Cargando…

2001. Assessment of Real-world Effectiveness of a Rapid Blood Culture Diagnostic Panel at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center

BACKGROUND: Rapid blood culture diagnostics can improve patient outcomes, particularly when paired with robust interventions such as 24/7 stewardship coverage. We sought to determine the clinical impact of a rapid blood culture identification (BCID) panel (BioFire® FilmArray Multiplex PCR) in an est...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chiasson, Jordan, Cutrell, James B, Tomasz, Jodlowski, Smith, Winter, Kouma, Marcus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6809280/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1681
_version_ 1783461947473133568
author Chiasson, Jordan
Cutrell, James B
Cutrell, James B
Tomasz, Jodlowski
Smith, Winter
Kouma, Marcus
author_facet Chiasson, Jordan
Cutrell, James B
Cutrell, James B
Tomasz, Jodlowski
Smith, Winter
Kouma, Marcus
author_sort Chiasson, Jordan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Rapid blood culture diagnostics can improve patient outcomes, particularly when paired with robust interventions such as 24/7 stewardship coverage. We sought to determine the clinical impact of a rapid blood culture identification (BCID) panel (BioFire® FilmArray Multiplex PCR) in an established antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP). In addition to clinician education, BCID results were reviewed by the ASP team during weekday business hours, for an average of 2 hours daily based on availability. METHODS: Data on demographics, blood cultures, antimicrobial use, length of stay and mortality were collected on inpatients at the VA North Texas Health Care System with at least one positive blood culture for bacterial or yeast isolates from March 2017 to June 2017 (pre-BCID) and from March 2018 to June 2018 (post-BCID). The primary outcome was a composite of time to optimal therapy from blood culture collection, defined as escalation, de-escalation, discontinuation, or optimization of antimicrobials retrospectively adjudicated based on final culture results. Secondary outcomes included time to effective therapy, total days of therapy (DOT), length of stay, and 30-day mortality and readmission rates. RESULTS: 195 patients were screened with 130 patients included in the study. No significant differences in baseline characteristics were observed between groups (Table 1). Sixty-one patients were included in the pre-BCID arm and 69 in the post-BCID arm. Median time to optimal therapy was 82.9 hours (IQR; 12.8–99.8) in the pre-BCID arm and 33.9 hours (IQR; 11.2–64.8) in the post-BCID arm (P = 0.005) (Table 2). No significant change in 30-day mortality or 30-day readmission rates was noted. Vancomycin DOT was 4 days (IQR; 2–5) and 3 days (IQR; 1–4) (P = 0.024), and piperacillin–tazobactam DOT was 4 (IQR; 0–5) and 2 (IQR; 0–4) (P = 0.043), in the pre-BCID and post-BCID groups, respectively (Figure 1). CONCLUSION: Introduction of BCID into the daily workflow of our ASP resulted in a significant reduction in time to optimal therapy for bloodstream infections. DOT for select broad-spectrum antibiotics were also significantly reduced. This study highlights the potential benefit of rapid diagnostics without negative impact to patient care even in settings without resources for 24/7 ASP review. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6809280
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68092802019-10-28 2001. Assessment of Real-world Effectiveness of a Rapid Blood Culture Diagnostic Panel at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center Chiasson, Jordan Cutrell, James B Cutrell, James B Tomasz, Jodlowski Smith, Winter Kouma, Marcus Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Rapid blood culture diagnostics can improve patient outcomes, particularly when paired with robust interventions such as 24/7 stewardship coverage. We sought to determine the clinical impact of a rapid blood culture identification (BCID) panel (BioFire® FilmArray Multiplex PCR) in an established antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP). In addition to clinician education, BCID results were reviewed by the ASP team during weekday business hours, for an average of 2 hours daily based on availability. METHODS: Data on demographics, blood cultures, antimicrobial use, length of stay and mortality were collected on inpatients at the VA North Texas Health Care System with at least one positive blood culture for bacterial or yeast isolates from March 2017 to June 2017 (pre-BCID) and from March 2018 to June 2018 (post-BCID). The primary outcome was a composite of time to optimal therapy from blood culture collection, defined as escalation, de-escalation, discontinuation, or optimization of antimicrobials retrospectively adjudicated based on final culture results. Secondary outcomes included time to effective therapy, total days of therapy (DOT), length of stay, and 30-day mortality and readmission rates. RESULTS: 195 patients were screened with 130 patients included in the study. No significant differences in baseline characteristics were observed between groups (Table 1). Sixty-one patients were included in the pre-BCID arm and 69 in the post-BCID arm. Median time to optimal therapy was 82.9 hours (IQR; 12.8–99.8) in the pre-BCID arm and 33.9 hours (IQR; 11.2–64.8) in the post-BCID arm (P = 0.005) (Table 2). No significant change in 30-day mortality or 30-day readmission rates was noted. Vancomycin DOT was 4 days (IQR; 2–5) and 3 days (IQR; 1–4) (P = 0.024), and piperacillin–tazobactam DOT was 4 (IQR; 0–5) and 2 (IQR; 0–4) (P = 0.043), in the pre-BCID and post-BCID groups, respectively (Figure 1). CONCLUSION: Introduction of BCID into the daily workflow of our ASP resulted in a significant reduction in time to optimal therapy for bloodstream infections. DOT for select broad-spectrum antibiotics were also significantly reduced. This study highlights the potential benefit of rapid diagnostics without negative impact to patient care even in settings without resources for 24/7 ASP review. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6809280/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1681 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Chiasson, Jordan
Cutrell, James B
Cutrell, James B
Tomasz, Jodlowski
Smith, Winter
Kouma, Marcus
2001. Assessment of Real-world Effectiveness of a Rapid Blood Culture Diagnostic Panel at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center
title 2001. Assessment of Real-world Effectiveness of a Rapid Blood Culture Diagnostic Panel at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center
title_full 2001. Assessment of Real-world Effectiveness of a Rapid Blood Culture Diagnostic Panel at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center
title_fullStr 2001. Assessment of Real-world Effectiveness of a Rapid Blood Culture Diagnostic Panel at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center
title_full_unstemmed 2001. Assessment of Real-world Effectiveness of a Rapid Blood Culture Diagnostic Panel at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center
title_short 2001. Assessment of Real-world Effectiveness of a Rapid Blood Culture Diagnostic Panel at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center
title_sort 2001. assessment of real-world effectiveness of a rapid blood culture diagnostic panel at a veterans affairs medical center
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6809280/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1681
work_keys_str_mv AT chiassonjordan 2001assessmentofrealworldeffectivenessofarapidbloodculturediagnosticpanelataveteransaffairsmedicalcenter
AT cutrelljamesb 2001assessmentofrealworldeffectivenessofarapidbloodculturediagnosticpanelataveteransaffairsmedicalcenter
AT cutrelljamesb 2001assessmentofrealworldeffectivenessofarapidbloodculturediagnosticpanelataveteransaffairsmedicalcenter
AT tomaszjodlowski 2001assessmentofrealworldeffectivenessofarapidbloodculturediagnosticpanelataveteransaffairsmedicalcenter
AT smithwinter 2001assessmentofrealworldeffectivenessofarapidbloodculturediagnosticpanelataveteransaffairsmedicalcenter
AT koumamarcus 2001assessmentofrealworldeffectivenessofarapidbloodculturediagnosticpanelataveteransaffairsmedicalcenter