Cargando…
902. A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of a Single Immunization of Ad26.RSV.preF against RSV Infection in a Viral Challenge Model in Healthy Adults
BACKGROUND: Despite the high disease burden of RSV in older adults and children, there is currently no approved vaccine. Ad26.RSV.preF, an experimental RSV vaccine, has demonstrated immunogenicity and tolerability in first-in-human clinical studies. The aim of this study was to assess the potential...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6809212/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz359.061 |
_version_ | 1783461929980788736 |
---|---|
author | DeVincenzo, John Gymnopoulou, Efi De Paepe, Els Murray, Bryan Rosemary Bastian, Arangassery Haazen, Wouter Noulin, Nicolas Comeaux, Christy Heijnen, Esther Eze, Kinglsey Gilbert, Anthony Lambkin-Williams, Rob Schuitemaker, Hanneke Callendret, Benoit Sadoff, Jerald |
author_facet | DeVincenzo, John Gymnopoulou, Efi De Paepe, Els Murray, Bryan Rosemary Bastian, Arangassery Haazen, Wouter Noulin, Nicolas Comeaux, Christy Heijnen, Esther Eze, Kinglsey Gilbert, Anthony Lambkin-Williams, Rob Schuitemaker, Hanneke Callendret, Benoit Sadoff, Jerald |
author_sort | DeVincenzo, John |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Despite the high disease burden of RSV in older adults and children, there is currently no approved vaccine. Ad26.RSV.preF, an experimental RSV vaccine, has demonstrated immunogenicity and tolerability in first-in-human clinical studies. The aim of this study was to assess the potential of the Ad26.RSV.preF vaccine to protect against RSV infection and disease in an established RSV human challenge model, used for the first time to evaluate a vaccine. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, human challenge study (NCT03334695). Healthy adults received 1 × 10(11) vp Ad26.RSV.preF vaccine (active) or placebo (pbo) intramuscularly. After 28 days, volunteers were challenged intranasally with a low-passage clinical strain of RSV-A (0.8 mL of Memphis 37b) and then quarantined for 12 days. Nasal washes were collected twice daily throughout quarantine, starting 2 days post-challenge (viral load [VL] by qRT-PCR and quantitative cultures). Disease severity was recorded thrice daily using symptom diary cards. RESULTS: Fifty-three volunteers (active, n = 27; pbo, n = 26) were challenged with RSV-A. Quantitative viral assessments were consistently lower in active than pbo. The primary endpoint of the study was met: the area under the curve (AUC) for RSV VL over time (via qRT-PCR) was significantly lower in active pbo (P = 0.012). Median peak VL was lower for active (0 log(10) copies/mL) than pbo (5.4 log(10) copies/mL). Median AUC for RSV VL over time (quantitative culture) was lower for active than pbo (0 vs. 109, P = 0.002). Disease severity was lower for active than pbo, with a median AUC total symptom score of 35 (active) vs. 167 (pbo) (P = 0.002). Overall, RSV infection (defined by qRT-PCR alone or combined with symptoms) and disease severity over time were lower in active vs. pbo. CONCLUSION: RSV infections, VL, and RSV disease severity were consistently lower in healthy adults receiving Ad26.RSV.preF vs. placebo, demonstrating promising protection from RSV infection and disease. This was the first time that antiviral prevention was observed against RSV after active immunization. Ad26.RSV.preF warrants further evaluation in field trials for efficacy against natural RSV infections in populations considered at risk of severe RSV disease. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported Disclosures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6809212 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68092122019-10-28 902. A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of a Single Immunization of Ad26.RSV.preF against RSV Infection in a Viral Challenge Model in Healthy Adults DeVincenzo, John Gymnopoulou, Efi De Paepe, Els Murray, Bryan Rosemary Bastian, Arangassery Haazen, Wouter Noulin, Nicolas Comeaux, Christy Heijnen, Esther Eze, Kinglsey Gilbert, Anthony Lambkin-Williams, Rob Schuitemaker, Hanneke Callendret, Benoit Sadoff, Jerald Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Despite the high disease burden of RSV in older adults and children, there is currently no approved vaccine. Ad26.RSV.preF, an experimental RSV vaccine, has demonstrated immunogenicity and tolerability in first-in-human clinical studies. The aim of this study was to assess the potential of the Ad26.RSV.preF vaccine to protect against RSV infection and disease in an established RSV human challenge model, used for the first time to evaluate a vaccine. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, human challenge study (NCT03334695). Healthy adults received 1 × 10(11) vp Ad26.RSV.preF vaccine (active) or placebo (pbo) intramuscularly. After 28 days, volunteers were challenged intranasally with a low-passage clinical strain of RSV-A (0.8 mL of Memphis 37b) and then quarantined for 12 days. Nasal washes were collected twice daily throughout quarantine, starting 2 days post-challenge (viral load [VL] by qRT-PCR and quantitative cultures). Disease severity was recorded thrice daily using symptom diary cards. RESULTS: Fifty-three volunteers (active, n = 27; pbo, n = 26) were challenged with RSV-A. Quantitative viral assessments were consistently lower in active than pbo. The primary endpoint of the study was met: the area under the curve (AUC) for RSV VL over time (via qRT-PCR) was significantly lower in active pbo (P = 0.012). Median peak VL was lower for active (0 log(10) copies/mL) than pbo (5.4 log(10) copies/mL). Median AUC for RSV VL over time (quantitative culture) was lower for active than pbo (0 vs. 109, P = 0.002). Disease severity was lower for active than pbo, with a median AUC total symptom score of 35 (active) vs. 167 (pbo) (P = 0.002). Overall, RSV infection (defined by qRT-PCR alone or combined with symptoms) and disease severity over time were lower in active vs. pbo. CONCLUSION: RSV infections, VL, and RSV disease severity were consistently lower in healthy adults receiving Ad26.RSV.preF vs. placebo, demonstrating promising protection from RSV infection and disease. This was the first time that antiviral prevention was observed against RSV after active immunization. Ad26.RSV.preF warrants further evaluation in field trials for efficacy against natural RSV infections in populations considered at risk of severe RSV disease. