Cargando…

1297. Examining the Successes and Challenges of Implementing HIV Testing Clinical Decision Support in the Emergency Department

BACKGROUND: In 2016, MetroHealth System (MHS) launched the FOCUS (Frontlines of Communities in the United States) project to routinize HIV testing in the emergency department (ED). Before 2016, clinical decision support (CDS) for HIV testing was not in place, nor was there a policy to support the im...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Powell, Mariah, Gierlach, Michael, Werner, Sandra L, Bar-Shain, David S, Avery, Ann
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6809440/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1160
_version_ 1783461988947460096
author Powell, Mariah
Gierlach, Michael
Werner, Sandra L
Bar-Shain, David S
Avery, Ann
author_facet Powell, Mariah
Gierlach, Michael
Werner, Sandra L
Bar-Shain, David S
Avery, Ann
author_sort Powell, Mariah
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In 2016, MetroHealth System (MHS) launched the FOCUS (Frontlines of Communities in the United States) project to routinize HIV testing in the emergency department (ED). Before 2016, clinical decision support (CDS) for HIV testing was not in place, nor was there a policy to support the importance of opt-out, nontargeted screening. The purpose of this study was to outline the progress of HIV testing after the integration of CDS, as well as describe the implementation challenges, and how certain events impacted HIV testing. METHODS: HIV testing data from MHS EDs were collected from October 1, 2015 to March 31, 2019 and graphed into a run chart. The dataset was mapped with the following events: project start date, ED testing begins (without CDS), CDS implementation, the staffing of the ED Testing Coordinator (EDTC), and optimization of CDS (Figure 1). To determine whether observed variation in the dataset is due to random or special cause variation, these run chart rules were applied: Run, Shift (Figure 2), and Trend. RESULTS: There were 42 data points and 4 runs. With 42 points, the lower limit of runs was 16 and the upper limit of runs was 28. This signals that one or more special cause variations were present. A total of three distinct shifts were observed indicating special cause variation. The run chart did not include any downward or upward trends. Testing increased as much as 3971% (7 tests in October 2015 vs. 285 tests in March 2018). CONCLUSION: HIV testing increased from 7 tests to 86 tests (Shift 1). This coincided with establishment of an ED testing policy in April 2016. Testing increased to 266 tests in October 2016 (Shift 2). This directly related to implementation of CDS in the ED. December 2017 displayed the lowest testing with 117 tests. This was due to lack of policy awareness, and to the rarely-visited location of the HIV screening tool during the triage process. Staff was re-educated and the HIV screening tool was moved to a more visible location. This resulted in 227 tests in February 2018, and was followed by the highest testing month with 285 tests (Shift 3). Continued challenges prohibit sustained upward trends in ED testing. A control chart may be the appropriate next step to identify new control limits [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6809440
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68094402019-10-28 1297. Examining the Successes and Challenges of Implementing HIV Testing Clinical Decision Support in the Emergency Department Powell, Mariah Gierlach, Michael Werner, Sandra L Bar-Shain, David S Avery, Ann Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: In 2016, MetroHealth System (MHS) launched the FOCUS (Frontlines of Communities in the United States) project to routinize HIV testing in the emergency department (ED). Before 2016, clinical decision support (CDS) for HIV testing was not in place, nor was there a policy to support the importance of opt-out, nontargeted screening. The purpose of this study was to outline the progress of HIV testing after the integration of CDS, as well as describe the implementation challenges, and how certain events impacted HIV testing. METHODS: HIV testing data from MHS EDs were collected from October 1, 2015 to March 31, 2019 and graphed into a run chart. The dataset was mapped with the following events: project start date, ED testing begins (without CDS), CDS implementation, the staffing of the ED Testing Coordinator (EDTC), and optimization of CDS (Figure 1). To determine whether observed variation in the dataset is due to random or special cause variation, these run chart rules were applied: Run, Shift (Figure 2), and Trend. RESULTS: There were 42 data points and 4 runs. With 42 points, the lower limit of runs was 16 and the upper limit of runs was 28. This signals that one or more special cause variations were present. A total of three distinct shifts were observed indicating special cause variation. The run chart did not include any downward or upward trends. Testing increased as much as 3971% (7 tests in October 2015 vs. 285 tests in March 2018). CONCLUSION: HIV testing increased from 7 tests to 86 tests (Shift 1). This coincided with establishment of an ED testing policy in April 2016. Testing increased to 266 tests in October 2016 (Shift 2). This directly related to implementation of CDS in the ED. December 2017 displayed the lowest testing with 117 tests. This was due to lack of policy awareness, and to the rarely-visited location of the HIV screening tool during the triage process. Staff was re-educated and the HIV screening tool was moved to a more visible location. This resulted in 227 tests in February 2018, and was followed by the highest testing month with 285 tests (Shift 3). Continued challenges prohibit sustained upward trends in ED testing. A control chart may be the appropriate next step to identify new control limits [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6809440/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1160 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Powell, Mariah
Gierlach, Michael
Werner, Sandra L
Bar-Shain, David S
Avery, Ann
1297. Examining the Successes and Challenges of Implementing HIV Testing Clinical Decision Support in the Emergency Department
title 1297. Examining the Successes and Challenges of Implementing HIV Testing Clinical Decision Support in the Emergency Department
title_full 1297. Examining the Successes and Challenges of Implementing HIV Testing Clinical Decision Support in the Emergency Department
title_fullStr 1297. Examining the Successes and Challenges of Implementing HIV Testing Clinical Decision Support in the Emergency Department
title_full_unstemmed 1297. Examining the Successes and Challenges of Implementing HIV Testing Clinical Decision Support in the Emergency Department
title_short 1297. Examining the Successes and Challenges of Implementing HIV Testing Clinical Decision Support in the Emergency Department
title_sort 1297. examining the successes and challenges of implementing hiv testing clinical decision support in the emergency department
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6809440/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1160
work_keys_str_mv AT powellmariah 1297examiningthesuccessesandchallengesofimplementinghivtestingclinicaldecisionsupportintheemergencydepartment
AT gierlachmichael 1297examiningthesuccessesandchallengesofimplementinghivtestingclinicaldecisionsupportintheemergencydepartment
AT wernersandral 1297examiningthesuccessesandchallengesofimplementinghivtestingclinicaldecisionsupportintheemergencydepartment
AT barshaindavids 1297examiningthesuccessesandchallengesofimplementinghivtestingclinicaldecisionsupportintheemergencydepartment
AT averyann 1297examiningthesuccessesandchallengesofimplementinghivtestingclinicaldecisionsupportintheemergencydepartment