Cargando…

154. Do I Really Need a Transesophageal Echo? Comparing Echocardiographic Modalities in Native Valve Infective Endocarditis due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

BACKGROUND: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infective endocarditis (IE) is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Management commonly includes six-weeks of antibiotics and surgical intervention, if the patient has complications. Current guidelines recommend obtaining an ech...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Livesay, James, Lorson, William, Eric Heidel, R, Shorman, Mahmoud
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6809529/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.229
_version_ 1783462010757840896
author Livesay, James
Lorson, William
Eric Heidel, R
Shorman, Mahmoud
author_facet Livesay, James
Lorson, William
Eric Heidel, R
Shorman, Mahmoud
author_sort Livesay, James
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infective endocarditis (IE) is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Management commonly includes six-weeks of antibiotics and surgical intervention, if the patient has complications. Current guidelines recommend obtaining an echocardiogram. Transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) is preferred over transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE). We wanted to evaluate the role of a TEE in changing management of MRSA IE. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of patients with MRSA IE was analyzed between January 2013 and July 2017 at a tertiary care facility in East Tennessee. Patients with prosthetic valves or cardiac devices were excluded. Demographic, echocardiographic, antibiotic, blood culture, mortality, and intravenous drug use data were collected (Figure 1). RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients met the inclusion criteria. TTE was performed on 73 patients while five patients proceeded directly to TEE. Of the 73 patients that had a TTE, 33 (45.2%) detected the presence of vegetation and 40 (54.8%) did not. Of the 33 patients with a positive TTE, 15 subsequently underwent TEE, confirming IE. Out of the 40 patients with a negative TTE, 34 underwent TEE, of which 22 (64.7%) showed a vegetation. (Figure 2). A total of ten patients (12.8%) from the study underwent surgery. Of these ten, three (30%) had a positive TTE only, with no subsequent TEE. Five (50%) had both a positive TTE and TEE, and two (20%) had a negative TTE but positive TEE. CONCLUSION: Transthoracic echocardiogram was adequate to visualize vegetations in 45.2% of patients. Completing a TEE increased the sensitivity of visualizing a vegetation, but management was most often not altered. Only two patients (5%) with a negative TTE, but positive TEE proceeded to surgery because of the findings. This causes us to question whether a subsequent TEE needs to be pursued when a TTE is negative in the setting of definite or possible IE by the modified Duke criteria. Even if a vegetation is seen on TEE the patient would most likely receive the same treatment, 6 weeks of intravenous antibiotics, as if no vegetation was seen. Forgoing a TEE reduces risk to the patient of undergoing a procedure, and reduces costs to the healthcare system. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6809529
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68095292019-10-28 154. Do I Really Need a Transesophageal Echo? Comparing Echocardiographic Modalities in Native Valve Infective Endocarditis due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Livesay, James Lorson, William Eric Heidel, R Shorman, Mahmoud Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infective endocarditis (IE) is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Management commonly includes six-weeks of antibiotics and surgical intervention, if the patient has complications. Current guidelines recommend obtaining an echocardiogram. Transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) is preferred over transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE). We wanted to evaluate the role of a TEE in changing management of MRSA IE. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of patients with MRSA IE was analyzed between January 2013 and July 2017 at a tertiary care facility in East Tennessee. Patients with prosthetic valves or cardiac devices were excluded. Demographic, echocardiographic, antibiotic, blood culture, mortality, and intravenous drug use data were collected (Figure 1). RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients met the inclusion criteria. TTE was performed on 73 patients while five patients proceeded directly to TEE. Of the 73 patients that had a TTE, 33 (45.2%) detected the presence of vegetation and 40 (54.8%) did not. Of the 33 patients with a positive TTE, 15 subsequently underwent TEE, confirming IE. Out of the 40 patients with a negative TTE, 34 underwent TEE, of which 22 (64.7%) showed a vegetation. (Figure 2). A total of ten patients (12.8%) from the study underwent surgery. Of these ten, three (30%) had a positive TTE only, with no subsequent TEE. Five (50%) had both a positive TTE and TEE, and two (20%) had a negative TTE but positive TEE. CONCLUSION: Transthoracic echocardiogram was adequate to visualize vegetations in 45.2% of patients. Completing a TEE increased the sensitivity of visualizing a vegetation, but management was most often not altered. Only two patients (5%) with a negative TTE, but positive TEE proceeded to surgery because of the findings. This causes us to question whether a subsequent TEE needs to be pursued when a TTE is negative in the setting of definite or possible IE by the modified Duke criteria. Even if a vegetation is seen on TEE the patient would most likely receive the same treatment, 6 weeks of intravenous antibiotics, as if no vegetation was seen. Forgoing a TEE reduces risk to the patient of undergoing a procedure, and reduces costs to the healthcare system. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6809529/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.229 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Livesay, James
Lorson, William
Eric Heidel, R
Shorman, Mahmoud
154. Do I Really Need a Transesophageal Echo? Comparing Echocardiographic Modalities in Native Valve Infective Endocarditis due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
title 154. Do I Really Need a Transesophageal Echo? Comparing Echocardiographic Modalities in Native Valve Infective Endocarditis due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
title_full 154. Do I Really Need a Transesophageal Echo? Comparing Echocardiographic Modalities in Native Valve Infective Endocarditis due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
title_fullStr 154. Do I Really Need a Transesophageal Echo? Comparing Echocardiographic Modalities in Native Valve Infective Endocarditis due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
title_full_unstemmed 154. Do I Really Need a Transesophageal Echo? Comparing Echocardiographic Modalities in Native Valve Infective Endocarditis due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
title_short 154. Do I Really Need a Transesophageal Echo? Comparing Echocardiographic Modalities in Native Valve Infective Endocarditis due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
title_sort 154. do i really need a transesophageal echo? comparing echocardiographic modalities in native valve infective endocarditis due to methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6809529/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.229
work_keys_str_mv AT livesayjames 154doireallyneedatransesophagealechocomparingechocardiographicmodalitiesinnativevalveinfectiveendocarditisduetomethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus
AT lorsonwilliam 154doireallyneedatransesophagealechocomparingechocardiographicmodalitiesinnativevalveinfectiveendocarditisduetomethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus
AT ericheidelr 154doireallyneedatransesophagealechocomparingechocardiographicmodalitiesinnativevalveinfectiveendocarditisduetomethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus
AT shormanmahmoud 154doireallyneedatransesophagealechocomparingechocardiographicmodalitiesinnativevalveinfectiveendocarditisduetomethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus