Cargando…
2174. Comparison of the Verigene® and the ePlex® Blood Culture Identification Panels for Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Bloodstream Infections
BACKGROUND: Rapid diagnostic testing for the management of bloodstream infections has become paramount to improving patient outcomes. The primary objective of this study was to assess the differences between 2 FDA approved instruments. METHODS: Retrospective study from August 2018 to April 2019 at t...
Autores principales: | Johnson, J Kristie, Kpadeh-Rogers, Zegbeh, Paszkiewicz, Gwen, Claeys, Kimberly C |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6809742/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1854 |
Ejemplares similares
-
151. Comparing the Clinical Utility of Rapid Diagnostic Tests for Gram-Negative Bloodstream Infection Using a Desirability of Outcomes Ranking
por: Claeys, Kimberly C, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
285. Evaluation of the ePlex® Blood Culture Identification (BCID) Panels for Gram-positive/Gram-negative bacteria and yeasts
por: Chapin, Kimberle, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
214. Prospective Evaluation of the GenMark Dx ePlex(®) Blood Culture Identification Gram Negative Panel
por: Meeder, Jeremy, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Day at the Races: Comparing BioFire FilmArray Blood Culture ID Panels With Verigene Blood Culture Panel in Gram-Negative Bloodstream Infections Using DOOR-MAT Analysis
por: Claeys, Kimberly C, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Validation of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Driven Verigene® Blood-Culture Gram-Negative Treatment Algorithm to Improve Appropriateness of Antibiotics
por: Schlaffer, Kathryn, et al.
Publicado: (2017)