Cargando…

1222. Are Reduced Concentrations of Chlorine-Based Disinfectants Effective Against Candida auris?

BACKGROUND: Currently, sporicidal disinfectants such as bleach are recommended for daily and terminal disinfection of the rooms of patients with Candida auris colonization and/or infection. However, bleach and other chlorine-based disinfectants can have adverse effects on surfaces and personnel. Dis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kumar, Jessica, Cadnum, Jennifer, Ng Wong, Y Karen, Sankar Chittoor Mana, Thriveen, Alhmidi, Heba, Donskey, Curtis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6809222/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1085
_version_ 1783461932462768128
author Kumar, Jessica
Cadnum, Jennifer
Ng Wong, Y Karen
Sankar Chittoor Mana, Thriveen
Alhmidi, Heba
Donskey, Curtis
author_facet Kumar, Jessica
Cadnum, Jennifer
Ng Wong, Y Karen
Sankar Chittoor Mana, Thriveen
Alhmidi, Heba
Donskey, Curtis
author_sort Kumar, Jessica
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Currently, sporicidal disinfectants such as bleach are recommended for daily and terminal disinfection of the rooms of patients with Candida auris colonization and/or infection. However, bleach and other chlorine-based disinfectants can have adverse effects on surfaces and personnel. Disinfectant solutions with reduced chlorine concentrations are commonly used for other pathogens, but it is not known if diluted or alternative products maintain efficacy against C. auris both in vitro and in vivo. METHODS: We tested the efficacy of different concentrations of a sodium dichloroisocyanurate (NaDCC) product and sodium hypochlorite using the method recommended by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for evaluation of the efficacy of liquid disinfectants against C. auris (EPA MLB SOP MB-35-00) and in a simulated patient room. Carriers were exposed to each disinfectant for 1 and 2 minutes. Log reductions were calculated by subtracting viable organisms recovered after disinfectant exposure vs. deionized water controls. RESULTS: As shown in the figure, the NaDCC product at 4306 ppm tested with a 2 minute contact time reduced C. auris by ≥5 log(10) colony-forming units (CFU) but had reduced efficacy with shorter exposure time or lower concentrations. Sodium hypochlorite was effective with 1 or 2 minute exposure times at a concentration of 6,500 ppm, and was effective at 4,000 ppm with an exposure time of 2 minutes. In the simulated patient room, NaDCC reduced C. auris contamination by ≥6 log(10) CFUs on all surfaces. CONCLUSION: A chlorine-based NaDCC product was effective at reducing C. auris. Both NaDCC and sodium hypochlorite products exhibited reduced efficacy at lower concentrations, particularly at concentrations below 4000 ppm. The NaDCC products were also effective in reducing contamination in the simulated patient room. UV-C treatment was an effective adjunct to manual cleaning. [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6809222
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68092222019-10-28 1222. Are Reduced Concentrations of Chlorine-Based Disinfectants Effective Against Candida auris? Kumar, Jessica Cadnum, Jennifer Ng Wong, Y Karen Sankar Chittoor Mana, Thriveen Alhmidi, Heba Donskey, Curtis Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Currently, sporicidal disinfectants such as bleach are recommended for daily and terminal disinfection of the rooms of patients with Candida auris colonization and/or infection. However, bleach and other chlorine-based disinfectants can have adverse effects on surfaces and personnel. Disinfectant solutions with reduced chlorine concentrations are commonly used for other pathogens, but it is not known if diluted or alternative products maintain efficacy against C. auris both in vitro and in vivo. METHODS: We tested the efficacy of different concentrations of a sodium dichloroisocyanurate (NaDCC) product and sodium hypochlorite using the method recommended by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for evaluation of the efficacy of liquid disinfectants against C. auris (EPA MLB SOP MB-35-00) and in a simulated patient room. Carriers were exposed to each disinfectant for 1 and 2 minutes. Log reductions were calculated by subtracting viable organisms recovered after disinfectant exposure vs. deionized water controls. RESULTS: As shown in the figure, the NaDCC product at 4306 ppm tested with a 2 minute contact time reduced C. auris by ≥5 log(10) colony-forming units (CFU) but had reduced efficacy with shorter exposure time or lower concentrations. Sodium hypochlorite was effective with 1 or 2 minute exposure times at a concentration of 6,500 ppm, and was effective at 4,000 ppm with an exposure time of 2 minutes. In the simulated patient room, NaDCC reduced C. auris contamination by ≥6 log(10) CFUs on all surfaces. CONCLUSION: A chlorine-based NaDCC product was effective at reducing C. auris. Both NaDCC and sodium hypochlorite products exhibited reduced efficacy at lower concentrations, particularly at concentrations below 4000 ppm. The NaDCC products were also effective in reducing contamination in the simulated patient room. UV-C treatment was an effective adjunct to manual cleaning. [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6809222/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1085 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Kumar, Jessica
Cadnum, Jennifer
Ng Wong, Y Karen
Sankar Chittoor Mana, Thriveen
Alhmidi, Heba
Donskey, Curtis
1222. Are Reduced Concentrations of Chlorine-Based Disinfectants Effective Against Candida auris?
title 1222. Are Reduced Concentrations of Chlorine-Based Disinfectants Effective Against Candida auris?
title_full 1222. Are Reduced Concentrations of Chlorine-Based Disinfectants Effective Against Candida auris?
title_fullStr 1222. Are Reduced Concentrations of Chlorine-Based Disinfectants Effective Against Candida auris?
title_full_unstemmed 1222. Are Reduced Concentrations of Chlorine-Based Disinfectants Effective Against Candida auris?
title_short 1222. Are Reduced Concentrations of Chlorine-Based Disinfectants Effective Against Candida auris?
title_sort 1222. are reduced concentrations of chlorine-based disinfectants effective against candida auris?
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6809222/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1085
work_keys_str_mv AT kumarjessica 1222arereducedconcentrationsofchlorinebaseddisinfectantseffectiveagainstcandidaauris
AT cadnumjennifer 1222arereducedconcentrationsofchlorinebaseddisinfectantseffectiveagainstcandidaauris
AT ngwongykaren 1222arereducedconcentrationsofchlorinebaseddisinfectantseffectiveagainstcandidaauris
AT sankarchittoormanathriveen 1222arereducedconcentrationsofchlorinebaseddisinfectantseffectiveagainstcandidaauris
AT alhmidiheba 1222arereducedconcentrationsofchlorinebaseddisinfectantseffectiveagainstcandidaauris
AT donskeycurtis 1222arereducedconcentrationsofchlorinebaseddisinfectantseffectiveagainstcandidaauris