Cargando…

1535. Pharmacokinetic (PK) and Pharmacodynamic (PD) Evaluation of Cefepime (CPM) in Obese and Non-Obese Patients

BACKGROUND: Appropriate application of antimicrobial PK/PD properties is crucial to optimizing patient outcomes. Although β-lactams are among the most utilized and effective antibiotics, optimal dosing strategies in obese populations are largely unknown. The objective of this study was to compare PK...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morrisette, Taylor, Neville, Nichole, Mueller, Scott W, Britton, Abbie, Jacknin, Gabrielle, Miller, Matthew A, Fish, Douglas N
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6809547/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1399
_version_ 1783462015308660736
author Morrisette, Taylor
Neville, Nichole
Mueller, Scott W
Britton, Abbie
Jacknin, Gabrielle
Miller, Matthew A
Fish, Douglas N
author_facet Morrisette, Taylor
Neville, Nichole
Mueller, Scott W
Britton, Abbie
Jacknin, Gabrielle
Miller, Matthew A
Fish, Douglas N
author_sort Morrisette, Taylor
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Appropriate application of antimicrobial PK/PD properties is crucial to optimizing patient outcomes. Although β-lactams are among the most utilized and effective antibiotics, optimal dosing strategies in obese populations are largely unknown. The objective of this study was to compare PK/PD of CPM in non-obese (NO, weight 80–100 kg) and obese (O, weight > 100 kg) patients. METHODS: A prospective comparative PK/PD analysis was conducted in NO and O patients receiving CPM. Blood samples were obtained at 30, 60, 120, 240, 360, and 480 minutes after CPM infusion. CPM concentrations were determined by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. Non-compartmental PK analyses were performed, followed by Monte Carlo simulations (Oracle Crystal Ball®, 5,000 simulated patients) to estimate probability of target attainment (PTA) against common Gram-negative pathogens. The desired PD target for CPM was % time above MIC of unbound drug (%fT > MIC) ≥ 60%. Chi-squared and Mann–Whitney U tests were used for analysis. RESULTS: Seventeen patients were enrolled and most (94%) received CPM 2 g q8h. A significant difference in actual body weight and body mass index was observed (P < 0.001). There were no differences in other baseline or PK characteristics between the two groups. Utilizing CPM 2 g q8h, PTA ≥ 90% was not observed for organisms with an MIC of 8 μg/mL, the current CLSI breakpoint for P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii (PTA = 88% vs. 81% in NO and O groups, respectively). With a 6 g continuous infusion (CI), however, ≥ 90% PTA was achieved in both groups (PTA = 100%) for organisms with an MIC of 8 μg/mL, while a regimen of 2 g q8h (infused over 3 hours [EI]) also provided PTA of ≥ 90% in both groups (PTA = 98% vs. 92% in NO and O groups, respectively). Goal PTA was not obtained in either group for organisms with an MIC of 4 μg/mL with CPM 1 g q8h or 2 g q12h (i.e., CLSI recommended dosing for organisms with MICs of 4 μg/mL). CONCLUSION: Optimizing PK/PD parameters through novel dosing strategies are essential in both the NO and O populations for optimal CPM exposure in susceptible pathogens with higher MICs. CPM 6 grams/day by either CI or EI provides more optimal PK/PD characteristics in obese patients for pathogens with MICs at or near the current CLSI-recommended breakpoint. [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6809547
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68095472019-10-28 1535. Pharmacokinetic (PK) and Pharmacodynamic (PD) Evaluation of Cefepime (CPM) in Obese and Non-Obese Patients Morrisette, Taylor Neville, Nichole Mueller, Scott W Britton, Abbie Jacknin, Gabrielle Miller, Matthew A Fish, Douglas N Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Appropriate application of antimicrobial PK/PD properties is crucial to optimizing patient outcomes. Although β-lactams are among the most utilized and effective antibiotics, optimal dosing strategies in obese populations are largely unknown. The objective of this