Cargando…

148. Retrospective Evaluation of Acute Cholangitis and Clinical Implication and Management of Secondary Bacteremia

BACKGROUND: Optimum duration of antimicrobial therapy for acute bacteremic cholangitis is not well established; however, 4–7 days is recommended by the 2018 Tokyo guidelines in those without Gram-positive bacteremia. METHODS: A retrospective study performed at Mayo Clinic - Rochester, Florida and Ar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hamdi, Ahmed, Yetmar, Zachary A, Miller, Alexander T, Diaz, Mark, Fida, Madiha, Beam, Elena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6809456/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.223
_version_ 1783461993019080704
author Hamdi, Ahmed
Yetmar, Zachary A
Miller, Alexander T
Diaz, Mark
Fida, Madiha
Beam, Elena
author_facet Hamdi, Ahmed
Yetmar, Zachary A
Miller, Alexander T
Diaz, Mark
Fida, Madiha
Beam, Elena
author_sort Hamdi, Ahmed
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Optimum duration of antimicrobial therapy for acute bacteremic cholangitis is not well established; however, 4–7 days is recommended by the 2018 Tokyo guidelines in those without Gram-positive bacteremia. METHODS: A retrospective study performed at Mayo Clinic - Rochester, Florida and Arizona sites was conducted, reviewing all adult patients with the first episode of acute cholangitis secondary to biliary stone obstruction, between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2017. We reviewed the duration of prescribed antimicrobials. RESULTS: Among 331 included cases, 197(60%) were men, 66 (20%) were immuno-compromised. Presenting symptoms included fever in 202 (61.5%), abdominal pain in 289 (87%), jaundice 128(38.7%), and altered mentation in 49 (15%). Among these, 256 (77%) were classified as “definite” and 38 (11.5%) were “suspected” using the 2018 Tokyo guideline classification. Cholangitis grade was grade III in 134 (40.5%); grade II in 115 (34.7%); and grade I in 82 (24.8%). Majority of cases, 321 (97%), underwent source control—most commonly 309 (96%) achieved by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Source control occurred within 24 hr of presentation in 197 (61.4%) of the cases. Bacteremia was documented in 131/277 (47%). Majority of bacteremias were due to Gram-negative organisms in 119 (91%). Mean duration of antibiotic therapy following “source control” was 9.6 days (SD 7.0). Cases with bacteremia, resulted in longer treatment duration, mean of 13 days (SD 5.6), regardless of the isolated organism. Overall 30 day mortality was 14/331 (4.2%). No mortality difference was noted in patients who underwent early (within 12 hours) vs. later source control (4.55% Vs. 4.53%), nor in those who received more or less than 6 days of antibiotic therapy after source control (4.7% Vs. 3.9%, P = 0.76). No difference in mortality was observed in those with or without bacteremia. CONCLUSION: Our results note the use of longer courses of antimicrobials for management of bacteremic cholangitis, regardless of the organism type. This population could be a prime target for an antimicrobial stewardship intervention, to decrease the duration of prescribed antimicrobials in accordance with recent guidelines. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6809456
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68094562019-10-28 148. Retrospective Evaluation of Acute Cholangitis and Clinical Implication and Management of Secondary Bacteremia Hamdi, Ahmed Yetmar, Zachary A Miller, Alexander T Diaz, Mark Fida, Madiha Beam, Elena Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Optimum duration of antimicrobial therapy for acute bacteremic cholangitis is not well established; however, 4–7 days is recommended by the 2018 Tokyo guidelines in those without Gram-positive bacteremia. METHODS: A retrospective study performed at Mayo Clinic - Rochester, Florida and Arizona sites was conducted, reviewing all adult patients with the first episode of acute cholangitis secondary to biliary stone obstruction, between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2017. We reviewed the duration of prescribed antimicrobials. RESULTS: Among 331 included cases, 197(60%) were men, 66 (20%) were immuno-compromised. Presenting symptoms included fever in 202 (61.5%), abdominal pain in 289 (87%), jaundice 128(38.7%), and altered mentation in 49 (15%). Among these, 256 (77%) were classified as “definite” and 38 (11.5%) were “suspected” using the 2018 Tokyo guideline classification. Cholangitis grade was grade III in 134 (40.5%); grade II in 115 (34.7%); and grade I in 82 (24.8%). Majority of cases, 321 (97%), underwent source control—most commonly 309 (96%) achieved by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Source control occurred within 24 hr of presentation in 197 (61.4%) of the cases. Bacteremia was documented in 131/277 (47%). Majority of bacteremias were due to Gram-negative organisms in 119 (91%). Mean duration of antibiotic therapy following “source control” was 9.6 days (SD 7.0). Cases with bacteremia, resulted in longer treatment duration, mean of 13 days (SD 5.6), regardless of the isolated organism. Overall 30 day mortality was 14/331 (4.2%). No mortality difference was noted in patients who underwent early (within 12 hours) vs. later source control (4.55% Vs. 4.53%), nor in those who received more or less than 6 days of antibiotic therapy after source control (4.7% Vs. 3.9%, P = 0.76). No difference in mortality was observed in those with or without bacteremia. CONCLUSION: Our results note the use of longer courses of antimicrobials for management of bacteremic cholangitis, regardless of the organism type. This population could be a prime target for an antimicrobial stewardship intervention, to decrease the duration of prescribed antimicrobials in accordance with recent guidelines. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6809456/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.223 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Hamdi, Ahmed
Yetmar, Zachary A
Miller, Alexander T
Diaz, Mark
Fida, Madiha
Beam, Elena
148. Retrospective Evaluation of Acute Cholangitis and Clinical Implication and Management of Secondary Bacteremia
title 148. Retrospective Evaluation of Acute Cholangitis and Clinical Implication and Management of Secondary Bacteremia
title_full 148. Retrospective Evaluation of Acute Cholangitis and Clinical Implication and Management of Secondary Bacteremia
title_fullStr 148. Retrospective Evaluation of Acute Cholangitis and Clinical Implication and Management of Secondary Bacteremia
title_full_unstemmed 148. Retrospective Evaluation of Acute Cholangitis and Clinical Implication and Management of Secondary Bacteremia
title_short 148. Retrospective Evaluation of Acute Cholangitis and Clinical Implication and Management of Secondary Bacteremia
title_sort 148. retrospective evaluation of acute cholangitis and clinical implication and management of secondary bacteremia
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6809456/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.223
work_keys_str_mv AT hamdiahmed 148retrospectiveevaluationofacutecholangitisandclinicalimplicationandmanagementofsecondarybacteremia
AT yetmarzacharya 148retrospectiveevaluationofacutecholangitisandclinicalimplicationandmanagementofsecondarybacteremia
AT milleralexandert 148retrospectiveevaluationofacutecholangitisandclinicalimplicationandmanagementofsecondarybacteremia
AT diazmark 148retrospectiveevaluationofacutecholangitisandclinicalimplicationandmanagementofsecondarybacteremia
AT fidamadiha 148retrospectiveevaluationofacutecholangitisandclinicalimplicationandmanagementofsecondarybacteremia
AT beamelena 148retrospectiveevaluationofacutecholangitisandclinicalimplicationandmanagementofsecondarybacteremia