Cargando…

1212. Environmental Contamination Characterization of Two Outpatient Clinics

BACKGROUND: Environmental contamination in outpatient clinics is poorly understood. METHODS: We performed a microbiological analysis of surfaces in wound and pulmonary outpatient clinics at a tertiary care center. Cultures were obtained with pre-moistened cellulose sponges from three locations (Exam...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Warren, Bobby G, Turner, Nicholas A, Smith, Becky A, Addison, Rachel, Marden, Samantha, Weber, David J, Rutala, William, Anderson, Deverick J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6809275/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1075
_version_ 1783461946219036672
author Warren, Bobby G
Turner, Nicholas A
Smith, Becky A
Addison, Rachel
Marden, Samantha
Weber, David J
Rutala, William
Anderson, Deverick J
author_facet Warren, Bobby G
Turner, Nicholas A
Smith, Becky A
Addison, Rachel
Marden, Samantha
Weber, David J
Rutala, William
Anderson, Deverick J
author_sort Warren, Bobby G
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Environmental contamination in outpatient clinics is poorly understood. METHODS: We performed a microbiological analysis of surfaces in wound and pulmonary outpatient clinics at a tertiary care center. Cultures were obtained with pre-moistened cellulose sponges from three locations (Exam bed/chair, patient chair, physician area/chair) before and after clinic days. Sponges were combined with 1% Tween20-PBS and mixed in the Seward Stomacher. The homogenate was centrifuged and all but 5 mL of the supernatant was discarded. Samples were plated on Sheep’s blood agar and selective media for S. aureus, Enterococcus spp. and Gram-negative bacteria. CFU was determined by counting the number of colonies on each plate and using dilution calculations to calculate the CFU of the original ~5 mL homogenate. The total sample areas in the wound and pulmonary clinic were 12,735 cm(2) and 16,400 cm(2), respectively. RESULTS: A total of 300 samples were obtained over 90-days. Median total room CFU was 7,918 (IQR 2,939–18,855) (Figure 1). Median CFU for the examination area, patient area and physician areas were 2090 (537–10508), 1524 (573–4605) and 960 (371–2183), respectively (Figure 2). The proportions of samples positive for S. aureus, Enterococcus spp. and Gram-negative bacteria were 5.0, 3.3 and 7.7%, respectively (Table 1). In general, median total CFU increased during the clinic day (median CFU before the clinic day 6883 (2937–14983) vs. median after clinic day=10351 (3484–21263) (Figure 3). Environmental bioburden was higher in the wound clinic than the pulmonary clinic (median 18206 CFU [IQR 10048–25037) vs. 3764 [IQR 1452–6671], P < 0.001) (Figure 1). The average number of patients seen in the wound clinic per clinic day was greater than the pulmonary clinic (3.8 vs. 2.2, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Outpatient clinic rooms were contaminated with clinically important pathogens. Contamination varied by environmental location and increased as the clinic day progressed. Higher contamination was seen in the wound clinic possibly due to higher patient volume vs. increased environmental contamination that occurs while giving wound care. Wound care clinics may need to focus on more detailed cleaning to reduce environmental contamination and the risk of pathogen transmission in at-risk patients. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6809275
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68092752019-10-28 1212. Environmental Contamination Characterization of Two Outpatient Clinics Warren, Bobby G Turner, Nicholas A Smith, Becky A Addison, Rachel Marden, Samantha Weber, David J Rutala, William Anderson, Deverick J Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Environmental contamination in outpatient clinics is poorly understood. METHODS: We performed a microbiological analysis of surfaces in wound and pulmonary outpatient clinics at a tertiary care center. Cultures were obtained with pre-moistened cellulose sponges from three locations (Exam bed/chair, patient chair, physician area/chair) before and after clinic days. Sponges were combined with 1% Tween20-PBS and mixed in the Seward Stomacher. The homogenate was centrifuged and all but 5 mL of the supernatant was discarded. Samples were plated on Sheep’s blood agar and selective media for S. aureus, Enterococcus spp. and Gram-negative bacteria. CFU was determined by counting the number of colonies on each plate and using dilution calculations to calculate the CFU of the original ~5 mL homogenate. The total sample areas in the wound and pulmonary clinic were 12,735 cm(2) and 16,400 cm(2), respectively. RESULTS: A total of 300 samples were obtained over 90-days. Median total room CFU was 7,918 (IQR 2,939–18,855) (Figure 1). Median CFU for the examination area, patient area and physician areas were 2090 (537–10508), 1524 (573–4605) and 960 (371–2183), respectively (Figure 2). The proportions of samples positive for S. aureus, Enterococcus spp. and Gram-negative bacteria were 5.0, 3.3 and 7.7%, respectively (Table 1). In general, median total CFU increased during the clinic day (median CFU before the clinic day 6883 (2937–14983) vs. median after clinic day=10351 (3484–21263) (Figure 3). Environmental bioburden was higher in the wound clinic than the pulmonary clinic (median 18206 CFU [IQR 10048–25037) vs. 3764 [IQR 1452–6671], P < 0.001) (Figure 1). The average number of patients seen in the wound clinic per clinic day was greater than the pulmonary clinic (3.8 vs. 2.2, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Outpatient clinic rooms were contaminated with clinically important pathogens. Contamination varied by environmental location and increased as the clinic day progressed. Higher contamination was seen in the wound clinic possibly due to higher patient volume vs. increased environmental contamination that occurs while giving wound care. Wound care clinics may need to focus on more detailed cleaning to reduce environmental contamination and the risk of pathogen transmission in at-risk patients. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6809275/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1075 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Warren, Bobby G
Turner, Nicholas A
Smith, Becky A
Addison, Rachel
Marden, Samantha
Weber, David J
Rutala, William
Anderson, Deverick J
1212. Environmental Contamination Characterization of Two Outpatient Clinics
title 1212. Environmental Contamination Characterization of Two Outpatient Clinics
title_full 1212. Environmental Contamination Characterization of Two Outpatient Clinics
title_fullStr 1212. Environmental Contamination Characterization of Two Outpatient Clinics
title_full_unstemmed 1212. Environmental Contamination Characterization of Two Outpatient Clinics
title_short 1212. Environmental Contamination Characterization of Two Outpatient Clinics
title_sort 1212. environmental contamination characterization of two outpatient clinics
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6809275/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1075
work_keys_str_mv AT warrenbobbyg 1212environmentalcontaminationcharacterizationoftwooutpatientclinics
AT turnernicholasa 1212environmentalcontaminationcharacterizationoftwooutpatientclinics
AT smithbeckya 1212environmentalcontaminationcharacterizationoftwooutpatientclinics
AT addisonrachel 1212environmentalcontaminationcharacterizationoftwooutpatientclinics
AT mardensamantha 1212environmentalcontaminationcharacterizationoftwooutpatientclinics
AT weberdavidj 1212environmentalcontaminationcharacterizationoftwooutpatientclinics
AT rutalawilliam 1212environmentalcontaminationcharacterizationoftwooutpatientclinics
AT andersondeverickj 1212environmentalcontaminationcharacterizationoftwooutpatientclinics