Cargando…

1176. Antibiotic Prophylaxis Strategies Prior to Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: A Survey of Practice

BACKGROUND: Short duration, single-agent antimicrobial prophylaxis with anti-staphylococcal activity is recommended at the time of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) placement to prevent infection-related complications. Despite consensus guidelines, there continues to be wide variability in antim...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mourad, Ahmad, Bishawi, Muath, Arif, Sana, Miller, Rachel, Maskarinec, Stacey
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6809402/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1039
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Short duration, single-agent antimicrobial prophylaxis with anti-staphylococcal activity is recommended at the time of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) placement to prevent infection-related complications. Despite consensus guidelines, there continues to be wide variability in antimicrobial regimens among implantation centers. The aim of this study was to characterize current peri-operative antimicrobial prophylactic strategies at different LVAD implantation centers. METHODS: A survey study was conducted from September 26, 2017 to October 25, 2017. Surveys were distributed electronically to both LVAD coordinators and infectious diseases specialists at 75 US medical centers identified as having an LVAD program. Data collection included information about antimicrobial selection, duration, MRSA screening and decolonization procedures. RESULTS: We received 29 survey responses. The majority of surveys were completed by infectious diseases physicians [72.4% (21/29)]. Most responding centers reported LVAD programs established for >10 years [20/29 (69%)]. Cardiac transplantation was performed in 28/29 (96%) centers. Of centers reporting a defined antimicrobial prophylaxis regimen for nonpenicillin allergic patients [97% (28/29)], 17.9% (5/28) reported a four-drug regimen, 35.7% (10/28) reported a three-drug regimen, and 46.4% (13/28) reported a two-drug regimen, while no centers reported a single-drug regimen. Empiric fluconazole was common [50% (14/28)] and 96.4% (27/28) of regimens included Vancomycin. Duration of antimicrobial prophylaxis (24 h-5 d), MRSA screening, decolonization procedures, and alterations due to drug allergies varied significantly across participating centers. CONCLUSION: Our survey results indicate a wide variation in the peri-operative antimicrobial prophylaxis regimens among participating LVAD centers. These results highlight the need for further studies evaluating the utility, toxicity, and stewardship implications of multi-drug regimens and whether specific clinical factors that prolong antimicrobial duration impact post-operative LVAD-related infection rates. DISCLOSURES: Rachel Miller, MD, Synexis: Research Grant.