Cargando…
2225. Are Fluoroquinolones or Macrolides Better for Treating Legionella Pneumonia? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND: Reported cases of Legionella pneumonia continue to rise in the United States; with mortality rates of 9–25%. The Infectious Disease Society of America recommends either a fluoroquinolone or azithromycin as the first-line treatment for legionellosis. While treatment of Legionella pneumoni...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6809618/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1903 |
_version_ | 1783462033449025536 |
---|---|
author | Jasper, Annie S Musuuza, Jackson S Stevens, Vanessa W Gamage, Shantini D Safdar, Nasia |
author_facet | Jasper, Annie S Musuuza, Jackson S Stevens, Vanessa W Gamage, Shantini D Safdar, Nasia |
author_sort | Jasper, Annie S |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Reported cases of Legionella pneumonia continue to rise in the United States; with mortality rates of 9–25%. The Infectious Disease Society of America recommends either a fluoroquinolone or azithromycin as the first-line treatment for legionellosis. While treatment of Legionella pneumonia improves outcome, it is uncertain as to which antibiotic offers optimal clinical outcomes. We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the effectiveness of fluoroquinolone vs. macrolide monotherapy in Legionella pneumonia. METHODS: We conducted a systematic search of literature in multiple databases through April 2019. Studies on patients diagnosed with Legionella pneumonia and treated with either antibiotic of interest were included. Mortality was used as the primary outcome to compare fluoroquinolones and macrolides. Secondary outcomes were clinical cure, time to apyrexia, length of hospital stay (LOS), and the occurrence of complications. We estimated pooled odd ratios to compare the odds of death, clinical cure, and complications. The standard mean difference was estimated for LOS and time to apyrexia. We used a random-effects model and estimated heterogeneity using the I(2) statistic. We also analyzed the risk of mortality by setting, i.e., intensive care unit (ICU) vs. non-ICU studies. RESULTS: Of the 1,583 abstracts reviewed, 20 studies with a total of 3,656 patients met inclusion criteria. The mean age of the population was 60.9 years and 68.5% were men. The mortality rate for patients treated with fluoroquinolones was 7% (102/1454) and 7.7% (125/1615) among those treated with macrolides. The overall pooled odds ratio (OR) assessing mortality risk for patients treated with fluoroquinolones vs. macrolides was 0.95 (95% CI 0.71–1.27, I(2) = 0%, p = 0.54). Odds ratios for subgroup analyses were: ICU studies (OR = 1.27, 95% CI: 0.18–9.08, I(2) = 45%, p = 0.158); non-ICU studies (OR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.71–1.32, I(2) = 0%, p = 0.616) (figure). Clinical cure, time to apyrexia, LOS, and the occurrence of complications did not differ between fluoroquinolones and macrolides. CONCLUSION: Fluoroquinolones and macrolides were found to have similar effectiveness in treatment of Legionella pneumonia for mortality outcomes. However, insufficient data for secondary outcomes was a limitation of this analysis. [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6809618 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68096182019-10-28 2225. Are Fluoroquinolones or Macrolides Better for Treating Legionella Pneumonia? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Jasper, Annie S Musuuza, Jackson S Stevens, Vanessa W Gamage, Shantini D Safdar, Nasia Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Reported cases of Legionella pneumonia continue to rise in the United States; with mortality rates of 9–25%. The Infectious Disease Society of America recommends either a fluoroquinolone or azithromycin as the first-line treatment for legionellosis. While treatment of Legionella pneumonia improves outcome, it is uncertain as to which antibiotic offers optimal clinical outcomes. We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the effectiveness of fluoroquinolone vs. macrolide monotherapy in Legionella pneumonia. METHODS: We conducted a systematic search of literature in multiple databases through April 2019. Studies on patients diagnosed with Legionella pneumonia and treated with either antibiotic of interest were included. Mortality was used as the primary outcome to compare fluoroquinolones and macrolides. Secondary outcomes were clinical cure, time to apyrexia, length of hospital stay (LOS), and the occurrence of complications. We estimated pooled odd ratios to compare the odds of death, clinical cure, and complications. The standard mean difference was estimated for LOS and time to apyrexia. We used a random-effects model and estimated heterogeneity using the I(2) statistic. We also analyzed the risk of mortality by setting, i.e., intensive care unit (ICU) vs. non-ICU studies. RESULTS: Of the 1,583 abstracts reviewed, 20 studies with a total of 3,656 patients met inclusion criteria. The mean age of the population was 60.9 years and 68.5% were men. The mortality rate for patients treated with fluoroquinolones was 7% (102/1454) and 7.7% (125/1615) among those treated with macrolides. The overall pooled odds ratio (OR) assessing mortality risk for patients treated with fluoroquinolones vs. macrolides was 0.95 (95% CI 0.71–1.27, I(2) = 0%, p = 0.54). Odds ratios for subgroup analyses were: ICU studies (OR = 1.27, 95% CI: 0.18–9.08, I(2) = 45%, p = 0.158); non-ICU studies (OR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.71–1.32, I(2) = 0%, p = 0.616) (figure). Clinical cure, time to apyrexia, LOS, and the occurrence of complications did not differ between fluoroquinolones and macrolides. CONCLUSION: Fluoroquinolones and macrolides were found to have similar effectiveness in treatment of Legionella pneumonia for mortality outcomes. However, insufficient data for secondary outcomes was a limitation of this analysis. [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6809618/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1903 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Jasper, Annie S Musuuza, Jackson S Stevens, Vanessa W Gamage, Shantini D Safdar, Nasia 2225. Are Fluoroquinolones or Macrolides Better for Treating Legionella Pneumonia? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | 2225. Are Fluoroquinolones or Macrolides Better for Treating Legionella Pneumonia? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | 2225. Are Fluoroquinolones or Macrolides Better for Treating Legionella Pneumonia? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | 2225. Are Fluoroquinolones or Macrolides Better for Treating Legionella Pneumonia? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | 2225. Are Fluoroquinolones or Macrolides Better for Treating Legionella Pneumonia? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | 2225. Are Fluoroquinolones or Macrolides Better for Treating Legionella Pneumonia? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | 2225. are fluoroquinolones or macrolides better for treating legionella pneumonia? a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6809618/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1903 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jasperannies 2225arefluoroquinolonesormacrolidesbetterfortreatinglegionellapneumoniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT musuuzajacksons 2225arefluoroquinolonesormacrolidesbetterfortreatinglegionellapneumoniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT stevensvanessaw 2225arefluoroquinolonesormacrolidesbetterfortreatinglegionellapneumoniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT gamageshantinid 2225arefluoroquinolonesormacrolidesbetterfortreatinglegionellapneumoniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT safdarnasia 2225arefluoroquinolonesormacrolidesbetterfortreatinglegionellapneumoniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |