Cargando…
1535. Pharmacokinetic (PK) and Pharmacodynamic (PD) Evaluation of Cefepime (CPM) in Obese and Non-Obese Patients
BACKGROUND: Appropriate application of antimicrobial PK/PD properties is crucial to optimizing patient outcomes. Although β-lactams are among the most utilized and effective antibiotics, optimal dosing strategies in obese populations are largely unknown. The objective of this study was to compare PK...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6809547/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1399 |
_version_ | 1783462015308660736 |
---|---|
author | Morrisette, Taylor Neville, Nichole Mueller, Scott W Britton, Abbie Jacknin, Gabrielle Miller, Matthew A Fish, Douglas N |
author_facet | Morrisette, Taylor Neville, Nichole Mueller, Scott W Britton, Abbie Jacknin, Gabrielle Miller, Matthew A Fish, Douglas N |
author_sort | Morrisette, Taylor |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Appropriate application of antimicrobial PK/PD properties is crucial to optimizing patient outcomes. Although β-lactams are among the most utilized and effective antibiotics, optimal dosing strategies in obese populations are largely unknown. The objective of this study was to compare PK/PD of CPM in non-obese (NO, weight 80–100 kg) and obese (O, weight > 100 kg) patients. METHODS: A prospective comparative PK/PD analysis was conducted in NO and O patients receiving CPM. Blood samples were obtained at 30, 60, 120, 240, 360, and 480 minutes after CPM infusion. CPM concentrations were determined by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. Non-compartmental PK analyses were performed, followed by Monte Carlo simulations (Oracle Crystal Ball®, 5,000 simulated patients) to estimate probability of target attainment (PTA) against common Gram-negative pathogens. The desired PD target for CPM was % time above MIC of unbound drug (%fT > MIC) ≥ 60%. Chi-squared and Mann–Whitney U tests were used for analysis. RESULTS: Seventeen patients were enrolled and most (94%) received CPM 2 g q8h. A significant difference in actual body weight and body mass index was observed (P < 0.001). There were no differences in other baseline or PK characteristics between the two groups. Utilizing CPM 2 g q8h, PTA ≥ 90% was not observed for organisms with an MIC of 8 μg/mL, the current CLSI breakpoint for P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii (PTA = 88% vs. 81% in NO and O groups, respectively). With a 6 g continuous infusion (CI), however, ≥ 90% PTA was achieved in both groups (PTA = 100%) for organisms with an MIC of 8 μg/mL, while a regimen of 2 g q8h (infused over 3 hours [EI]) also provided PTA of ≥ 90% in both groups (PTA = 98% vs. 92% in NO and O groups, respectively). Goal PTA was not obtained in either group for organisms with an MIC of 4 μg/mL with CPM 1 g q8h or 2 g q12h (i.e., CLSI recommended dosing for organisms with MICs of 4 μg/mL). CONCLUSION: Optimizing PK/PD parameters through novel dosing strategies are essential in both the NO and O populations for optimal CPM exposure in susceptible pathogens with higher MICs. CPM 6 grams/day by either CI or EI provides more optimal PK/PD characteristics in obese patients for pathogens with MICs at or near the current CLSI-recommended breakpoint. [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6809547 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68095472019-10-28 1535. Pharmacokinetic (PK) and Pharmacodynamic (PD) Evaluation of Cefepime (CPM) in Obese and Non-Obese Patients Morrisette, Taylor Neville, Nichole Mueller, Scott W Britton, Abbie Jacknin, Gabrielle Miller, Matthew A Fish, Douglas N Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Appropriate application of antimicrobial PK/PD properties is crucial to optimizing patient outcomes. Although β-lactams are among the most utilized and effective antibiotics, optimal dosing strategies in obese populations are largely unknown. The objective of this study was to compare PK/PD of CPM in non-obese (NO, weight 80–100 kg) and obese (O, weight > 100 kg) patients. METHODS: