Cargando…
2894. Metrics of Antimicrobial Use Within Inpatient Settings: Impacts of Statistical Methods and Case-Mix Adjustments
BACKGROUND: The necessary data elements and optimal statistical methods for benchmarking hospital-level antimicrobial use are still being debated. We aimed to describe the relative influence of case-mix adjustment and different statistical methods when ranking hospitals on antimicrobial use (AU) wit...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6809196/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz359.172 |
_version_ | 1783461925993054208 |
---|---|
author | Goto, Michihiko Nair, Rajeshwari Alexander, Bruce Beck, Brice Richards, Christopher Perencevich, Eli N Livorsi, Daniel J |
author_facet | Goto, Michihiko Nair, Rajeshwari Alexander, Bruce Beck, Brice Richards, Christopher Perencevich, Eli N Livorsi, Daniel J |
author_sort | Goto, Michihiko |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The necessary data elements and optimal statistical methods for benchmarking hospital-level antimicrobial use are still being debated. We aimed to describe the relative influence of case-mix adjustment and different statistical methods when ranking hospitals on antimicrobial use (AU) within inpatient settings. METHODS: Using administrative data from the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) system in October 2016, we calculated total antimicrobial days of therapy (DOT) and days present according to the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) protocol. Patient-level demographics, comorbidities, and recent procedures were used for case-mix adjustments. We compared hospital rankings across 4 different methods: (A) crude antimicrobial DOT per 1,000 days present, aggregated at the hospital-level; (B) observed/expected (O/E) AU ratio with risk adjustment for ward-level variables (analogous to NHSN’s Standardized Antimicrobial Administration Ratio); (C) O/E AU ratio with risk adjustment for ward-/patient-level variables; (D) predicted/expected (P/E) AU ratio with risk adjustment for ward-/patient-level variables, based on a multilevel model accounting for clustering effects at hospital- and ward-levels. RESULTS: The cohort included 165,949 DOTs and 318,321 days present at 122 acute care hospitals within VHA. Crude DOTs per 1,000 days present ranged from 153.6 to 900.8 (Figure A), and ward-level risk adjustment only modestly changed rankings (Figure B). When adjusted for ward- and patient-level variables (including demographics, 14 comorbidities and 22 procedures), rankings changed substantially (Figure C). Risk-adjustment by a multilevel model changed rankings even further, while shrinking variabilities (Figure D). Ten hospitals in the lowest and 11 hospitals in the highest quartiles by O/E risk adjustment for only ward-level variables were classified to different quartiles on P/E risk adjustment. CONCLUSION: We observed that the selection of variables and statistical methods for case-mix adjustment had a substantial impact on hospital rankings for antimicrobial use within inpatient settings. Careful consideration of methodologies is warranted when providing benchmarking metrics for hospitals. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported Disclosures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6809196 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68091962019-10-28 2894. Metrics of Antimicrobial Use Within Inpatient Settings: Impacts of Statistical Methods and Case-Mix Adjustments Goto, Michihiko Nair, Rajeshwari Alexander, Bruce Beck, Brice Richards, Christopher Perencevich, Eli N Livorsi, Daniel J Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: The necessary data elements and optimal statistical methods for benchmarking hospital-level antimicrobial use are still being debated. We aimed to describe the relative influence of case-mix adjustment and different statistical methods when ranking hospitals on antimicrobial use (AU) within inpatient settings. METHODS: Using administrative data from the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) system in October 2016, we calculated total antimicrobial days of therapy (DOT) and days present according to the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) protocol. Patient-level demographics, comorbidities, and recent procedures were used for case-mix adjustments. We compared hospital rankings across 4 different methods: (A) crude antimicrobial DOT per 1,000 days present, aggregated at the hospital-level; (B) observed/expected (O/E) AU ratio with risk adjustment for ward-level variables (analogous to NHSN’s Standardized Antimicrobial Administration Ratio); (C) O/E AU ratio with risk adjustment for ward-/patient-level variables; (D) predicted/expected (P/E) AU ratio with risk adjustment for ward-/patient-level variables, based on a multilevel model accounting for clustering effects at hospital- and ward-levels. RESULTS: The cohort included 165,949 DOTs and 318,321 days present at 122 acute care hospitals within VHA. Crude DOTs per 1,000 days present ranged from 153.6 to 900.8 (Figure A), and ward-level risk adjustment only modestly changed rankings (Figure B). When adjusted for ward- and patient-level variables (including demographics, 14 comorbidities and 22 procedures), rankings changed substantially (Figure C). Risk-adjustment by a multilevel model changed rankings even further, while shrinking variabilities (Figure D). Ten hospitals in the lowest and 11 hospitals in the highest quartiles by O/E risk adjustment for only ward-level variables were classified to different quartiles on P/E risk adjustment. CONCLUSION: We observed that the selection of variables and statistical methods for case-mix adjustment had a substantial impact on hospital rankings for antimicrobial use within inpatient settings. Careful consideration of methodologies is warranted when providing benchmarking metrics for hospitals. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported Disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6809196/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz359.172 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Goto, Michihiko Nair, Rajeshwari Alexander, Bruce Beck, Brice Richards, Christopher Perencevich, Eli N Livorsi, Daniel J 2894. Metrics of Antimicrobial Use Within Inpatient Settings: Impacts of Statistical Methods and Case-Mix Adjustments |
title | 2894. Metrics of Antimicrobial Use Within Inpatient Settings: Impacts of Statistical Methods and Case-Mix Adjustments |
title_full | 2894. Metrics of Antimicrobial Use Within Inpatient Settings: Impacts of Statistical Methods and Case-Mix Adjustments |
title_fullStr | 2894. Metrics of Antimicrobial Use Within Inpatient Settings: Impacts of Statistical Methods and Case-Mix Adjustments |
title_full_unstemmed | 2894. Metrics of Antimicrobial Use Within Inpatient Settings: Impacts of Statistical Methods and Case-Mix Adjustments |
title_short | 2894. Metrics of Antimicrobial Use Within Inpatient Settings: Impacts of Statistical Methods and Case-Mix Adjustments |
title_sort | 2894. metrics of antimicrobial use within inpatient settings: impacts of statistical methods and case-mix adjustments |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6809196/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz359.172 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gotomichihiko 2894metricsofantimicrobialusewithininpatientsettingsimpactsofstatisticalmethodsandcasemixadjustments AT nairrajeshwari 2894metricsofantimicrobialusewithininpatientsettingsimpactsofstatisticalmethodsandcasemixadjustments AT alexanderbruce 2894metricsofantimicrobialusewithininpatientsettingsimpactsofstatisticalmethodsandcasemixadjustments AT beckbrice 2894metricsofantimicrobialusewithininpatientsettingsimpactsofstatisticalmethodsandcasemixadjustments AT richardschristopher 2894metricsofantimicrobialusewithininpatientsettingsimpactsofstatisticalmethodsandcasemixadjustments AT perencevichelin 2894metricsofantimicrobialusewithininpatientsettingsimpactsofstatisticalmethodsandcasemixadjustments AT livorsidanielj 2894metricsofantimicrobialusewithininpatientsettingsimpactsofstatisticalmethodsandcasemixadjustments |