Cargando…

896. A Safe, More Cost-Effective Protocol: Universal Decolonization vs. MRSA Screening and Contact Precautions

BACKGROUND: A trial of universal decolonization (alcohol-based nasal antiseptic plus chlorhexidine gluconate bathing) was instituted for 12 months, in a 536-bed short-term acute care hospital, as a replacement for nasal screening, contact precautions (CP) and decolonization of methicillin-resistant...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Whitaker, Jacqueline, Kusha, Barmak, Longcoy, Joshua, Rutter, Amanda H, Ferrier, Sheryl, Marzi, Caitlin R, Montalvo Gonzalez, Leslie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6809439/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz359.055
_version_ 1783461988659101696
author Whitaker, Jacqueline
Kusha, Barmak
Longcoy, Joshua
Rutter, Amanda H
Ferrier, Sheryl
Marzi, Caitlin R
Montalvo Gonzalez, Leslie
author_facet Whitaker, Jacqueline
Kusha, Barmak
Longcoy, Joshua
Rutter, Amanda H
Ferrier, Sheryl
Marzi, Caitlin R
Montalvo Gonzalez, Leslie
author_sort Whitaker, Jacqueline
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A trial of universal decolonization (alcohol-based nasal antiseptic plus chlorhexidine gluconate bathing) was instituted for 12 months, in a 536-bed short-term acute care hospital, as a replacement for nasal screening, contact precautions (CP) and decolonization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)-colonized patients. The impact on the rate of MRSA bacteremia and costs associated with nasal screening tests, isolation, and gown use was assessed. METHODS: Prior to the universal decolonization trial, patients at high-risk for MRSA colonization were screened using a nasal polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test, and those that tested positive were decolonized with 5 days of mupirocin nasal ointment and daily CHG bathing, and were placed in CP. Starting in April 2018, a universal decolonization protocol was instituted for all hospitalized patients, with a twice-daily alcohol-based nasal antiseptic (in place of mupirocin), and daily bathing with CHG foam soap (in place of CHG cloths). Nasal screening of high-risk patients, targeted decolonization and CP for MRSA-colonized patients, was discontinued during the 12-month universal decolonization trial period. Outcome measures for the trial included MRSA bacteremia per National Healthcare Surveillance Network (NHSN) multi-drug-resistant organism (MDRO) Lab ID definition, isolation day count, utilization of gowns, and nasal screening tests with estimated costs associated. Measures for the 12-month trial period were compared with those of the prior 12-month period, i.e., April 2017–March 2018. RESULTS: Compared with prior 12-month period, during the universal decolonization trial, there was a 42% reduction in isolation days ($118/day), a 74% reduction in nasal PCR tests ($36/each), and an 11% decrease in the monthly use of gowns ($12/each). The total cost avoidance (after accounting for the cost of the alcohol-based nasal antiseptic and CHG soap) was $1,394,685. There was no statistical change in the MRSA bacteremia rate (0.067 to 0.070) per 1,000 patient-days. CONCLUSION: Replacement of nasal screening, decolonization, and CP for colonized MRSA patients with universal decolonization, using twice daily alcohol-based nasal antiseptic paired with daily CHG bathing, was found to be a safe and cost-saving protocol. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported Disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6809439