A prospective comparative PK/PD analysis was conducted in NO and O patients receiving CPM. Blood samples were obtained at 30, 60, 120, 240, 360, and 480 minutes after CPM infusion. CPM concentrations were determined by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. Non-compartmental PK analyses were performed, followed by Monte Carlo simulations (Oracle Crystal Ball®, 5,000 simulated patients) to estimate probability of target attainment (PTA) against common Gram-negative pathogens. The desired PD target for CPM was % time above MIC of unbound drug (%fT > MIC) ≥ 60%. Chi-squared and Mann–Whitney U tests were used for analysis. RESULTS: Seventeen patients were enrolled and most (94%) received CPM 2 g q8h. A significant difference in actual body weight and body mass index was observed (P < 0.001). There were no differences in other baseline or PK characteristics between the two groups. Utilizing CPM 2 g q8h, PTA ≥ 90% was not observed for organisms with an MIC of 8 μg/mL, the current CLSI breakpoint for P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii (PTA = 88% vs. 81% in NO and O groups, respectively). With a 6 g continuous infusion (CI), however, ≥ 90% PTA was achieved in both groups (PTA = 100%) for organisms with an MIC of 8 μg/mL, while a regimen of 2 g q8h (infused over 3 hours [EI]) also provided PTA of ≥ 90% in both groups (PTA = 98% vs. 92% in NO and O groups, respectively). Goal PTA was not obtained in either group for organisms with an MIC of 4 μg/mL with CPM 1 g q8h or 2 g q12h (i.e., CLSI recommended dosing for organisms with MICs of 4 μg/mL). CONCLUSION: Optimizing PK/PD parameters through novel dosing strategies are essential in both the NO and O populations for optimal CPM exposure in susceptible pathogens with higher MICs. CPM 6 grams/day by either CI or EI provides more optimal PK/PD characteristics in obese patients for pathogens with MICs at or near the current CLSI-recommended breakpoint. [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6809547/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1399 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Morrisette, Taylor Neville, Nichole Mueller, Scott W Britton, Abbie Jacknin, Gabrielle Miller, Matthew A Fish, Douglas N 1535. Pharmacokinetic (PK) and Pharmacodynamic (PD) Evaluation of Cefepime (CPM) in Obese and Non-Obese Patients |
title | 1535. Pharmacokinetic (PK) and Pharmacodynamic (PD) Evaluation of Cefepime (CPM) in Obese and Non-Obese Patients |
title_full | 1535. Pharmacokinetic (PK) and Pharmacodynamic (PD) Evaluation of Cefepime (CPM) in Obese and Non-Obese Patients |
title_fullStr | 1535. Pharmacokinetic (PK) and Pharmacodynamic (PD) Evaluation of Cefepime (CPM) in Obese and Non-Obese Patients |
title_full_unstemmed | 1535. Pharmacokinetic (PK) and Pharmacodynamic (PD) Evaluation of Cefepime (CPM) in Obese and Non-Obese Patients |
title_short | 1535. Pharmacokinetic (PK) and Pharmacodynamic (PD) Evaluation of Cefepime (CPM) in Obese and Non-Obese Patients |
title_sort | 1535. pharmacokinetic (pk) and pharmacodynamic (pd) evaluation of cefepime (cpm) in obese and non-obese patients |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6809547/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1399 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT morrisettetaylor 1535pharmacokineticpkandpharmacodynamicpdevaluationofcefepimecpminobeseandnonobesepatients AT nevillenichole 1535pharmacokineticpkandpharmacodynamicpdevaluationofcefepimecpminobeseandnonobesepatients AT muellerscottw 1535pharmacokineticpkandpharmacodynamicpdevaluationofcefepimecpminobeseandnonobesepatients AT brittonabbie 1535pharmacokineticpkandpharmacodynamicpdevaluationofcefepimecpminobeseandnonobesepatients AT jackningabrielle 1535pharmacokineticpkandpharmacodynamicpdevaluationofcefepimecpminobeseandnonobesepatients AT millermatthewa 1535pharmacokineticpkandpharmacodynamicpdevaluationofcefepimecpminobeseandnonobesepatients AT fishdouglasn 1535pharmacokineticpkandpharmacodynamicpdevaluationofcefepimecpminobeseandnonobesepatients |