Cargando…

2157. Evaluation of the Utility of the MRSA Nasal PCR Assay in a Community Healthcare System

BACKGROUND: The MRSA nasal PCR assay is a rapid, noninvasive test that has demonstrated a strong negative predictive value (NPV), as high as 99%, for ruling out MRSA pneumonia. These findings are based primarily on literature from large academic centers, which have evaluated both the positive predic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hobbs, Athena L V, Turner, Stephen, Parag, Bhavyata, Shea, Katherine M, Seligson, Nathan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6809701/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1837
_version_ 1783462059337318400
author Hobbs, Athena L V
Turner, Stephen
Parag, Bhavyata
Shea, Katherine M
Seligson, Nathan
author_facet Hobbs, Athena L V
Turner, Stephen
Parag, Bhavyata
Shea, Katherine M
Seligson, Nathan
author_sort Hobbs, Athena L V
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The MRSA nasal PCR assay is a rapid, noninvasive test that has demonstrated a strong negative predictive value (NPV), as high as 99%, for ruling out MRSA pneumonia. These findings are based primarily on literature from large academic centers, which have evaluated both the positive predictive value (PPV) and NPV of MRSA nasal PCR assays. Investigators sought to assess the NPV of the MRSA nasal PCR assay to rule out MRSA pneumonia within a community healthcare system. To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest study from a community hospital and the only study from a community healthcare system for the utilization of a nasal PCR assay to rule out MRSA pneumonia. METHODS: This is a multicenter, retrospective study of adult patients with both an MRSA nasal PCR assay and positive respiratory culture (sputum, bronchoalveolar lavage, or endotracheal aspirate). Data were collected from September 2014 through August 2015 at three community hospitals (bed size ranging from 328 to 706) across two states within a healthcare system. The study was approved by the Baptist Memorial Hospital Institutional Review Board. PPV and NPV 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated as previously described in the literature. RESULTS: A total of 808 patients were included in the analysis across the three hospitals. The total incidence of MRSA in positive sputum samples was 14.9% across the three facilities. Our study demonstrated an overall NPV of 95.1% (93.2, 96.6%) and a PPV of 65.9% (95% CI 57.2, 73.9%). The high NPV was retained despite unit type, resulting in 94.9% (95% CI 92.7, 96.6%), 96.3% (95% CI 90.8, 99.0%), and 94.7% (95% CI 74.0, 99.9%) for the intensive care units (ICU), medical-surgical units, and the emergency department, respectively (Table 1). CONCLUSION: We concluded that the high NPV of a negative MRSA nasal PCR assay to rule out MRSA pneumonia persisted within a community hospital system. With the results of our study, we plan to utilize institution-specific data along with previously published literature to encourage earlier discontinuation of anti-MRSA antibiotics in patients being treated for pneumonia with negative MRSA nasal PCR assays. Our study demonstrates the validity of the assay in the large community hospital setting with similar findings to studies at large academic institutions. [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6809701
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68097012019-10-28 2157. Evaluation of the Utility of the MRSA Nasal PCR Assay in a Community Healthcare System Hobbs, Athena L V Turner, Stephen Parag, Bhavyata Shea, Katherine M Seligson, Nathan Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: The MRSA nasal PCR assay is a rapid, noninvasive test that has demonstrated a strong negative predictive value (NPV), as high as 99%, for ruling out MRSA pneumonia. These findings are based primarily on literature from large academic centers, which have evaluated both the positive predictive value (PPV) and NPV of MRSA nasal PCR assays. Investigators sought to assess the NPV of the MRSA nasal PCR assay to rule out MRSA pneumonia within a community healthcare system. To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest study from a community hospital and the only study from a community healthcare system for the utilization of a nasal PCR assay to rule out MRSA pneumonia. METHODS: This is a multicenter, retrospective study of adult patients with both an MRSA nasal PCR assay and positive respiratory culture (sputum, bronchoalveolar lavage, or endotracheal aspirate). Data were collected from September 2014 through August 2015 at three community hospitals (bed size ranging from 328 to 706) across two states within a healthcare system. The study was approved by the Baptist Memorial Hospital Institutional Review Board. PPV and NPV 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated as previously described in the literature. RESULTS: A total of 808 patients were included in the analysis across the three hospitals. The total incidence of MRSA in positive sputum samples was 14.9% across the three facilities. Our study demonstrated an overall NPV of 95.1% (93.2, 96.6%) and a PPV of 65.9% (95% CI 57.2, 73.9%). The high NPV was retained despite unit type, resulting in 94.9% (95% CI 92.7, 96.6%), 96.3% (95% CI 90.8, 99.0%), and 94.7% (95% CI 74.0, 99.9%) for the intensive care units (ICU), medical-surgical units, and the emergency department, respectively (Table 1). CONCLUSION: We concluded that the high NPV of a negative MRSA nasal PCR assay to rule out MRSA pneumonia persisted within a community hospital system. With the results of our study, we plan to utilize institution-specific data along with previously published literature to encourage earlier discontinuation of anti-MRSA antibiotics in patients being treated for pneumonia with negative MRSA nasal PCR assays. Our study demonstrates the validity of the assay in the large community hospital setting with similar findings to studies at large academic institutions. [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6809701/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1837 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Hobbs, Athena L V
Turner, Stephen
Parag, Bhavyata
Shea, Katherine M
Seligson, Nathan
2157. Evaluation of the Utility of the MRSA Nasal PCR Assay in a Community Healthcare System
title 2157. Evaluation of the Utility of the MRSA Nasal PCR Assay in a Community Healthcare System
title_full 2157. Evaluation of the Utility of the MRSA Nasal PCR Assay in a Community Healthcare System
title_fullStr 2157. Evaluation of the Utility of the MRSA Nasal PCR Assay in a Community Healthcare System
title_full_unstemmed 2157. Evaluation of the Utility of the MRSA Nasal PCR Assay in a Community Healthcare System
title_short 2157. Evaluation of the Utility of the MRSA Nasal PCR Assay in a Community Healthcare System
title_sort 2157. evaluation of the utility of the mrsa nasal pcr assay in a community healthcare system
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6809701/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1837
work_keys_str_mv AT hobbsathenalv 2157evaluationoftheutilityofthemrsanasalpcrassayinacommunityhealthcaresystem
AT turnerstephen 2157evaluationoftheutilityofthemrsanasalpcrassayinacommunityhealthcaresystem
AT paragbhavyata 2157evaluationoftheutilityofthemrsanasalpcrassayinacommunityhealthcaresystem
AT sheakatherinem 2157evaluationoftheutilityofthemrsanasalpcrassayinacommunityhealthcaresystem
AT seligsonnathan 2157evaluationoftheutilityofthemrsanasalpcrassayinacommunityhealthcaresystem