indications (Figure 4). Due to the low number of infected patients, further statistical analysis could not be performed. CONCLUSION: We report a low rate of bloodstream infection amongst our VV-ECMO patients. Further investigation to ascertain trends in infection rate with cannulation location/type as well as association with antibiotic is currently being pursued. Other avenues of research will include a comparison of infection rates between VV and Venous Arterial (VA) ECMO. Information from these investigations will help aid the development of guidelines to minimize the rate of nosocomial infections in ECMO patients. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6809187/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1029 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Wang, Joseph Christensen, Cason Merritt-Genore, Helenmari Siddique, Aleem Cawcutt, Kelly Cawcutt, Kelly 1166. Infection Rate in Venous–Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VV-ECMO) |
title | 1166. Infection Rate in Venous–Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VV-ECMO) |
title_full | 1166. Infection Rate in Venous–Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VV-ECMO) |
title_fullStr | 1166. Infection Rate in Venous–Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VV-ECMO) |
title_full_unstemmed | 1166. Infection Rate in Venous–Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VV-ECMO) |
title_short | 1166. Infection Rate in Venous–Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VV-ECMO) |
title_sort | 1166. infection rate in venous–venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (vv-ecmo) |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6809187/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1029 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangjoseph 1166infectionrateinvenousvenousextracorporealmembraneoxygenationvvecmo AT christensencason 1166infectionrateinvenousvenousextracorporealmembraneoxygenationvvecmo AT merrittgenorehelenmari 1166infectionrateinvenousvenousextracorporealmembraneoxygenationvvecmo AT siddiquealeem 1166infectionrateinvenousvenousextracorporealmembraneoxygenationvvecmo AT cawcuttkelly 1166infectionrateinvenousvenousextracorporealmembraneoxygenationvvecmo AT cawcuttkelly 1166infectionrateinvenousvenousextracorporealmembraneoxygenationvvecmo |