Cargando…
423. Self-Reported Screening for Rectal Sexually Transmitted Infections Among Men Who Have Sex with Men
BACKGROUND: Rectal gonorrhea and Chlamydia are common and predict HIV acquisition among men who have sex with men (MSM); however, screening for rectal sexually transmitted infections (STIs) is not routine. METHODS: In 2017, we recruited sexually-active MSM in the Portland, Oregon metropolitan area t...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6809503/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.496 |
_version_ | 1783462004379353088 |
---|---|
author | William. Menza, Timothy Lipira, Lauren Bhattarai, Amisha Ramirez, Joseph Orellana, Roberto |
author_facet | William. Menza, Timothy Lipira, Lauren Bhattarai, Amisha Ramirez, Joseph Orellana, Roberto |
author_sort | William. Menza, Timothy |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Rectal gonorrhea and Chlamydia are common and predict HIV acquisition among men who have sex with men (MSM); however, screening for rectal sexually transmitted infections (STIs) is not routine. METHODS: In 2017, we recruited sexually-active MSM in the Portland, Oregon metropolitan area through venue-based sampling. Our outcome of interest was self-reported rectal STI screening in the prior 12 months. Stratified by HIV status, we assessed the prevalence and demographic, healthcare, clinical, and behavioral predictors of screening. RESULTS: Of 448 participants, 168 (37.5%) reported rectal STI screening. One hundred twenty-seven (35.8%) of 355 HIV-negative men, 41 (58.6%) of 70 HIV-positive men, and none of 23 men who did not know their HIV status reported screening. Among HIV-negative men, having a healthcare provider who offered HIV testing (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR]=2.09; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.43, 3.04), a syphilis diagnosis (aPR=1.32; 95% CI: 1.03, 1.69), use of pre-exposure prophylaxis (aPR=1.57; 95% CI 1.21, 2.04), and condomless anal sex with casual partners in the prior 12 months (aPR=1.74; 95% CI: 1.36, 2.22) independently predicted screening for rectal STI in multivariable analysis. HIV-positive men who reported having a provider who always or often initiates conversations about sex were significantly more likely to report screening compared with men who did not have such a provider (aPR=1.48; 95% CI: 1.06, 2.06). CONCLUSION: Rectal STI screening is not universal in a venue-based sample of sexually-active MSM. Implementing innovative, acceptable, and accessible screening practices and improving provider comfort with talking about sex are paramount to increasing rectal STI screening. [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6809503 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68095032019-10-28 423. Self-Reported Screening for Rectal Sexually Transmitted Infections Among Men Who Have Sex with Men William. Menza, Timothy Lipira, Lauren Bhattarai, Amisha Ramirez, Joseph Orellana, Roberto Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Rectal gonorrhea and Chlamydia are common and predict HIV acquisition among men who have sex with men (MSM); however, screening for rectal sexually transmitted infections (STIs) is not routine. METHODS: In 2017, we recruited sexually-active MSM in the Portland, Oregon metropolitan area through venue-based sampling. Our outcome of interest was self-reported rectal STI screening in the prior 12 months. Stratified by HIV status, we assessed the prevalence and demographic, healthcare, clinical, and behavioral predictors of screening. RESULTS: Of 448 participants, 168 (37.5%) reported rectal STI screening. One hundred twenty-seven (35.8%) of 355 HIV-negative men, 41 (58.6%) of 70 HIV-positive men, and none of 23 men who did not know their HIV status reported screening. Among HIV-negative men, having a healthcare provider who offered HIV testing (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR]=2.09; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.43, 3.04), a syphilis diagnosis (aPR=1.32; 95% CI: 1.03, 1.69), use of pre-exposure prophylaxis (aPR=1.57; 95% CI 1.21, 2.04), and condomless anal sex with casual partners in the prior 12 months (aPR=1.74; 95% CI: 1.36, 2.22) independently predicted screening for rectal STI in multivariable analysis. HIV-positive men who reported having a provider who always or often initiates conversations about sex were significantly more likely to report screening compared with men who did not have such a provider (aPR=1.48; 95% CI: 1.06, 2.06). CONCLUSION: Rectal STI screening is not universal in a venue-based sample of sexually-active MSM. Implementing innovative, acceptable, and accessible screening practices and improving provider comfort with talking about sex are paramount to increasing rectal STI screening. [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6809503/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.496 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Abstracts William. Menza, Timothy Lipira, Lauren Bhattarai, Amisha Ramirez, Joseph Orellana, Roberto 423. Self-Reported Screening for Rectal Sexually Transmitted Infections Among Men Who Have Sex with Men |
title | 423. Self-Reported Screening for Rectal Sexually Transmitted Infections Among Men Who Have Sex with Men |
title_full | 423. Self-Reported Screening for Rectal Sexually Transmitted Infections Among Men Who Have Sex with Men |
title_fullStr | 423. Self-Reported Screening for Rectal Sexually Transmitted Infections Among Men Who Have Sex with Men |
title_full_unstemmed | 423. Self-Reported Screening for Rectal Sexually Transmitted Infections Among Men Who Have Sex with Men |
title_short | 423. Self-Reported Screening for Rectal Sexually Transmitted Infections Among Men Who Have Sex with Men |
title_sort | 423. self-reported screening for rectal sexually transmitted infections among men who have sex with men |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6809503/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.496 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT williammenzatimothy 423selfreportedscreeningforrectalsexuallytransmittedinfectionsamongmenwhohavesexwithmen AT lipiralauren 423selfreportedscreeningforrectalsexuallytransmittedinfectionsamongmenwhohavesexwithmen AT bhattaraiamisha 423selfreportedscreeningforrectalsexuallytransmittedinfectionsamongmenwhohavesexwithmen AT ramirezjoseph 423selfreportedscreeningforrectalsexuallytransmittedinfectionsamongmenwhohavesexwithmen AT orellanaroberto 423selfreportedscreeningforrectalsexuallytransmittedinfectionsamongmenwhohavesexwithmen |