Cargando…

1713. Impact of False-Positive Low-Titer Cryptococcal Antigen Testing

BACKGROUND: At University of Kentucky (UK) HealthCare, the transition from latex agglutination testing (Remel, Lenexa, KS) to IMMY Cryptococcal Antigen Lateral Flow Assay (CrAg LFA) occurred in September 2016. A few months later, it was noticed that several cryptococcal cases were diagnosed with wea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bhatt, Mahesh, Ribes, Julie A, Arora, Vaneet, Myint, Thein
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6809408/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1576
_version_ 1783461980568289280
author Bhatt, Mahesh
Ribes, Julie A
Arora, Vaneet
Myint, Thein
author_facet Bhatt, Mahesh
Ribes, Julie A
Arora, Vaneet
Myint, Thein
author_sort Bhatt, Mahesh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: At University of Kentucky (UK) HealthCare, the transition from latex agglutination testing (Remel, Lenexa, KS) to IMMY Cryptococcal Antigen Lateral Flow Assay (CrAg LFA) occurred in September 2016. A few months later, it was noticed that several cryptococcal cases were diagnosed with weak positive test results where the diagnosis could not be confirmed by additional testing. The purpose of this study was to analyze the characteristics of these patients, and to assess the interventions they received based on positive results. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of the patients with positive CrAg LFA treated at UK HealthCare from November to December 2016. Low antigen titers (≤ 1:20) were considered to be false positive if repeat testing with the Remel Cryptococcal Latex assay, IMMY latex and IMMY microwell EIA were negative, cultures and histopathology were negative and there was no clear clinical evidence of infection. RESULTS: During this 2-month period, CrAg LFA was positive in 12 patients. The diagnosis of cryptococcosis could not be confirmed by additional testing in 9 (75%) individuals. Cirrhosis/liver disease was present in 3 (33.3%) patients, 5 (55.6%) underwent lumber puncture and antifungal therapy was administered in 8 (88.9%) patients (Table 1). CrAg LFA was false positive in 1/2 (50%) HIV, 3/3 (100%) transplant, and 5/7 (71.4%) non-HIV/non-transplant patients (Figure 1). Among the false positives, 4 (44.4%) patients had titer of 1:5, two (22.2%) had 1:20, and the original positive screen was not detected upon titration in 3 (33.3%) other patients. One HIV patient received a complete treatment course for unconfirmed cryptococcal meningitis because an LP could not be performed. CONCLUSION: False-positive low CrAg LFA titers led to unnecessary tests, antifungal treatments and prolonged hospitalization in some patients. One-third of these individuals had cirrhosis/liver disease. Other institutions also reported false-positive low CrAg LFA titers. As a result, the company staged a recall of the specific lot and corrected the problem in reagent manufacturing. Low-positive titers using CrAg LFA should be interpreted carefully and further testing should be considered as determined by the clinical situation. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6809408
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68094082019-10-28 1713. Impact of False-Positive Low-Titer Cryptococcal Antigen Testing Bhatt, Mahesh Ribes, Julie A Arora, Vaneet Myint, Thein Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: At University of Kentucky (UK) HealthCare, the transition from latex agglutination testing (Remel, Lenexa, KS) to IMMY Cryptococcal Antigen Lateral Flow Assay (CrAg LFA) occurred in September 2016. A few months later, it was noticed that several cryptococcal cases were diagnosed with weak positive test results where the diagnosis could not be confirmed by additional testing. The purpose of this study was to analyze the characteristics of these patients, and to assess the interventions they received based on positive results. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of the patients with positive CrAg LFA treated at UK HealthCare from November to December 2016. Low antigen titers (≤ 1:20) were considered to be false positive if repeat testing with the Remel Cryptococcal Latex assay, IMMY latex and IMMY microwell EIA were negative, cultures and histopathology were negative and there was no clear clinical evidence of infection. RESULTS: During this 2-month period, CrAg LFA was positive in 12 patients. The diagnosis of cryptococcosis could not be confirmed by additional testing in 9 (75%) individuals. Cirrhosis/liver disease was present in 3 (33.3%) patients, 5 (55.6%) underwent lumber puncture and antifungal therapy was administered in 8 (88.9%) patients (Table 1). CrAg LFA was false positive in 1/2 (50%) HIV, 3/3 (100%) transplant, and 5/7 (71.4%) non-HIV/non-transplant patients (Figure 1). Among the false positives, 4 (44.4%) patients had titer of 1:5, two (22.2%) had 1:20, and the original positive screen was not detected upon titration in 3 (33.3%) other patients. One HIV patient received a complete treatment course for unconfirmed cryptococcal meningitis because an LP could not be performed. CONCLUSION: False-positive low CrAg LFA titers led to unnecessary tests, antifungal treatments and prolonged hospitalization in some patients. One-third of these individuals had cirrhosis/liver disease. Other institutions also reported false-positive low CrAg LFA titers. As a result, the company staged a recall of the specific lot and corrected the problem in reagent manufacturing. Low-positive titers using CrAg LFA should be interpreted carefully and further testing should be considered as determined by the clinical situation. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6809408/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1576 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Bhatt, Mahesh
Ribes, Julie A
Arora, Vaneet
Myint, Thein
1713. Impact of False-Positive Low-Titer Cryptococcal Antigen Testing
title 1713. Impact of False-Positive Low-Titer Cryptococcal Antigen Testing
title_full 1713. Impact of False-Positive Low-Titer Cryptococcal Antigen Testing
title_fullStr 1713. Impact of False-Positive Low-Titer Cryptococcal Antigen Testing
title_full_unstemmed 1713. Impact of False-Positive Low-Titer Cryptococcal Antigen Testing
title_short 1713. Impact of False-Positive Low-Titer Cryptococcal Antigen Testing
title_sort 1713. impact of false-positive low-titer cryptococcal antigen testing
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6809408/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1576
work_keys_str_mv AT bhattmahesh 1713impactoffalsepositivelowtitercryptococcalantigentesting
AT ribesjuliea 1713impactoffalsepositivelowtitercryptococcalantigentesting
AT aroravaneet 1713impactoffalsepositivelowtitercryptococcalantigentesting
AT myintthein 1713impactoffalsepositivelowtitercryptococcalantigentesting