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68094392019-10-28 896. A Safe, More Cost-Effective Protocol: Universal Decolonization vs. MRSA Screening and Contact Precautions Whitaker, Jacqueline Kusha, Barmak Longcoy, Joshua Rutter, Amanda H Ferrier, Sheryl Marzi, Caitlin R Montalvo Gonzalez, Leslie Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: A trial of universal decolonization (alcohol-based nasal antiseptic plus chlorhexidine gluconate bathing) was instituted for 12 months, in a 536-bed short-term acute care hospital, as a replacement for nasal screening, contact precautions (CP) and decolonization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)-colonized patients. The impact on the rate of MRSA bacteremia and costs associated with nasal screening tests, isolation, and gown use was assessed. METHODS: Prior to the universal decolonization trial, patients at high-risk for MRSA colonization were screened using a nasal polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test, and those that tested positive were decolonized with 5 days of mupirocin nasal ointment and daily CHG bathing, and were placed in CP. Starting in April 2018, a universal decolonization protocol was instituted for all hospitalized patients, with a twice-daily alcohol-based nasal antiseptic (in place of mupirocin), and daily bathing with CHG foam soap (in place of CHG cloths). Nasal screening of high-risk patients, targeted decolonization and CP for MRSA-colonized patients, was discontinued during the 12-month universal decolonization trial period. Outcome measures for the trial included MRSA bacteremia per National Healthcare Surveillance Network (NHSN) multi-drug-resistant organism (MDRO) Lab ID definition, isolation day count, utilization of gowns, and nasal screening tests with estimated costs associated. Measures for the 12-month trial period were compared with those of the prior 12-month period, i.e., April 2017–March 2018. RESULTS: Compared with prior 12-month period, during the universal decolonization trial, there was a 42% reduction in isolation days ($118/day), a 74% reduction in nasal PCR tests ($36/each), and an 11% decrease in the monthly use of gowns ($12/each). The total cost avoidance (after accounting for the cost of the alcohol-based nasal antiseptic and CHG soap) was $1,394,685. There was no statistical change in the MRSA bacteremia rate (0.067 to 0.070) per 1,000 patient-days. CONCLUSION: Replacement of nasal screening, decolonization, and CP for colonized MRSA patients with universal decolonization, using twice daily alcohol-based nasal antiseptic paired with daily CHG bathing, was found to be a safe and cost-saving protocol. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported Disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6809439/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz359.055 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Whitaker, Jacqueline
Kusha, Barmak
Longcoy, Joshua
Rutter, Amanda H
Ferrier, Sheryl
Marzi, Caitlin R
Montalvo Gonzalez, Leslie
896. A Safe, More Cost-Effective Protocol: Universal Decolonization vs. MRSA Screening and Contact Precautions
title 896. A Safe, More Cost-Effective Protocol: Universal Decolonization vs. MRSA Screening and Contact Precautions
title_full 896. A Safe, More Cost-Effective Protocol: Universal Decolonization vs. MRSA Screening and Contact Precautions
title_fullStr 896. A Safe, More Cost-Effective Protocol: Universal Decolonization vs. MRSA Screening and Contact Precautions
title_full_unstemmed 896. A Safe, More Cost-Effective Protocol: Universal Decolonization vs. MRSA Screening and Contact Precautions
title_short 896. A Safe, More Cost-Effective Protocol: Universal Decolonization vs. MRSA Screening and Contact Precautions
title_sort 896. a safe, more cost-effective protocol: universal decolonization vs. mrsa screening and contact precautions
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6809439/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz359.055
work_keys_str_mv AT whitakerjacqueline 896asafemorecosteffectiveprotocoluniversaldecolonizationvsmrsascreeningandcontactprecautions
AT kushabarmak 896asafemorecosteffectiveprotocoluniversaldecolonizationvsmrsascreeningandcontactprecautions
AT longcoyjoshua 896asafemorecosteffectiveprotocoluniversaldecolonizationvsmrsascreeningandcontactprecautions
AT rutteramandah 896asafemorecosteffectiveprotocoluniversaldecolonizationvsmrsascreeningandcontactprecautions
AT ferriersheryl 896asafemorecosteffectiveprotocoluniversaldecolonizationvsmrsascreeningandcontactprecautions
AT marzicaitlinr 896asafemorecosteffectiveprotocoluniversaldecolonizationvsmrsascreeningandcontactprecautions
AT montalvogonzalezleslie 896asafemorecosteffectiveprotocoluniversaldecolonizationvsmrsascreeningandcontactprecautions