Cargando…

205. Comparing Cefazolin and Nafcillin in Treatment of Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia: A Retrospective Study in a Single Center in the South Bronx

BACKGROUND: Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus Aureus (MSSA) bacteremia treatment includes B-lactams as first-line therapy; however, comparative effectiveness within B-lactams has not been well studied in literature. Herein, we look at definitive treatment with nafcillin or cefazolin in patients...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chiu, Chia-Yu, Sarwal, Amara, Feinstein, Addi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6809582/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.280
_version_ 1783462024137670656
author Chiu, Chia-Yu
Sarwal, Amara
Feinstein, Addi
author_facet Chiu, Chia-Yu
Sarwal, Amara
Feinstein, Addi
author_sort Chiu, Chia-Yu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus Aureus (MSSA) bacteremia treatment includes B-lactams as first-line therapy; however, comparative effectiveness within B-lactams has not been well studied in literature. Herein, we look at definitive treatment with nafcillin or cefazolin in patients with MSSA bacteremia. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients admitted at Lincoln Medical Center from January 2000 to March 2019 who had a positive blood culture for MSSA and was treated with either nafcillin or cefazolin. We excluded patients who received both nafcillin and cefazolin. In addition to this, included patients had to have (1) bacteremia alone with 14 days treatment after first negative blood culture or (2) endocarditis or osteoarthritis with 6 weeks treatment after first negative blood culture. RESULTS: Of the 186 patients identified to have at least one positive culture for MSSA during the study period, only Eighty-two patients met our set criteria. Seventy of our patients were treated with nafcillin while 12 patients were treated with cefazolin. Outcome measures included duration of bacteremia (P = 0.151), ICU admissions (P = 0.542) and development of Clostridium difficile (P = 0.475). All-cause 30 day mortality and recurrent MSSA bacteremia were not different between the two treatment groups with an incidence of 17% for cefazolin vs. 21% for nafcillin (P =1) and 1% for cefazolin vs. 0% for nafcillin (P =1), respectively. CONCLUSION: The average price of nafcillin is approximately 174 USD/day, while cefazolin is 33 USD/day. In addition to being economically practical, especially in a city hospital such as Lincoln Medical Center, cefazolin also has the benefit of only being administered every 8 hours rather than every 4 hours that nafcillin requires. This decreases the need for staff and supplies, allowing for the cefazolin regimen to be administered more easily. In this single-center study, patients who received cefazolin and nafcillin had no statistically significant difference in incidence of recurrence of bacteremia or mortality rate therefore, physicians may consider prioritizing cefazolin for treatment of MSSA bacteremia. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6809582
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68095822019-10-28 205. Comparing Cefazolin and Nafcillin in Treatment of Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia: A Retrospective Study in a Single Center in the South Bronx Chiu, Chia-Yu Sarwal, Amara Feinstein, Addi Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus Aureus (MSSA) bacteremia treatment includes B-lactams as first-line therapy; however, comparative effectiveness within B-lactams has not been well studied in literature. Herein, we look at definitive treatment with nafcillin or cefazolin in patients with MSSA bacteremia. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients admitted at Lincoln Medical Center from January 2000 to March 2019 who had a positive blood culture for MSSA and was treated with either nafcillin or cefazolin. We excluded patients who received both nafcillin and cefazolin. In addition to this, included patients had to have (1) bacteremia alone with 14 days treatment after first negative blood culture or (2) endocarditis or osteoarthritis with 6 weeks treatment after first negative blood culture. RESULTS: Of the 186 patients identified to have at least one positive culture for MSSA during the study period, only Eighty-two patients met our set criteria. Seventy of our patients were treated with nafcillin while 12 patients were treated with cefazolin. Outcome measures included duration of bacteremia (P = 0.151), ICU admissions (P = 0.542) and development of Clostridium difficile (P = 0.475). All-cause 30 day mortality and recurrent MSSA bacteremia were not different between the two treatment groups with an incidence of 17% for cefazolin vs. 21% for nafcillin (P =1) and 1% for cefazolin vs. 0% for nafcillin (P =1), respectively. CONCLUSION: The average price of nafcillin is approximately 174 USD/day, while cefazolin is 33 USD/day. In addition to being economically practical, especially in a city hospital such as Lincoln Medical Center, cefazolin also has the benefit of only being administered every 8 hours rather than every 4 hours that nafcillin requires. This decreases the need for staff and supplies, allowing for the cefazolin regimen to be administered more easily. In this single-center study, patients who received cefazolin and nafcillin had no statistically significant difference in incidence of recurrence of bacteremia or mortality rate therefore, physicians may consider prioritizing cefazolin for treatment of MSSA bacteremia. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6809582/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.280 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Chiu, Chia-Yu
Sarwal, Amara
Feinstein, Addi
205. Comparing Cefazolin and Nafcillin in Treatment of Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia: A Retrospective Study in a Single Center in the South Bronx
title 205. Comparing Cefazolin and Nafcillin in Treatment of Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia: A Retrospective Study in a Single Center in the South Bronx
title_full 205. Comparing Cefazolin and Nafcillin in Treatment of Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia: A Retrospective Study in a Single Center in the South Bronx
title_fullStr 205. Comparing Cefazolin and Nafcillin in Treatment of Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia: A Retrospective Study in a Single Center in the South Bronx
title_full_unstemmed 205. Comparing Cefazolin and Nafcillin in Treatment of Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia: A Retrospective Study in a Single Center in the South Bronx
title_short 205. Comparing Cefazolin and Nafcillin in Treatment of Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia: A Retrospective Study in a Single Center in the South Bronx
title_sort 205. comparing cefazolin and nafcillin in treatment of methicillin-susceptible staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a retrospective study in a single center in the south bronx
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6809582/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.280
work_keys_str_mv AT chiuchiayu 205comparingcefazolinandnafcillinintreatmentofmethicillinsusceptiblestaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaaretrospectivestudyinasinglecenterinthesouthbronx
AT sarwalamara 205comparingcefazolinandnafcillinintreatmentofmethicillinsusceptiblestaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaaretrospectivestudyinasinglecenterinthesouthbronx
AT feinsteinaddi 205comparingcefazolinandnafcillinintreatmentofmethicillinsusceptiblestaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaaretrospectivestudyinasinglecenterinthesouthbronx