Cargando…

2013. Blood Culture Contamination in the Emergency Department: A Risk Factor Analysis

BACKGROUND: Blood cultures (BCx) guide treatment for hospitalized patients, yet contaminated BCx lead to clinical uncertainty, impacting care. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) recommends contamination rates should be <3%, yet our Emergency Department (ED) rate is consistentl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Klucher, Justin, Lakkad, Mrinmayee, Painter, Jacob, Dare, Ryan K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6809269/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1693
_version_ 1783461944686018560
author Klucher, Justin
Lakkad, Mrinmayee
Painter, Jacob
Dare, Ryan K
author_facet Klucher, Justin
Lakkad, Mrinmayee
Painter, Jacob
Dare, Ryan K
author_sort Klucher, Justin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Blood cultures (BCx) guide treatment for hospitalized patients, yet contaminated BCx lead to clinical uncertainty, impacting care. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) recommends contamination rates should be <3%, yet our Emergency Department (ED) rate is consistently above this benchmark. Reasons for this are unclear, thus it is imperative to investigate potential risk factors for BCx contamination. METHODS: We performed a retrospective case–control risk factor analysis of patients with BCx collected in our ED between 2014 and 2018. Contaminated BCx were identified by the microbiology laboratory per American Society of Microbiology recommendations. Demographics, comorbidities, and clinical characteristics were evaluated in patients with false-positive/contaminated BCx (cases) and patients with negative BCx (controls). Potential risk factors identified in univariate analysis were included in a logistic regression model. Unadjusted and adjusted analyses were performed using SAS 9.4. RESULTS: 25,668 BCx from 13,782 patients were included in analysis. 20,907 BCx from 11,266 (82%) patients were negative, 2,856 BCx from 1,504 (11%) patients were true positives, and 1,905 BCx from 1,012 (7%) patients were contaminated. Yearly ED contamination rates ranged from 5.0–9.3%. Collector contamination rates varied, though 38 (19%), 75 (35%), and 7 (3%) of 209 collectors had a contamination rate <3%, ≥ 10%, and ≥ 20%, respectively. Significant patient-specific risk factors identified in univariate analysis are listed in the attached table along with adjusted analysis. CONCLUSION: In our analysis, we identified that older age, African American race, higher BMI, COPD, paralysis, and presenting in septic shock independently increases risk of having a contaminated BCx. Difficulty obtaining venipuncture in patients with these risk factors, often requiring multiple collection attempts, likely leads to decreased sterile technique. It is imperative to have a process assuring sterile technique in these high-risk individuals to minimize consequences associated with having a false-positive BCx result in these high-risk patients. Additionally, variable collector contamination rates seen in this study highlight the necessity for frequent technique in-service training. [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6809269
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68092692019-10-28 2013. Blood Culture Contamination in the Emergency Department: A Risk Factor Analysis Klucher, Justin Lakkad, Mrinmayee Painter, Jacob Dare, Ryan K Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Blood cultures (BCx) guide treatment for hospitalized patients, yet contaminated BCx lead to clinical uncertainty, impacting care. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) recommends contamination rates should be <3%, yet our Emergency Department (ED) rate is consistently above this benchmark. Reasons for this are unclear, thus it is imperative to investigate potential risk factors for BCx contamination. METHODS: We performed a retrospective case–control risk factor analysis of patients with BCx collected in our ED between 2014 and 2018. Contaminated BCx were identified by the microbiology laboratory per American Society of Microbiology recommendations. Demographics, comorbidities, and clinical characteristics were evaluated in patients with false-positive/contaminated BCx (cases) and patients with negative BCx (controls). Potential risk factors identified in univariate analysis were included in a logistic regression model. Unadjusted and adjusted analyses were performed using SAS 9.4. RESULTS: 25,668 BCx from 13,782 patients were included in analysis. 20,907 BCx from 11,266 (82%) patients were negative, 2,856 BCx from 1,504 (11%) patients were true positives, and 1,905 BCx from 1,012 (7%) patients were contaminated. Yearly ED contamination rates ranged from 5.0–9.3%. Collector contamination rates varied, though 38 (19%), 75 (35%), and 7 (3%) of 209 collectors had a contamination rate <3%, ≥ 10%, and ≥ 20%, respectively. Significant patient-specific risk factors identified in univariate analysis are listed in the attached table along with adjusted analysis. CONCLUSION: In our analysis, we identified that older age, African American race, higher BMI, COPD, paralysis, and presenting in septic shock independently increases risk of having a contaminated BCx. Difficulty obtaining venipuncture in patients with these risk factors, often requiring multiple collection attempts, likely leads to decreased sterile technique. It is imperative to have a process assuring sterile technique in these high-risk individuals to minimize consequences associated with having a false-positive BCx result in these high-risk patients. Additionally, variable collector contamination rates seen in this study highlight the necessity for frequent technique in-service training. [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6809269/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1693 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Klucher, Justin
Lakkad, Mrinmayee
Painter, Jacob
Dare, Ryan K
2013. Blood Culture Contamination in the Emergency Department: A Risk Factor Analysis
title 2013. Blood Culture Contamination in the Emergency Department: A Risk Factor Analysis
title_full 2013. Blood Culture Contamination in the Emergency Department: A Risk Factor Analysis
title_fullStr 2013. Blood Culture Contamination in the Emergency Department: A Risk Factor Analysis
title_full_unstemmed 2013. Blood Culture Contamination in the Emergency Department: A Risk Factor Analysis
title_short 2013. Blood Culture Contamination in the Emergency Department: A Risk Factor Analysis
title_sort 2013. blood culture contamination in the emergency department: a risk factor analysis
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6809269/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1693
work_keys_str_mv AT klucherjustin 2013bloodculturecontaminationintheemergencydepartmentariskfactoranalysis
AT lakkadmrinmayee 2013bloodculturecontaminationintheemergencydepartmentariskfactoranalysis
AT painterjacob 2013bloodculturecontaminationintheemergencydepartmentariskfactoranalysis
AT dareryank 2013bloodculturecontaminationintheemergencydepartmentariskfactoranalysis