study was to compare PK/PD of CPM in non-obese (NO, weight 80–100 kg) and obese (O, weight > 100 kg) patients. METHODS: A prospective comparative PK/PD analysis was conducted in NO and O patients receiving CPM. Blood samples were obtained at 30, 60, 120, 240, 360, and 480 minutes after CPM infusion. CPM concentrations were determined by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. Non-compartmental PK analyses were performed, followed by Monte Carlo simulations (Oracle Crystal Ball®, 5,000 simulated patients) to estimate probability of target attainment (PTA) against common Gram-negative pathogens. The desired PD target for CPM was % time above MIC of unbound drug (%fT > MIC) ≥ 60%. Chi-squared and Mann–Whitney U tests were used for analysis. RESULTS: Seventeen patients were enrolled and most (94%) received CPM 2 g q8h. A significant difference in actual body weight and body mass index was observed (P < 0.001). There were no differences in other baseline or PK characteristics between the two groups. Utilizing CPM 2 g q8h, PTA ≥ 90% was not observed for organisms with an MIC of 8 μg/mL, the current CLSI breakpoint for P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii (PTA = 88% vs. 81% in NO and O groups, respectively). With a 6 g continuous infusion (CI), however, ≥ 90% PTA was achieved in both groups (PTA = 100%) for organisms with an MIC of 8 μg/mL, while a regimen of 2 g q8h (infused over 3 hours [EI]) also provided PTA of ≥ 90% in both groups (PTA = 98% vs. 92% in NO and O groups, respectively). Goal PTA was not obtained in either group for organisms with an MIC of 4 μg/mL with CPM 1 g q8h or 2 g q12h (i.e., CLSI recommended dosing for organisms with MICs of 4 μg/mL). CONCLUSION: Optimizing PK/PD parameters through novel dosing strategies are essential in both the NO and O populations for optimal CPM exposure in susceptible pathogens with higher MICs. CPM 6 grams/day by either CI or EI provides more optimal PK/PD characteristics in obese patients for pathogens with MICs at or near the current CLSI-recommended breakpoint. [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6809547/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1399 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Morrisette, Taylor
Neville, Nichole
Mueller, Scott W
Britton, Abbie
Jacknin, Gabrielle
Miller, Matthew A
Fish, Douglas N
1535. Pharmacokinetic (PK) and Pharmacodynamic (PD) Evaluation of Cefepime (CPM) in Obese and Non-Obese Patients
title 1535. Pharmacokinetic (PK) and Pharmacodynamic (PD) Evaluation of Cefepime (CPM) in Obese and Non-Obese Patients
title_full 1535. Pharmacokinetic (PK) and Pharmacodynamic (PD) Evaluation of Cefepime (CPM) in Obese and Non-Obese Patients
title_fullStr 1535. Pharmacokinetic (PK) and Pharmacodynamic (PD) Evaluation of Cefepime (CPM) in Obese and Non-Obese Patients
title_full_unstemmed 1535. Pharmacokinetic (PK) and Pharmacodynamic (PD) Evaluation of Cefepime (CPM) in Obese and Non-Obese Patients
title_short 1535. Pharmacokinetic (PK) and Pharmacodynamic (PD) Evaluation of Cefepime (CPM) in Obese and Non-Obese Patients
title_sort 1535. pharmacokinetic (pk) and pharmacodynamic (pd) evaluation of cefepime (cpm) in obese and non-obese patients
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6809547/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1399
work_keys_str_mv AT morrisettetaylor 1535pharmacokineticpkandpharmacodynamicpdevaluationofcefepimecpminobeseandnonobesepatients
AT nevillenichole 1535pharmacokineticpkandpharmacodynamicpdevaluationofcefepimecpminobeseandnonobesepatients
AT muellerscottw 1535pharmacokineticpkandpharmacodynamicpdevaluationofcefepimecpminobeseandnonobesepatients
AT brittonabbie 1535pharmacokineticpkandpharmacodynamicpdevaluationofcefepimecpminobeseandnonobesepatients
AT jackningabrielle 1535pharmacokineticpkandpharmacodynamicpdevaluationofcefepimecpminobeseandnonobesepatients
AT millermatthewa 1535pharmacokineticpkandpharmacodynamicpdevaluationofcefepimecpminobeseandnonobesepatients
AT fishdouglasn 1535pharmacokineticpkandpharmacodynamicpdevaluationofcefepimecpminobeseandnonobesepatients