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported Disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6809212/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz359.061 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Abstracts DeVincenzo, John Gymnopoulou, Efi De Paepe, Els Murray, Bryan Rosemary Bastian, Arangassery Haazen, Wouter Noulin, Nicolas Comeaux, Christy Heijnen, Esther Eze, Kinglsey Gilbert, Anthony Lambkin-Williams, Rob Schuitemaker, Hanneke Callendret, Benoit Sadoff, Jerald 902. A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of a Single Immunization of Ad26.RSV.preF against RSV Infection in a Viral Challenge Model in Healthy Adults |
title | 902. A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of a Single Immunization of Ad26.RSV.preF against RSV Infection in a Viral Challenge Model in Healthy Adults |
title_full | 902. A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of a Single Immunization of Ad26.RSV.preF against RSV Infection in a Viral Challenge Model in Healthy Adults |
title_fullStr | 902. A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of a Single Immunization of Ad26.RSV.preF against RSV Infection in a Viral Challenge Model in Healthy Adults |
title_full_unstemmed | 902. A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of a Single Immunization of Ad26.RSV.preF against RSV Infection in a Viral Challenge Model in Healthy Adults |
title_short | 902. A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of a Single Immunization of Ad26.RSV.preF against RSV Infection in a Viral Challenge Model in Healthy Adults |
title_sort | 902. a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy of a single immunization of ad26.rsv.pref against rsv infection in a viral challenge model in healthy adults |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6809212/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz359.061 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT devincenzojohn 902arandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledstudytoevaluatetheefficacyofasingleimmunizationofad26rsvprefagainstrsvinfectioninaviralchallengemodelinhealthyadults AT gymnopoulouefi 902arandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledstudytoevaluatetheefficacyofasingleimmunizationofad26rsvprefagainstrsvinfectioninaviralchallengemodelinhealthyadults AT depaepeels 902arandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledstudytoevaluatetheefficacyofasingleimmunizationofad26rsvprefagainstrsvinfectioninaviralchallengemodelinhealthyadults AT murraybryan 902arandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledstudytoevaluatetheefficacyofasingleimmunizationofad26rsvprefagainstrsvinfectioninaviralchallengemodelinhealthyadults AT rosemarybastianarangassery 902arandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledstudytoevaluatetheefficacyofasingleimmunizationofad26rsvprefagainstrsvinfectioninaviralchallengemodelinhealthyadults AT haazenwouter 902arandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledstudytoevaluatetheefficacyofasingleimmunizationofad26rsvprefagainstrsvinfectioninaviralchallengemodelinhealthyadults AT noulinnicolas 902arandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledstudytoevaluatetheefficacyofasingleimmunizationofad26rsvprefagainstrsvinfectioninaviralchallengemodelinhealthyadults AT comeauxchristy 902arandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledstudytoevaluatetheefficacyofasingleimmunizationofad26rsvprefagainstrsvinfectioninaviralchallengemodelinhealthyadults AT heijnenesther 902arandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledstudytoevaluatetheefficacyofasingleimmunizationofad26rsvprefagainstrsvinfectioninaviralchallengemodelinhealthyadults AT ezekinglsey 902arandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledstudytoevaluatetheefficacyofasingleimmunizationofad26rsvprefagainstrsvinfectioninaviralchallengemodelinhealthyadults AT gilbertanthony 902arandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledstudytoevaluatetheefficacyofasingleimmunizationofad26rsvprefagainstrsvinfectioninaviralchallengemodelinhealthyadults AT lambkinwilliamsrob 902arandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledstudytoevaluatetheefficacyofasingleimmunizationofad26rsvprefagainstrsvinfectioninaviralchallengemodelinhealthyadults AT schuitemakerhanneke 902arandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledstudytoevaluatetheefficacyofasingleimmunizationofad26rsvprefagainstrsvinfectioninaviralchallengemodelinhealthyadults AT callendretbenoit 902arandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledstudytoevaluatetheefficacyofasingleimmunizationofad26rsvprefagainstrsvinfectioninaviralchallengemodelinhealthyadults AT sadoffjerald 902arandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledstudytoevaluatetheefficacyofasingleimmunizationofad26rsvprefagainstrsvinfectioninaviralchallengemodelinhealthyadults |