Cargando…

1428. Comparing Outcomes of Diabetic Foot Infections Requiring Amputation, Negative vs. Positive Margins

BACKGROUND: This was a retrospective, observational cohort study of patients with diabetes and lower extremity osteomyelitis requiring amputation. Patients were categorized as having negative margins (without residual osteomyelitis or with joint disarticulation), or positive margins (with residual o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dixon, Michael K, Cadena, Jose, Walter, Elizabeth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6809205/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1292
_version_ 1783461928285241344
author Dixon, Michael K
Cadena, Jose
Walter, Elizabeth
author_facet Dixon, Michael K
Cadena, Jose
Walter, Elizabeth
author_sort Dixon, Michael K
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This was a retrospective, observational cohort study of patients with diabetes and lower extremity osteomyelitis requiring amputation. Patients were categorized as having negative margins (without residual osteomyelitis or with joint disarticulation), or positive margins (with residual osteomyelitis). Health outcomes were compared between groups. The primary outcomes were relapse of infection at one year and reintervention at one year. Secondary outcomes include mortality at 30 days, 90 days, and 1 year; treatment failure at one year; and a composite of relapse of infection at one year, reintervention at 1 year, and death at 1 year. METHODS: CPRS ICD-10 codes were reviewed from patients at Audie L. Murphy VA with amputation for osteomyelitis between July 2, 2015 and July 13, 2017. Pathology reports were reviewed for the presence or absence of residual osteomyelitis, and outcomes were determined by chart review. Patient characteristics were recorded, such as age, serum albumin, presence of diabetes, hemoglobin A1c, organism on culture, peripheral vascular disease, and occurrence of a peripheral vascular intervention. RESULTS: The ALMVA is a 500-bed medical center with an active BMT program. Clinical data from 146 patients were obtained and analyzed. There were no significant differences in primary or secondary outcomes relative to patients with positive margins or negative margins. A lack of consistency in margin reporting by Pathology was seen. Albumin level and number of patients with residual osteomyelitis were significantly different between the two groups (table). CONCLUSION: There were no significant differences in outcomes between amputations with positive margins and those with negative margins. Based on current IDSA guidelines, treatment varies significantly for patients with positive or negative margins, with the former requiring 6 weeks of parenteral antibiotic therapy. Extended courses of parenteral antibiotics increase risk for treatment-associated morbidity, and more evidence is needed to support these recommended durations. A quality improvement project is underway with the ID, Podiatry and Pathology departments to resolve issues related to obtaining and processing surgical samples, as well as interpreting and reporting margin results. [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6809205
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68092052019-10-28 1428. Comparing Outcomes of Diabetic Foot Infections Requiring Amputation, Negative vs. Positive Margins Dixon, Michael K Cadena, Jose Walter, Elizabeth Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: This was a retrospective, observational cohort study of patients with diabetes and lower extremity osteomyelitis requiring amputation. Patients were categorized as having negative margins (without residual osteomyelitis or with joint disarticulation), or positive margins (with residual osteomyelitis). Health outcomes were compared between groups. The primary outcomes were relapse of infection at one year and reintervention at one year. Secondary outcomes include mortality at 30 days, 90 days, and 1 year; treatment failure at one year; and a composite of relapse of infection at one year, reintervention at 1 year, and death at 1 year. METHODS: CPRS ICD-10 codes were reviewed from patients at Audie L. Murphy VA with amputation for osteomyelitis between July 2, 2015 and July 13, 2017. Pathology reports were reviewed for the presence or absence of residual osteomyelitis, and outcomes were determined by chart review. Patient characteristics were recorded, such as age, serum albumin, presence of diabetes, hemoglobin A1c, organism on culture, peripheral vascular disease, and occurrence of a peripheral vascular intervention. RESULTS: The ALMVA is a 500-bed medical center with an active BMT program. Clinical data from 146 patients were obtained and analyzed. There were no significant differences in primary or secondary outcomes relative to patients with positive margins or negative margins. A lack of consistency in margin reporting by Pathology was seen. Albumin level and number of patients with residual osteomyelitis were significantly different between the two groups (table). CONCLUSION: There were no significant differences in outcomes between amputations with positive margins and those with negative margins. Based on current IDSA guidelines, treatment varies significantly for patients with positive or negative margins, with the former requiring 6 weeks of parenteral antibiotic therapy. Extended courses of parenteral antibiotics increase risk for treatment-associated morbidity, and more evidence is needed to support these recommended durations. A quality improvement project is underway with the ID, Podiatry and Pathology departments to resolve issues related to obtaining and processing surgical samples, as well as interpreting and reporting margin results. [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6809205/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1292 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Dixon, Michael K
Cadena, Jose
Walter, Elizabeth
1428. Comparing Outcomes of Diabetic Foot Infections Requiring Amputation, Negative vs. Positive Margins
title 1428. Comparing Outcomes of Diabetic Foot Infections Requiring Amputation, Negative vs. Positive Margins
title_full 1428. Comparing Outcomes of Diabetic Foot Infections Requiring Amputation, Negative vs. Positive Margins
title_fullStr 1428. Comparing Outcomes of Diabetic Foot Infections Requiring Amputation, Negative vs. Positive Margins
title_full_unstemmed 1428. Comparing Outcomes of Diabetic Foot Infections Requiring Amputation, Negative vs. Positive Margins
title_short 1428. Comparing Outcomes of Diabetic Foot Infections Requiring Amputation, Negative vs. Positive Margins
title_sort 1428. comparing outcomes of diabetic foot infections requiring amputation, negative vs. positive margins
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6809205/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1292
work_keys_str_mv AT dixonmichaelk 1428comparingoutcomesofdiabeticfootinfectionsrequiringamputationnegativevspositivemargins
AT cadenajose 1428comparingoutcomesofdiabeticfootinfectionsrequiringamputationnegativevspositivemargins
AT walterelizabeth 1428comparingoutcomesofdiabeticfootinfectionsrequiringamputationnegativevspositivemargins